Software Alternatives & Startups

Materialize CSS VS Viola UI

Compare Materialize CSS VS Viola UI and see what are their differences

Materialize CSS

A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Viola UI

Viola UI is a Figma UI kit for fintech and AI products: investing, trading and portfolio screens built on one reconciling dataset. 45 screens in light and dark.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium $49 / One-off (Individual licence)
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Materialize CSS seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 28 times since March 2021.

social mentions
28 vs 0
Design Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 10

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Materialize CSS
Viola UI
Website materializecss.com violaui.com
Pricing
Open source
Freemium $49 / One-off (Individual licence) Official pricing
Platforms —
Figma Web
Company — Startup from Portugal · 1 - 9 employees · 2026
Listed in

About Materialize CSS and Viola UI

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Materialize CSS
Viola UI

No description of Materialize CSS yet.

Viola UI is a Figma UI kit for fintech and AI products: investing, trading and portfolio screens built around one dataset instead of a dozen disconnected mockups. Most kits fake their numbers screen by screen, so they quietly stop matching. In Viola UI, one portfolio feeds every screen. The...

Read more about Viola UI

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Materialize CSS 5 features
Viola UI 8 features
  • Responsive Design
    Materialize CSS provides a responsive grid system, making it easier to create layouts that work well on various screen sizes and devices.
  • Material Design
    Adheres to Google's Material Design principles, offering a modern and professional look that is consistent across web applications.
  • Component Variety
    Offers a wide range of pre-built components, including forms, buttons, cards, and navigation bars, which helps speed up development.
  • Customization
    Provides options to customize components using Sass, making it flexible for specific design needs.
  • Built-in JavaScript
    Includes built-in JavaScript components like modals, carousels, and tabs, which enhance functionality without requiring additional libraries.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    Although it follows Material Design guidelines, there is a learning curve associated with understanding and implementing its various components and classes.
  • File Size
    Including the full library can make your project heavier, affecting load times, especially for users on slower connections.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customizable, deeply customizing or overriding default styles can sometimes be complicated and time-consuming.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Some components still rely on jQuery, adding to the library size and potentially conflicting with modern JavaScript practices.
  • Community Support
    Compared to larger frameworks like Bootstrap, Materialize CSS has a smaller community, which can result in fewer third-party resources and plugins.
  • Screens
    45 screens, 90 frames in light and dark
  • One dataset
    Every screen draws from the same portfolio, so the numbers match
  • Components
    440 component variants
  • Colour tokens
    42 Figma variables with Light and Dark modes
  • Text styles
    23 text styles, set in Geist
  • AI copilot
    Docked copilot panel, AI insights and market brief components
  • Coverage
    Dashboard, portfolio, trading, transfers, fund research, documents, settings, onboarding
  • Charts
    Chart cards and tables built from real components

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Materialize CSS
Viola UI

Overall verdict

  • Materialize CSS is a good choice if you're looking for a framework that emphasizes Material Design and comes with a sleek, modern interface. It's particularly useful for developers who want to quickly integrate Google's design philosophy without delving into custom styling or layout creation.

Why this product is good

  • Materialize CSS is a front-end framework based on Material Design principles developed by Google. It provides a comprehensive set of UI components that help developers create visually appealing and responsive web applications quickly. The framework includes a variety of pre-styled components like buttons, forms, cards, and much more, which adhere to the Material Design guidelines. This consistency in design components helps ensure a cohesive and professional look across web applications. Additionally, it simplifies responsive design with a grid system that's easy to implement, and it comes with excellent documentation and a supportive community.

Recommended for

    Materialize CSS is recommended for teams and developers who prefer Google's Material Design aesthetic, are building applications with a focus on rapid UI development, and value consistency and ease of use. It's also great for projects where a pre-existing UI library speeds up the development process, such as prototypes, admin dashboards, or smaller web applications. However, for highly customized UI components or non-Material Design projects, other frameworks might be more suitable.

No analysis of Viola UI yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Materialize CSS 1 video + Add
Viola UI 1 video + Add

Build A Travel Agency Theme With Materialize CSS 1.0.0

Viola UI: one portfolio, every screen agrees

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Materialize CSS
Viola UI
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Materialize CSS and Viola UI.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Viola UI's answer:

General-purpose kits give you buttons and cards. Viola UI gives you finished fintech screens: investing, trading, portfolio, transfers, fund research and documents. AI copilot patterns are built in. It has 45 screens, each in light and dark, 440 component variants, 42 colour tokens and 23 text styles, all made with real Figma variables and components. Because the data reconciles, you can use it for realistic prototypes and user testing, not only for visual inspiration.

What makes your product unique?

Viola UI's answer:

Every screen in Viola UI runs on one portfolio dataset. The dashboard, holdings table, fund page and AI copilot all show the same €48,203.11 portfolio, so the numbers agree with each other in light and dark. Most UI kits fill each screen with its own placeholder numbers, and those stop matching once you put the screens side by side.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Viola UI's answer:

Product designers and design teams working on fintech, investing, trading and wealth products, and founders who need credible financial screens quickly. It’s also for teams adding AI assistants to financial apps.

What's the story behind your product?

Viola UI's answer:

I'm Kseniya, a UX/UI designer with seven years of experience. I kept seeing the same problem in fintech mockups: every screen had its own made-up numbers, and they never added up from one screen to the next. So I built Viola UI around a single portfolio. The dashboard, the holdings, the fund page and the AI copilot all draw from the same data and agree with each other, in light and dark. I wanted a kit that a fintech team could use for realistic prototypes, not just for inspiration.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Viola UI's answer:

Figma: variables with light and dark modes, components with variants, auto layout and text styles. The typeface is Geist.

User comments

Share your experience with using Materialize CSS and Viola UI. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Materialize CSS no reviews yet
Viola UI no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of Viola UI yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Materialize CSS 28 mentions
Viola UI 0 mentions
  • JavaScript Awesome Package
    Materialize - Responsive front-end framework based on Material Design. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Mistakes Were Made
    Sure, why not use Blazor? It makes life easier for the developers who are primarily backend, to work on the frontend as well. Seems like the better choice. So what's next? The UI library. No shade to the long-time standing Bootstrap, but... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Top 5 Best CSS Frameworks for Responsive Web Design in 2024
    Materialize is a modern CSS framework based on Google’s Material Design. It was created and designed by Google to provide a unified and consistent user interface across all its products. Materialize is focused on user experience as it... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

View more

Tracking Viola UI since Oct 2026.

Alternatives to Materialize CSS and Viola UI

When comparing Materialize CSS and Viola UI, you can also consider the following products.