Software Alternatives & Startups

Materialize CSS VS Speed-Check

Compare Materialize CSS VS Speed-Check and see what are their differences

Materialize CSS

A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Speed-Check

Speed-Check is a free, privacy-first browser speed test measuring download, upload, ping, and jitter via M-Lab NDT7 — no signup, no tracking, no app required.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Free Free trial

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Materialize CSS seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 28 times since March 2021.

social mentions
28 vs 0
Design Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 72

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Materialize CSS
Speed-Check
Website materializecss.com speed-check.net
Pricing
Open source
Free Free trial Official pricing
Platforms —
MacOS Windows Google Chrome Firefox Safari Edge Brave Opera Linux iOS Android Chrome OS +9
Company — Startup from Germany · 1 - 9 employees · 2025
Listed in

About Materialize CSS and Speed-Check

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Materialize CSS
Speed-Check

No description of Materialize CSS yet.

Speed-Check is a free, open, and privacy-first internet speed test that measures your download speed, upload speed, ping, and jitter directly in your browser — no signup, no app install, and no tracking of personal data. Unlike most mainstream speed tests, Speed-Check runs on the M-Lab NDT7...

Read more about Speed-Check

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Materialize CSS 5 features
Speed-Check 8 features
  • Responsive Design
    Materialize CSS provides a responsive grid system, making it easier to create layouts that work well on various screen sizes and devices.
  • Material Design
    Adheres to Google's Material Design principles, offering a modern and professional look that is consistent across web applications.
  • Component Variety
    Offers a wide range of pre-built components, including forms, buttons, cards, and navigation bars, which helps speed up development.
  • Customization
    Provides options to customize components using Sass, making it flexible for specific design needs.
  • Built-in JavaScript
    Includes built-in JavaScript components like modals, carousels, and tabs, which enhance functionality without requiring additional libraries.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    Although it follows Material Design guidelines, there is a learning curve associated with understanding and implementing its various components and classes.
  • File Size
    Including the full library can make your project heavier, affecting load times, especially for users on slower connections.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customizable, deeply customizing or overriding default styles can sometimes be complicated and time-consuming.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Some components still rely on jQuery, adding to the library size and potentially conflicting with modern JavaScript practices.
  • Community Support
    Compared to larger frameworks like Bootstrap, Materialize CSS has a smaller community, which can result in fewer third-party resources and plugins.
  • Measurement protocol
    M-Lab NDT7 (same protocol Google uses) + Cloudflare endpoints
  • Metrics measured
    Download, Upload, Ping, Jitter (all shown by default)
  • Account required
    No — fully anonymous, no signup
  • Privacy
    No personal data stored, no tracking cookies, GDPR-compliant
  • Pricing
    100% free, no premium tier
  • Embeddable widget
    Free, customizable (colors/theme), 3 sizes (compact, full, gauge)
  • Browser extensions
    Chrome (Manifest V3) + Firefox (140+)
  • PWA support
    Installable on desktop & mobile, offline fallback page

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Materialize CSS
Speed-Check

Overall verdict

  • Materialize CSS is a good choice if you're looking for a framework that emphasizes Material Design and comes with a sleek, modern interface. It's particularly useful for developers who want to quickly integrate Google's design philosophy without delving into custom styling or layout creation.

Why this product is good

  • Materialize CSS is a front-end framework based on Material Design principles developed by Google. It provides a comprehensive set of UI components that help developers create visually appealing and responsive web applications quickly. The framework includes a variety of pre-styled components like buttons, forms, cards, and much more, which adhere to the Material Design guidelines. This consistency in design components helps ensure a cohesive and professional look across web applications. Additionally, it simplifies responsive design with a grid system that's easy to implement, and it comes with excellent documentation and a supportive community.

Recommended for

    Materialize CSS is recommended for teams and developers who prefer Google's Material Design aesthetic, are building applications with a focus on rapid UI development, and value consistency and ease of use. It's also great for projects where a pre-existing UI library speeds up the development process, such as prototypes, admin dashboards, or smaller web applications. However, for highly customized UI components or non-Material Design projects, other frameworks might be more suitable.

Overall verdict

  • Speed-Check.net is a simple, no-frills internet speed testing tool that provides quick and accessible measurements of download, upload, and ping speeds without requiring installation or account creation.

Why this product is good

  • Free and easy to use with no signup required
  • Provides quick results for download, upload, and ping speeds
  • Accessible directly from a web browser on multiple devices
  • Lightweight interface that doesn't require heavy bandwidth to run the test itself
  • Useful for basic troubleshooting of internet connectivity issues

Recommended for

  • Casual users wanting a quick check of their internet speed
  • People troubleshooting basic connectivity issues at home
  • Users who prefer a simple, ad-light testing experience
  • Those who don't need advanced diagnostics or detailed historical data tracking

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Materialize CSS 1 video + Add
Speed-Check 0 videos + Add

Build A Travel Agency Theme With Materialize CSS 1.0.0

No Speed-Check videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Materialize CSS
Speed-Check
100% 100%
0% 0%
95% 95%
5% 5%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Materialize CSS and Speed-Check.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Speed-Check's answer:

Privacy-conscious internet users, remote workers, gamers, and streamers who want a fast, accurate, no-nonsense speed test — plus webmasters, bloggers, and ISPs looking for a free, embeddable widget. Secondary audiences include journalists and researchers who use the global country rankings and the open M-Lab methodology for citations.

What makes your product unique?

Speed-Check's answer:

Speed-Check is an open-source, privacy-first internet speed test built on the M-Lab NDT7 protocol (the same standard Google uses) combined with Cloudflare endpoints. Unlike most competitors, it requires no account, stores no personal data on public pages, runs only a single light ad placement, and offers a completely free embeddable widget — features that are paywalled or hidden elsewhere. It also ships with dedicated Chrome and Firefox extensions, a PWA install option, and detailed country-level rankings, glossaries, and guides.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Speed-Check's answer:

Because it combines accuracy with transparency: M-Lab NDT7 results within 2–5% of Ookla, but without the heavy ads, tracking, video pre-rolls, or mandatory accounts. The embeddable widget is free in three sizes (Ookla charges $300+/month for Speedtest Custom), upload/ping/jitter are shown by default (unlike Fast.com, which hides them), and the entire methodology is open and verifiable. Ideal for users, webmasters, and ISPs who value privacy, fairness, and full metrics.

What's the story behind your product?

Speed-Check's answer:

Speed-Check was launched in August 2025 as an independent alternative to the ad-heavy, account-gated speed tests that dominate the market. The goal was simple: build a speed test that respects user privacy, uses open measurement protocols (M-Lab NDT7), and gives back to the web by offering a free embeddable widget and browser extensions — without ever asking for a signup.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Speed-Check's answer:

React 18, Vite 5, TypeScript 5, Tailwind CSS, M-Lab NDT7 (measurement protocol), Cloudflare (CDN and edge measurement endpoints), Supabase (backend/edge functions), and PWA standards. Browser extensions are built on Manifest V3 (Chrome) and the WebExtensions API (Firefox 140+).

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

Speed-Check's answer:

As a privacy first speed test this is unknown to us. None of our users are being tracked by size and they don't need to sign up on our website.

User comments

Share your experience with using Materialize CSS and Speed-Check. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Materialize CSS no reviews yet
Speed-Check no reviews yet

View more

We have no reviews of Speed-Check yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Materialize CSS 28 mentions
Speed-Check 0 mentions
  • JavaScript Awesome Package
    Materialize - Responsive front-end framework based on Material Design. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Mistakes Were Made
    Sure, why not use Blazor? It makes life easier for the developers who are primarily backend, to work on the frontend as well. Seems like the better choice. So what's next? The UI library. No shade to the long-time standing Bootstrap, but... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Top 5 Best CSS Frameworks for Responsive Web Design in 2024
    Materialize is a modern CSS framework based on Google’s Material Design. It was created and designed by Google to provide a unified and consistent user interface across all its products. Materialize is focused on user experience as it... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

View more

Tracking Speed-Check since May 2026.

Alternatives to Materialize CSS and Speed-Check

When comparing Materialize CSS and Speed-Check, you can also consider the following products.