Software Alternatives & Startups

Material Security VS Protected Trust

Compare Material Security VS Protected Trust and see what are their differences

Material Security

Material Security provides phishing protection, account takeover prevention, and email DLP for Google Workspace and Microsoft 365.

No screenshot yet
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Paid $3 / Monthly (per user)
Protected Trust

Protected Trust works to enable businesses to experience high productivity and security with Microsoft 365 and Surface.

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Data Loss Prevention popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
5 vs 35

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Material Security
Protected Trust
Website material.security protectedtrust.com
Pricing
Paid $3 / Monthly (per user) Official pricing
—
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Material Security 5 features
Protected Trust 5 features
  • Cloud Email/Data Protection Focus
    Material Security specializes in protecting cloud email platforms like Google Workspace and Microsoft 365, offering deep visibility into account compromise risks and data exposure within these ecosystems.
  • Post-Delivery Threat Detection
    The platform can detect and remediate threats even after emails have been delivered to inboxes, addressing risks that traditional perimeter-based email security tools might miss.
  • Automated Sensitive Data Discovery
    Material Security helps organizations automatically identify sensitive data (like credentials, financial info, and PII) sitting in employee mailboxes, reducing the risk of data exposure from compromised accounts.
  • Account Takeover Mitigation
    It provides tools to quickly detect and respond to account takeover incidents, including automated workflows to lock down access and prevent lateral movement within cloud email systems.
  • Integration with Existing Cloud Suites
    The solution integrates directly with Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 APIs, allowing for deployment without requiring changes to mail routing or existing infrastructure.

Possible disadvantages

  • Narrow Platform Focus
    Material Security is primarily designed for Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 environments, which may limit its usefulness for organizations using other email or collaboration platforms.
  • Pricing Transparency
    Pricing information is not publicly available and typically requires contacting sales, which can make budgeting and quick comparisons with competitors more difficult.
  • Learning Curve for Full Utilization
    To fully leverage its advanced detection and automation capabilities, security teams may need dedicated time to configure policies and understand the platform's more nuanced features.
  • Overlap with Native Security Tools
    Some capabilities may overlap with native security features already offered by Google Workspace and Microsoft 365, potentially raising questions about incremental value for smaller organizations.
  • Limited Broader Ecosystem Coverage
    Since it focuses heavily on email and cloud office suites, organizations needing comprehensive endpoint, network, or multi-cloud security may need to integrate additional specialized tools.
  • Enhanced Security
    Protected Trust offers robust encryption and secure email services designed to protect sensitive communications from unauthorized access.
  • Integration with Microsoft 365
    The service seamlessly integrates with Microsoft 365, allowing users to maintain productivity while benefiting from added security features.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform is designed with a user-friendly interface, making it easier for users to navigate and utilize its features effectively.
  • Compliance Support
    Protected Trust helps organizations meet various regulatory compliance requirements, such as HIPAA, by providing necessary security controls and documentation tools.
  • Customer Support
    The company offers strong customer support, providing assistance through various channels to help resolve any issues or questions that may arise.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Protected Trust might be more expensive compared to other email security solutions, which could be a concern for small businesses with limited budgets.
  • Limited to Microsoft Ecosystem
    The platform's strong emphasis on integration with Microsoft 365 may limit its applicability for organizations that use alternative cloud services, reducing its versatility.
  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, some users may still face a learning curve when initially adopting the platform, particularly if they are not familiar with security configurations.
  • Dependency on Internet Connectivity
    As a cloud-based service, its full functionality relies on stable internet connectivity, which can be a limitation in areas with unreliable internet service.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Material Security
Protected Trust

Overall verdict

  • Material Security is a strong choice for organizations looking to add a modern, cloud-native layer of protection specifically for email and collaboration platforms like Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, focusing on post-delivery threat detection and data protection.

Why this product is good

  • Provides post-delivery protection that automatically detects and remediates threats even after an email lands in the inbox, reducing the window of exposure.
  • Uses privacy-preserving techniques to scan and protect sensitive data within email accounts without broadly exposing content to human review.
  • Strong focus on account takeover (ATO) detection and automated incident response, minimizing damage from compromised credentials.
  • Integrates deeply with Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 APIs for native, low-friction deployment without requiring MX record changes.
  • Offers robust data loss prevention for legacy sensitive data sitting dormant in mailboxes, which is often overlooked by traditional email security tools.
  • Backed by a strong security research team that focuses on real-world attacker behavior and evolving phishing/BEC techniques.

Recommended for

  • Enterprises heavily reliant on Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace as their primary collaboration suite.
  • Security teams looking to complement existing secure email gateways (SEGs) with deeper, post-delivery visibility.
  • Organizations concerned about business email compromise (BEC) and account takeover risks.
  • Companies needing to identify and remediate sensitive data exposure within old or forgotten emails and files.
  • IT and SecOps teams that want automated incident response workflows to reduce manual triage time.

No analysis of Protected Trust yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Material Security 1 video + Add
Protected Trust 0 videos + Add

Material Security Explainer (30s)

No Protected Trust videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Material Security
Protected Trust
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
10% 10%
90% 90%

User comments

Share your experience with using Material Security and Protected Trust. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Alternatives to Material Security and Protected Trust

When comparing Material Security and Protected Trust, you can also consider the following products.