
Bootstrap
Foundation
Semantic UI
UIKit
Tailwind CSS
Bulma
Material UI
A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

OneLogin
Okta
Microsoft Azure Active Directory
Auth0
Rippling
Lastpass
Keeper
Cloud-based directory services. Alternative to Microsoft Active Directory.
Which is more popular?
Materialize CSS might be a bit more popular than JumpCloud. We know about 28 links to it since March 2021 and only 23 links to JumpCloud.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | materializecss.com | jumpcloud.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 250 - 499 employees · 2012 |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Materialize CSS is recommended for teams and developers who prefer Google's Material Design aesthetic, are building applications with a focus on rapid UI development, and value consistency and ease of use. It's also great for projects where a pre-existing UI library speeds up the development process, such as prototypes, admin dashboards, or smaller web applications. However, for highly customized UI components or non-Material Design projects, other frameworks might be more suitable.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
JumpCloud is recommended for small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and large businesses that require a flexible, cloud-based directory solution to manage diverse IT environments. It suits organizations that need to streamline identity management processes across multiple platforms and enhance security with tools like SSO and MFA.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Build A Travel Agency Theme With Materialize CSS 1.0.0
Can JumpCloud Replace a Windows Server?
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Materialize CSS and JumpCloud. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Material Design is a design language that combines classic principles of successful design with innovation and technology. One of the downsides of Materialize is that it does not support older versions of web...
Materialize is a modern responsive front-end framework based on the Material Design principles of Google. Material design is a design language created by Google, which combines traditional design methods with...
Created by Google in 2014, Materialize is a responsive UI framework for websites and Android apps. It provides many ready-to-use components, classes, and starter templates. It is compatible with Sass and has a...
JumpCloud is used by over 180,000 organizations worldwide and is consistently ranked as a top solution by customers. JumpCloud SSO is available as a standalone solution, or as a bundle with other JumpCloud identity,...
JumpCloud is an open directory platform that offers unified device management and access control with SSO as its core feature. This cloud based solution provides SAML integrations with over 700 popular applications...
JumpCloud is a relatively new entrant (founded in 2012) into the leadership of this segment. Because it is a next-gen identity management company, it makes a point of being among the most versatile on this list. It...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Materialize - Responsive front-end framework based on Material Design. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
Sure, why not use Blazor? It makes life easier for the developers who are primarily backend, to work on the frontend as well. Seems like the better choice. So what's next? The UI library. No shade to the long-time standing Bootstrap, but... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
Materialize is a modern CSS framework based on Google’s Material Design. It was created and designed by Google to provide a unified and consistent user interface across all its products. Materialize is focused on user experience as it... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Jumpcloud — Provides directory as a service similar to Azure AD, user management, single sign-on, and RADIUS authentication. Free for up to 10 users. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Then came the Security audit. No problem, they validated the Zero Trust environment, happy to see that 90% of the software we use is deployed by Jumpcloud. Auditors also loved Crowdstrike. We are a .NET CORE / Windows 2022 / SQL 2022... Source: about 3 years ago
For authentication, I use jumpcloud LDAPS but any LDAP server would do fine, you can just use a yaml file either works fine it's more manageability and preference. Source: over 3 years ago
When comparing Materialize CSS and JumpCloud, you can also consider the following products.

Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions
Compare Bootstrap to Materialize CSS or JumpCloud:

On-demand SSO, directory integration, user provisioning and more
Compare OneLogin to Materialize CSS or JumpCloud:

The most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world
Compare Foundation to Materialize CSS or JumpCloud:

Enterprise-grade identity management for all your apps, users & devices
Compare Okta to Materialize CSS or JumpCloud:

A UI Component library implemented using a set of specifications designed around natural language
Compare Semantic UI to Materialize CSS or JumpCloud:

Azure Active Directory is a comprehensive identity and access management cloud solution that provides a robust set of capabilities to manage users and groups and help secure access to applications including Microsoft online services like Office 365 …
Compare Microsoft Azure Active Directory to Materialize CSS or JumpCloud: