
fzf
VS Code
fd
Neovim
Bat
Notepad++
Vim Adventures
Modern terminal-based text editor

GitHub
GitLab
BitBucket
openDesktop.org
Gitea
Launchpad.net
OSOR
The Complete Open-Source and Business Software Platform.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Micro seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 89 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | micro-editor.github.io | sourceforge.net |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Micro is recommended for developers, system administrators, and anyone who frequently works within a terminal environment and needs a straightforward yet powerful text editor. It's particularly suitable for those who are looking for a simpler alternative to more complex editors like Vim or Emacs.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Microeconomics- Everything You Need to Know
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Micro and SourceForge. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of Micro yet. Be the first one to post
SourceForge is a great place for people who like open-source software. It offers a strong platform where you can find, review, and handle software, all while helping the open-source community.
SourceForge’s user interface works fine, but it could do with a modern overhaul to make it easier on the eye and give it a more intuitive feel. While it has a large community, SourceForge’s support is not as extensive...
Sourceforge has been around longer than most, and it has the projects to prove it. Lots of open source Linux, Windows and Mac projects are hosted on SF. It has a totally different project structure when compared with...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Two more lines worth stealing. Micro as the editor, because I want a terminal editor that behaves like every other text field when I am editing a commit message at 11pm:. - Source: dev.to / 20 days ago
Micro editor is a great choice as well imo but I don't think that micro has the thriving plugin ecosystem as compared to neovim but it is possible to make plugins for micro editor as well https://github.com/micro-editor/plugin-channel... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
If you are talking about agents I feel like opencode has gotten pretty good UI/UX If you are talking about a CLI editor, then micro has hit the nail on quality UX https://micro-editor.github.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
Tracking SourceForge since Mar 2021.
When comparing Micro and SourceForge, you can also consider the following products.


Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
Compare GitHub to Micro or SourceForge:

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft
Compare VS Code to Micro or SourceForge:

Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Compare GitLab to Micro or SourceForge:


Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
Compare BitBucket to Micro or SourceForge: