Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Matrix.org VS Apache Vysper

Compare Matrix.org VS Apache Vysper and see what are their differences

Matrix.org logo Matrix.org

Matrix is an open standard for decentralized persistent communication over IP.

Apache Vysper logo Apache Vysper

Apache Vysper aims to be a modular, full featured XMPP (Jabber) server.
  • Matrix.org Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-21
  • Apache Vysper Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-14

Matrix.org features and specs

  • Decentralization
    Matrix.org is built on a decentralized architecture, meaning no single entity controls the entire network. This ensures greater resilience, scalability, and prevents single points of failure.
  • Interoperability
    The platform is designed to bridge communications with other networks, such as Slack, IRC, and others, facilitating seamless interaction across different services.
  • End-to-End Encryption
    Matrix.org supports end-to-end encryption, ensuring that conversations are secure and private, and only accessible to the intended recipients.
  • Open-Source
    Matrix.org is an open-source project, allowing anyone to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code base, which promotes transparency and continuous improvement.
  • Rich Communication
    The platform supports a variety of communication forms, including text, voice, video, and file sharing, making it versatile for different use cases.

Possible disadvantages of Matrix.org

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up a Matrix server can be complex and resource-intensive, requiring technical expertise which may not be accessible to all users.
  • Latency
    Due to its decentralized nature, users might experience higher latency compared to centralized messaging platforms, particularly in global communications.
  • Limited Network
    While Matrix is growing, its network is still smaller compared to mainstream alternatives, which might affect user adoption and community size.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running a Matrix server can be resource-intensive in terms of memory and CPU usage, which might demand higher infrastructure costs.
  • Learning Curve
    Users and administrators might face a steep learning curve due to the complexity of Matrix's features and configurations.

Apache Vysper features and specs

  • Open Source
    Apache Vysper is open source, meaning it is free to use and has a community of developers that contribute to its improvements and stability.
  • XMPP Compliance
    Vysper is designed to be compliant with the XMPP protocol, which ensures compatibility with a variety of messaging clients and servers that also support the protocol.
  • Integration Capability
    It is built to integrate well with other Apache products, offering flexibility for developers working within the Apache ecosystem.
  • Extensible Architecture
    The project offers an extensible architecture, allowing developers to create custom modules and adapt the server to meet specific requirements.
  • Active Community
    The Apache Vysper project benefits from an active community, which can provide support, share best practices, and contribute to code improvements.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Vysper

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more mature XMPP servers, Vysper may lack some advanced features and functionalities that are available in those offerings.
  • Community Support
    While there is an active community, professional support is not provided, which can be a limitation for enterprises requiring guaranteed service levels.
  • Scalability Concerns
    Vysper may not scale as efficiently as other more established XMPP servers, which can be an issue for larger deployments needing to handle high traffic.
  • Complex Configuration
    The configuration and setup process may be complex, potentially requiring significant time and expertise to deploy effectively.
  • Documentation Shortcomings
    The documentation for Apache Vysper might not be as comprehensive or up-to-date as necessary, making it challenging for new users or developers.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Matrix.org and Apache Vysper)
Communication
97 97%
3% 3
Group Chat & Notifications
Messaging
100 100%
0% 0
Network & Admin
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Matrix.org and Apache Vysper. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Matrix.org and Apache Vysper

Matrix.org Reviews

Top 10 Team Chat Software for a Self-Hosted environment specifically designed for Large Enterprises
Matrix.org never charges. It's completely free. Its free servers are open to all for public registrations.

Apache Vysper Reviews

We have no reviews of Apache Vysper yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Matrix.org seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 592 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Matrix.org mentions (592)

  • Top 10 European Open-Source Projects to Watch in 2025
    End-to-end encryption guarantees respect for privacy rules. Discover further: MATrix Official Site. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Ask HN: Open-source forum platform (HN style)
    NATHAN SCHNEIDER - GOVERNABLE SPACES DEMOCRATIC DESIGN FOR ONLINE LIFE Available as PDF in https://www.ucpress.edu/books/governable-spaces/paper Really full of great advice "Side" projects * https://www.loomio.com * https://matrix.org * https://opencollective.com. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Ergo Chat – A modern IRC server written in Go
    And if it's not, or you need something more secure, there's always Matrix. https://matrix.org. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • US Senators implore Department of Defense to expand the use of Matrix
    No, they're talking about this Matrix: https://matrix.org/ Relevant blog post: https://matrix.org/blog/2024/12/unrelated-cybercriminal-network-taken-down/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Show HN: Open-source private home security camera system (end-to-end encryption)
    Sure, just wanted to tell you about it, as this seems to be defacto standard for foss android apps, for example most if not all https://matrix.org clients use it for push notifications (when you use their de googled build, or don't have play services) available. I also use a Signal fork with UnifiedPush and have some server alert scripts which post to my self-hosted ntfy instance, and the ntfy app itself will... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
View more

Apache Vysper mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Apache Vysper yet. Tracking of Apache Vysper recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Matrix.org and Apache Vysper, you can also consider the following products

Element.io - Secure messaging app with strong end-to-end encryption, advanced group chat privacy settings, secure video calls for teams, encrypted communication using Matrix open network. Riot.im is now Element.

Prosody - Prosody is a modern flexible communications server for Jabber/XMPP written in Lua.

Telegram - Telegram is a messaging app with a focus on speed and security. It’s superfast, simple and free.

Openfire - Openfire (formerly Wildfire) is a cross-platform instant messaging (IM) and groupchat server.

Signal - Fast, simple & secure messaging. Privacy that fits in your pocket.

ejabberd SaaS - Realtime XMPP and MQTT Software and Infrastructure as a Service.