Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Materialize VS TIBCO StreamBase

Compare Materialize VS TIBCO StreamBase and see what are their differences

Grapple
Do-It-Yourself Data Analytics & Business Intelligence, Powered by AI featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Materialize logo Materialize

A Streaming Database for Real-Time Applications

TIBCO StreamBase logo TIBCO StreamBase

Analyze, continuously query, and act on IoT and other streaming data at lightning fast speeds. Take real-time operations and analytics to the next level with...
  • Materialize Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27
  • TIBCO StreamBase Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-29

Materialize features and specs

  • Real-time Analytics
    Materialize offers real-time stream processing and materialized views, which allow users to get instant results from their data without the need for batch processing. This is particularly useful for applications that require immediate insights.
  • SQL Support
    Materialize supports SQL, making it easy for users familiar with SQL databases to adopt the platform without needing to learn a new language or framework.
  • Consistency
    Materialize maintains strict consistency for its materialized views, ensuring that users always get accurate and up-to-date information from their streams.
  • Integration with Kafka
    It integrates smoothly with Kafka, allowing for easy handling of streaming data and simplifying the process of working with real-time data feeds.

Possible disadvantages of Materialize

  • Scaling Limitations
    Materialize may face challenges when scaling to handle very large data sets compared to some distributed systems designed for big data processing.
  • Limited Language Support
    While SQL is supported, some users may find the lack of alternative query language support limiting, especially if they're accustomed to more expressive query options available in other systems.
  • Complexity in Use Cases
    For more complex use cases involving intricate data transformations or processing, Materialize might require additional configuration and optimization, posing a challenge for less experienced users.
  • Resource Intensive
    The real-time nature of Materialize, especially with maintaining materialized views, can be resource-intensive, potentially leading to higher operational costs.

TIBCO StreamBase features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Materialize videos

+ Add

Bootstrap Vs. Materialize - Which One Should You Choose?

More videos:

  • Review - Materialize Review | Does it compete with Substance Painter?
  • Review - Why We Don't Need Bootstrap, Tailwind or Materialize

TIBCO StreamBase videos

No TIBCO StreamBase videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Materialize and TIBCO StreamBase)

Materialize

TIBCO StreamBase

Databases
100 100%
Databases
0% 0
Stream Processing
0 0%
Stream Processing
100% 100
Database Tools
100 100%
Database Tools
0% 0
Data Management
0 0%
Data Management
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Materialize and TIBCO StreamBase. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Materialize seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 74 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Materialize mentions (74)

  • Materialized views are obviously useful
    Did I miss in the article where OP reveals the magic database that actually does this? 3rd party solutions like https://readyset.io/ and https://materialize.com/ exist specifically because databases don’t actually have what we all want materialized views to be. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • The Missing Manual for Signals: State Management for Python Developers
    This triggered some associations for me. Strongest was Cells[0], a library for Common Lisp CLOS. The earliest reference I can find is 2002[1], making it over 20 years old. Second is incremental view maintenance systems like Feldera[2] or Materialize[3]. These use sophisticated theories (z-sets and differential dataflow) to apply efficient updates over sets of data, which generalizes the case of single variables.... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Category Theory in Programming
    It's hard to write something that is both accessible and well-motivated. The best uses of category theory is when the morphisms are far more exotic than "regular functions". E.g. It would be nice to describe a circuit of live queries (like https://materialize.com/ stuff) with proper caching, joins, etc. Figuring this out is a bit of an open problem. Haskell's standard library's Monad and stuff are watered down to... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Building Databases over a Weekend
    > [...] `https://materialize.com/` to solve their memory issues [...] Disclaimer: I work at Materialize Recently there have been major improvements in Materialize's memory usage as well as using disk to swap out some data. I find it pretty easy to hook up to Postgres/MySQL/Kafka instances: https://materialize.com/blog/materialize-emulator/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Building Databases over a Weekend
    I agree. So many disparate solutions. The streaming sql primitives are by themselves good enough (e.g. `tumble`, `hop` or `session` windows), but the infrastructural components are always rough in real life use cases. Crossing fingers for solutions like `https://github.com/feldera/feldera` to solve their memory issues, or `https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/materialized-view` to solve reliable streaming consumption.... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
View more

TIBCO StreamBase mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of TIBCO StreamBase yet. Tracking of TIBCO StreamBase recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Materialize and TIBCO StreamBase, you can also consider the following products

Apache Flink - Flink is a streaming dataflow engine that provides data distribution, communication, and fault tolerance for distributed computations.

Google Cloud Dataflow - Google Cloud Dataflow is a fully-managed cloud service and programming model for batch and streaming big data processing.

OctoSQL - OctoSQL is a query tool that allows you to join, analyse and transform data from multiple databases and file formats using SQL. - cube2222/octosql

Spark Streaming - Spark Streaming makes it easy to build scalable and fault-tolerant streaming applications.

RisingWave - RisingWave is a stream processing platform that utilizes SQL to enhance data analysis, offering improved insights on real-time data.

Confluent - Confluent offers a real-time data platform built around Apache Kafka.

Loading...