Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Materialize CSS VS Awesomic

Compare Materialize CSS VS Awesomic and see what are their differences

Materialize CSS

A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
Awesomic

We match your business with a pro designer. You get daily design work done. $7 trial week. 24 Hour Turnaround. 10К successfully completed design tasks. 1000 businesses got Awesomic designs

Rating
5.0 · 2 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
AeroDataBox
Aviation and flight API tailored for SMBs and individual developers, offering flight status, schedules, aircraft and airport data, statistics, historical data and more. Seamless REST/web hook integration via API marketplaces at affordable rates. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Materialize CSS seems to be a lot more popular than Awesomic. While we know about 28 links to Materialize CSS, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Awesomic.

social mentions
28 vs 2
Design Tools popularity
87% vs 13%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 233

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Materialize CSS
Awesomic
Website materializecss.com awesomic.com
Pricing
Open source
Official pricing
Listed in
CSS Framework Design Tools Developer Tools Development Tools +1
Design As A Service Design UI Design Web Design Design Tools Graphic Design Marketplace +3

About Materialize CSS and Awesomic

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Materialize CSS
Awesomic

No description of Materialize CSS yet.

Quality. The designers at Awesomic are pre-selected based on experience and expertise criteria. Unqualified newbies simply have no way to join the team. Speed. You’ll get the first concepts from your designer in the first 24 hours since the start of the project. But the first updates will be...

Read more about Awesomic

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Materialize CSS 5 features
Awesomic 5 features
  • Responsive Design
    Materialize CSS provides a responsive grid system, making it easier to create layouts that work well on various screen sizes and devices.
  • Material Design
    Adheres to Google's Material Design principles, offering a modern and professional look that is consistent across web applications.
  • Component Variety
    Offers a wide range of pre-built components, including forms, buttons, cards, and navigation bars, which helps speed up development.
  • Customization
    Provides options to customize components using Sass, making it flexible for specific design needs.
  • Built-in JavaScript
    Includes built-in JavaScript components like modals, carousels, and tabs, which enhance functionality without requiring additional libraries.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    Although it follows Material Design guidelines, there is a learning curve associated with understanding and implementing its various components and classes.
  • File Size
    Including the full library can make your project heavier, affecting load times, especially for users on slower connections.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customizable, deeply customizing or overriding default styles can sometimes be complicated and time-consuming.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Some components still rely on jQuery, adding to the library size and potentially conflicting with modern JavaScript practices.
  • Community Support
    Compared to larger frameworks like Bootstrap, Materialize CSS has a smaller community, which can result in fewer third-party resources and plugins.
  • Subscription Model
    Awesomic offers a subscription-based model which can provide cost savings for businesses needing regular design work. It allows for flexible monthly payments instead of large, one-time fees.
  • Access to Diverse Talent
    Users gain access to a wide range of professional designers, each with various specialties and expertise, enabling businesses to find the right match for specific projects.
  • Quick Turnaround
    Awesomic promises prompt delivery of design projects, often within 24-48 hours, making it ideal for businesses with tight deadlines.
  • Quality Assurance
    Projects undergo a thorough review process to ensure high-quality outcomes, which can be particularly beneficial for businesses looking to maintain a professional standard.
  • Scalability
    Businesses can easily scale up or down their design needs based on project demands, thanks to the flexible subscription plans offered by Awesomic.

Possible disadvantages

  • Monthly Cost
    The subscription model, while flexible, may not be cost-effective for businesses with sporadic design needs, potentially leading to underutilization.
  • Dependency on Platform
    Relying on a third-party platform for design work can create dependency issues and may complicate direct communication with freelance designers.
  • Limited Personalization
    The quick turnaround and standardized processes might limit the level of personalization and deep customization possible for more complex or nuanced projects.
  • Variable Designer Experience
    While there is access to diverse talent, the experience and quality of individual designers can vary, potentially affecting the consistency of the final output.
  • Potential for Overload
    If the service becomes too popular, there is a risk that Awesomic could become overloaded with requests, potentially impacting delivery times and service quality.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Materialize CSS
Awesomic

Overall verdict

  • Materialize CSS is a good choice if you're looking for a framework that emphasizes Material Design and comes with a sleek, modern interface. It's particularly useful for developers who want to quickly integrate Google's design philosophy without delving into custom styling or layout creation.

Why this product is good

  • Materialize CSS is a front-end framework based on Material Design principles developed by Google. It provides a comprehensive set of UI components that help developers create visually appealing and responsive web applications quickly. The framework includes a variety of pre-styled components like buttons, forms, cards, and much more, which adhere to the Material Design guidelines. This consistency in design components helps ensure a cohesive and professional look across web applications. Additionally, it simplifies responsive design with a grid system that's easy to implement, and it comes with excellent documentation and a supportive community.

Recommended for

    Materialize CSS is recommended for teams and developers who prefer Google's Material Design aesthetic, are building applications with a focus on rapid UI development, and value consistency and ease of use. It's also great for projects where a pre-existing UI library speeds up the development process, such as prototypes, admin dashboards, or smaller web applications. However, for highly customized UI components or non-Material Design projects, other frameworks might be more suitable.

Overall verdict

  • Awesomic is generally considered a good service, especially for businesses and entrepreneurs seeking design solutions.

Why this product is good

  • Speed
    The platform is known for quick turnaround times, making it ideal for fast-paced projects.
  • Flexibility
    Awesomic allows clients to request various types of design work, ranging from logos to marketing materials.
  • Customer service
    Users often praise their responsive and helpful customer support team.
  • Cost effectiveness
    For many users, Awesomic provides a cost-effective solution compared to hiring full-time designers or going through design agencies.
  • Quality of designs
    Awesomic offers high-quality design services with a focus on creativity and efficiency.

Recommended for

  • Small to medium-sized businesses needing regular design updates.
  • Startups looking for branding and marketing materials.
  • Entrepreneurs who require quick design solutions without the overhead of hiring a full-time designer.
  • Marketing teams that need flexible and scalable design resources.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Materialize CSS 1 video + Add
Awesomic 1 video + Add

Build A Travel Agency Theme With Materialize CSS 1.0.0

Get Your Designer – Awesomic

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Materialize CSS
Awesomic
87% 87%
Design Tools
13% 13%
0% 0%
Design As A Service
100% 100%
100% 100%
CSS Framework
0% 0%
100% 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Materialize CSS and Awesomic. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Materialize CSS no reviews yet
Awesomic 5.0 · 2 reviews

View more

  • Rated 5/5 by Yuriy
    SaaSHub review
    · Aug 2022

    Hi, my name is Yurii. Pleased to meet you and allow me to leave a review in a few words: The Awesomic team, agreed to help me with the implementation of this project (on a volunteer basis and already the second month...

  • Really an amazing service so far!
    SaaSHub review
    · Aug 2022

    Really an amazing service so far! Awesomic is fast and stays in good communication daily and weekly! I am very pleased with Awesomic!

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Materialize CSS 28 mentions
Awesomic 2 mentions
  • JavaScript Awesome Package
    Materialize - Responsive front-end framework based on Material Design. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Mistakes Were Made
    Sure, why not use Blazor? It makes life easier for the developers who are primarily backend, to work on the frontend as well. Seems like the better choice. So what's next? The UI library. No shade to the long-time standing Bootstrap, but... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Top 5 Best CSS Frameworks for Responsive Web Design in 2024
    Materialize is a modern CSS framework based on Google’s Material Design. It was created and designed by Google to provide a unified and consistent user interface across all its products. Materialize is focused on user experience as it... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

View more

  • I created my MVP. I've shown it to 2 customers. They are happy about it.
    We actually do something similar to awesomic.io, but are at an earlier stage in our business - so less expensive. If it turns out we're not a good fit, let me know and I can give some recommendations to other agencies. Source: about 4 years ago
  • I created my MVP. I've shown it to 2 customers. They are happy about it.
    I am currently looking to improve on UI design. Let me know if you are aware of any good agencies. I want to hire from awesomic.io, but currently, I'm out of budget. How about charging customers from the early adopter's program for some... Source: about 4 years ago

Alternatives to Materialize CSS and Awesomic

When comparing Materialize CSS and Awesomic, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...