Math.js VS Underscore.js

Which is more popular?

Underscore.js might be a bit more popular than Math.js. We know about 24 links to it since March 2021 and only 21 links to Math.js.

social mentions: 21 vs 24
Javascript UI Libraries popularity: 9% vs 91%
alternatives listed: 88 vs 217

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

	Math.js	Underscore.js
Website	mathjs.org	underscorejs.org
Pricing	Open source	Open source
Listed in	Calculators Productivity Advanced Calculator Javascript UI Libraries +1	Development Tools Javascript UI Libraries JavaScript Framework UI +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Math.js 0 features

Underscore.js 5 features

No features have been listed yet.

Utility Functions
Underscore.js provides a wealth of utility functions for common tasks such as map, reduce, filter, and more, making it easier to perform operations on arrays, objects, and collections.
Consistency
The library offers a consistent API, which can make your code more readable and maintainable by providing a standard way to perform common programming tasks.
Lightweight
Underscore.js is lightweight compared to full-featured libraries like Lodash, which can be a benefit if you're looking to minimize your application's footprint.
Browser Compatibility
It supports a wide range of JavaScript environments, making it a good choice for projects that need to work across different browsers and Node.js.
Quick to Learn
Easy to pick up for developers with even a basic understanding of JavaScript, due to its straightforward documentation and familiar function names.

Possible disadvantages

Performance
Underscore.js may not offer the same level of performance optimizations as more modern utility libraries like Lodash, potentially leading to slower execution for some tasks.
Limited Functionality
While it covers many basic utility functions, its feature set is not as extensive as Lodash or other similar libraries, which provide a broader range of capabilities.
Outdated
With the advent of ECMAScript 5 and later versions, many of the functions provided by Underscore.js are now natively available in JavaScript, reducing its necessity.
No Modularization
Underscore does not support modular builds in the same way Lodash does, meaning you might end up including the entire library even if you only need a few functions.
Community and Maintenance
While still maintained, Underscore.js has seen less active development and contributions compared to newer libraries, which could impact its long-term viability and support.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Math.js

Underscore.js

No analysis of Math.js yet.

Overall verdict

Underscore.js is a reasonable choice if you need a lightweight library for concise, functional programming helpers. While newer libraries or vanilla JavaScript have made some of its functions less essential, Underscore.js remains useful for its simplicity and comprehensive utility set.

Why this product is good

Underscore.js is a popular JavaScript library that provides a comprehensive set of utility functions for common programming tasks. It is valued for its simplicity and ease of integration, especially in projects that require functional programming patterns but do not need the full capabilities of larger libraries like Lodash. Underscore.js is lightweight and can significantly enhance productivity by offering functions for tasks such as object manipulation, array operations, and function binding, making code more readable and maintainable.

Recommended for

Developers working on smaller projects or legacy codebases that require a reliable utility library with functional programming techniques. It’s also suitable for those who prefer a minimalistic approach and don’t require the extensive features of heavier alternatives.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Math.js 0 videos + Add

Underscore.js 1 video + Add

No Math.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Introduction to Underscore.JS

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100

Math.js

Underscore.js

9% 9%

Javascript UI Libraries

91% 91%

100% 100%

Productivity

0% 0%

7% 7%

Development Tools

93% 93%

0% 0%

Libraries And Widgets

100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Math.js and Underscore.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Math.js 21 mentions

Underscore.js 24 mentions

JavaScript Awesome Package
Mathjs - An extensive math library for JavaScript and Node.js. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
From Engineer to Developer: Building FEAScript for Browser-Based FEM
For solving linear systems, FEAScript supports LU decomposition (adapted from math.js) and an in-house Frontal solver. For nonlinear systems, you can use the Newton-Raphson method. [Many more features are also included (check the... - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
Show HN: Heynote – A Dedicated Scratchpad for Developers
The Math blocks are powered by Math.js (https://mathjs.org/). - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

JavaScript Awesome Package
Underscore - JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
JavaScript evolution: From Lodash and Underscore to vanilla
Underscore was created by Jeremy Ashkenas (the creator of Backbone.js) in 2009 to provide a set of utility functions that JavaScript lacked at the time. It was also created to work with Backbone.js, but it slowly became a favorite among... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
KlongPy: High-Performance Array Programming in Python
There was a step-change improvement for me when I tried expressing some JS patterns via `underscore.js` instead of procedurally: eg: http://underscorejs.org/#each Thinking of something as `each | map | filter | sum` is waaay less buggy... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

Alternatives to Math.js and Underscore.js

When comparing Math.js and Underscore.js, you can also consider the following products.

Lo-Dash
Lo-Dash is a drop-in replacement for Underscore.

Compare Lo-Dash to Math.js or Underscore.js:

Lo-Dash vs Math.js Lo-Dash vs Underscore.js
jQuery
The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

Compare jQuery to Math.js or Underscore.js:

jQuery vs Math.js jQuery vs Underscore.js
Three.js
A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.

Compare Three.js to Math.js or Underscore.js:

Three.js vs Math.js Three.js vs Underscore.js
React Native
A framework for building native apps with React

Compare React Native to Math.js or Underscore.js:

React Native vs Math.js React Native vs Underscore.js
NumPad
A web-based text editor with a powerful built-in calculator

Compare NumPad to Math.js or Underscore.js:

NumPad vs Math.js NumPad vs Underscore.js
Babel
Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.

Compare Babel to Math.js or Underscore.js:

Babel vs Math.js Babel vs Underscore.js

Compare Math.js VS Underscore.js and see what are their differences