Software Alternatives & Startups

Material UI VS Microsoft Expression Web

Compare Material UI VS Microsoft Expression Web and see what are their differences

Material UI

A CSS Framework and a Set of React Components that Implement Google's Material Design

Rating
5.0 · 1 review
Pricing
Open source Free
Microsoft Expression Web

Microsoft Expression Web, part of Microsoft's Expression Studio, is an HTML editor and general...

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Material UI seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 76 times since March 2021.

social mentions
76 vs 0
Design Tools popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Material UI
Microsoft Expression Web
Website material-ui.com microsoft.com
Pricing
Open source Free
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Material UI 6 features
Microsoft Expression Web 11 features
  • Comprehensive Component Library
    Material UI offers a wide range of pre-built components that adhere to Google's Material Design guidelines, making it easier to build aesthetically pleasing user interfaces quickly.
  • Customizability
    Material UI components are highly customizable. Developers can easily adjust styles, themes, and behaviors to match specific project requirements.
  • Active Community and Support
    Material UI has a large and active community of developers. This means better support, frequent updates, and a wealth of resources like tutorials and documentation.
  • Improved Productivity
    The pre-built components and templates can greatly reduce the time and effort required to develop UI elements, thereby increasing development productivity.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Designed to work across multiple browsers, Material UI ensures a consistent user experience regardless of the platform.
  • Accessibility
    Material UI includes features that improve accessibility, conforming to WCAG guidelines to create more inclusive web applications.

Possible disadvantages

  • Performance Overhead
    The inclusion of numerous pre-built components and styles can introduce performance overhead, especially in larger applications.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its extensive documentation, new developers or those not familiar with Material Design may find it challenging to learn and implement Material UI effectively.
  • Dependency on Material Design
    Material UI strictly adheres to Material Design principles, which may not be suitable for all projects or could limit creative freedom for some designers.
  • Bundle Size
    Incorporating Material UI into a project can significantly increase the bundle size, affecting the overall load time of the web application.
  • Customization Complexity
    While highly customizable, the process of overriding default styles and components can sometimes be complex and cumbersome, requiring an in-depth understanding of both Material UI and CSS-in-JS.
  • Dependency on React
    Material UI is tightly integrated with React, meaning it can't be easily used in non-React projects, limiting its applicability.
  • Integrated Development Environment
    Provides an intuitive and user-friendly interface that supports a wide range of web development tasks, making it easier for developers to manage workflows.
  • Standards Compliance
    Ensures that web designs are standards-compliant, supporting modern web standards like HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, which helps in creating cross-browser compatible websites.
  • SEO Tools
    Includes built-in SEO reporting and analysis tools that help optimize web pages for search engines, thereby improving website visibility and reach.
  • Code Validation
    Supports real-time code validation that helps identify and correct errors in HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code, leading to cleaner and more efficient code.
  • FTP Integration
    Features integrated FTP functionalities allowing easy deployment and management of websites directly from the development environment.
  • Compatibility
    Can be used alongside other Microsoft tools and services, such as Visual Studio and Azure, enhancing the overall development ecosystem.
  • Multitasking Capabilities
    The Surface Duo 2 features two screens, allowing users to run two apps simultaneously, increasing productivity and efficiency for multitasking.
  • Slim Design
    With its slim and sleek design, the Surface Duo 2 is highly portable and easy to carry, making it convenient for users on the go.
  • Integration with Microsoft Ecosystem
    Seamless integration with Microsoft services and applications is a strong point, making it ideal for users who are deeply embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem.
  • High-Quality Displays
    The device offers high-resolution displays that provide vibrant colors and sharp images, enhancing the user experience for viewing content.
  • Innovative Form Factor
    Its dual-screen design represents an innovative approach to mobile devices, offering new possibilities for interaction and app usage.

Possible disadvantages

  • Discontinuation
    Microsoft Expression Web has been discontinued, meaning no new updates, features, or support will be provided, which may lead to potential security and compatibility issues over time.
  • Learning Curve
    Although user-friendly, it has a learning curve for those who are new to web development or those coming from different development platforms.
  • Limited Language Support
    Primarily focused on HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, and may not support other web development languages as comprehensively as some other modern IDEs.
  • No Server-side Scripting
    Does not provide robust support for server-side scripting languages like PHP or ASP.NET, requiring developers to use additional tools for backend development.
  • Outdated Resources
    The lack of updates and support means that the tool may not keep up with the latest web technologies and practices, making it less suitable for modern web development.
  • High Price
    The Surface Duo 2 is relatively expensive compared to other smartphones, which may deter potential buyers looking for more affordable options.
  • Limited App Optimization
    Not all apps are optimized for the dual-screen experience, which can lead to a less-than-ideal performance or user experience on some applications.
  • Battery Life
    The battery life may not be as robust as other devices, especially when using both screens extensively, leading to more frequent charging.
  • Camera Quality
    The camera quality may not match up to other flagship smartphones, which can be a drawback for users who prioritize photography.
  • Lack of 5G
    The device does not support 5G connectivity, which might be a limitation for users looking to future-proof their device with the latest network technology.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Material UI
Microsoft Expression Web

Overall verdict

  • Material UI is considered a strong choice for developers who want to create applications with a modern and clean look, leveraging Google's Material Design principles. Its rich set of components and strong community support make it a reliable option for both small and large projects.

Why this product is good

  • Material UI (MUI) is a widely-used React component library that implements Google's Material Design guidelines, providing a consistent and modern aesthetic for web applications.
  • It offers a comprehensive set of customizable components, making it easier for developers to build responsive and visually appealing UIs.
  • MUI is well-documented and has a large community, which means plenty of third-party resources, tutorials, and support are available.
  • The library is continuously updated and maintained, ensuring compatibility with the latest versions of React and web standards.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking for a ready-to-use set of components adhering to Material Design, without sacrificing flexibility.
  • Projects requiring a quick development turnaround where a polished and professional UI is needed.
  • Teams that prefer not to spend extensive time on UI design and implementation while still achieving a high-quality look.

Overall verdict

  • Microsoft Expression Web is considered a decent tool for web development, especially for those who prefer a visual interface.

Why this product is good

  • Expression Web was well-regarded for its WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) editor, support for modern web standards like HTML5 and CSS3, and integration with other Microsoft services. It also provided useful features like syntax highlighting, code suggestions, and live previews.

Recommended for

  • Beginners in web development who benefit from a visual editing tool.
  • Designers who prefer a mixed approach of designing and coding.
  • Developers who integrate with other Microsoft tools or services.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Material UI 2 videos + Add
Microsoft Expression Web 9 videos + Add

Getting Started With Material-UI For React (Material Design for React)

More videos

  • - Code Review: react-material-ui-datatable

Microsoft Expression Web 4 - Viewing Features

More videos

  • - Microsoft Launcher Review! [Android App]
  • - Surface Duo Review: The Good, The Bad & The Ugly!
  • - Install Microsoft Expression Web 4 on Windows 10
  • - OK! WHAT'S NEW IN MICROSOFT LAUNCHER BIGGEST UPDATE! v6
  • - Microsoft Surface Duo Review: ONE YEAR LATER
  • - Microsoft Surface Duo Review in 2022 - Microsoft Redeems Itself!
  • - Microsoft launcher - Why should you check it out! - Quick Look & Guide (2020)

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Material UI
Microsoft Expression Web
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Material UI and Microsoft Expression Web. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Material UI 5.0 · 1 review
Microsoft Expression Web no reviews yet

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Material UI 76 mentions
Microsoft Expression Web 0 mentions
  • JavaScript Awesome Package
    Material-UI - React components for faster and easier web development. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Building Forms with zod and react-hook-form
    Material UI: Component library to style our form input fields. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Getting started with NextUI and Next.js
    These UI components and elements usually include Button, Navbar, Tooltip, Tab components, and more. Many UI libraries exist, including React Bootstrap, built on the popular Bootstrap CSS library, and Material-UI, one of the most popular... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

View more

Tracking Microsoft Expression Web since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Material UI and Microsoft Expression Web

When comparing Material UI and Microsoft Expression Web, you can also consider the following products.