Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Material Maker VS Splitaha

Compare Material Maker VS Splitaha and see what are their differences

Material Maker

Cross-platform, procedural texture generation tool.

Rating
0 reviews
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
Splitaha

Splitaha allows users to easily manage shared expenses between friends, families, and individuals

Rating
0 reviews
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
ScreenSnap Pro
Stop sharing plain, boring screenshots. Add stunning backgrounds, pro annotations, and instant cloud links — all in one click. Pay once, own it forever. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Material Maker seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 8 times since March 2021.

social mentions
8 vs 0
3D popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
55 vs 1

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Material Maker
Splitaha
Website rodzilla.itch.io splitaha.com
Pricing —
Official pricing
Listed in
3D Architecture Design Tools Graphic Design Software +1
Bill-Splitting Apps Expense Splitting Budgeting Expense Tracking +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Material Maker 5 features
Splitaha 3 features
  • Free and Open Source
    Material Maker is available for free and is open source, allowing users to modify and contribute to the software, making it accessible to a wide range of users without financial barriers.
  • Node-Based Workflow
    The software provides a node-based workflow which allows for ease of use and powerful procedural texturing, making it simple for users to create complex materials efficiently.
  • Integration with Godot Engine
    Material Maker integrates well with the Godot Engine, facilitating smooth workflows for game developers who use this popular open-source game engine.
  • Community Support
    A growing community of users contributes to the sharing of tips, resources, and materials, providing a supportive environment for learning and expanding skills.
  • Cross-Platform
    Material Maker is available on multiple platforms, including Windows, MacOS, and Linux, offering flexibility for users across different operating systems.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep Learning Curve
    While powerful, the node-based system can be complex for beginners, requiring a significant investment of time to become proficient.
  • Limited Documentation
    The available documentation can be sparse, potentially leading to challenges in understanding all features and tools available in the software.
  • Performance Issues on Large Projects
    Some users have reported performance slowdowns when working on larger or more complex projects, which can hinder workflow efficiency.
  • Less Polished Interface
    Compared to commercial alternatives, Material Maker may have a less polished UI, which might impact the user experience.
  • Limited Features Compared to Paid Tools
    Material Maker may lack some advanced features offered by commercial texturing software, which could be a limitation for professional users seeking specific capabilities.
  • Likely focused on expense splitting
    Based on the name, Splitaha appears to be a bill or expense-splitting tool. I could not access or verify the site, so confirm this on splitaha.com. If it is, a tool built for one purpose is usually simpler than a general finance app.
  • Potential convenience for group costs
    Expense-splitting apps generally replace manual spreadsheets and chat arithmetic for trips, roommates and shared meals. Check whether Splitaha offers features such as automatic balance calculation or simplified debts.
  • Possible low barrier to entry
    Many apps in this category have free tiers or need no complicated setup. I have not verified Splitaha's pricing or onboarding, so check them directly.

Possible disadvantages

  • Unverified information
    I could not browse the site or find reliable details about Splitaha, so any feature claims here are assumptions. Check the site itself before relying on them.
  • Limited track record or reviews
    I found no established user reviews, so I cannot confirm its reliability, popularity or support quality. Look for independent reviews and app store ratings.
  • Unknown data privacy and security
    Apps that handle shared financial details should state clearly how they store and protect data. Review Splitaha's privacy policy and security practices before entering sensitive information.
  • Unknown payment and integration support
    It is unclear whether Splitaha supports settling up through payment services, multiple currencies or exports. Established competitors such as Splitwise offer some of these, so compare features before committing.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Material Maker
Splitaha

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Material Maker is considered a good tool, especially for those looking for a cost-effective solution to create procedural textures. Its features and user-friendly design make it a solid choice for both beginners and experienced users in the field.

Why this product is good

  • Material Maker is a popular tool among 3D artists and game developers for creating procedural textures and materials. It is praised for being open-source and free, making it accessible to a wide audience. Users appreciate its node-based interface, which is similar to other industry-standard software, allowing for a smooth learning curve. The software is also valued for its capability to produce high-quality textures that can be used in various 3D modeling and game development projects. Regular updates and a supportive community contribute to its positive reception.

Recommended for

    Material Maker is recommended for 3D artists, game developers, and hobbyists who are interested in creating procedural materials and textures without incurring high software costs. It is also suitable for educators and students who require an accessible and powerful tool for learning and teaching purposes in digital art and design.

No analysis of Splitaha yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Material Maker 3 videos + Add
Splitaha 0 videos + Add

Material Maker 0.8 Released -- Now with more better!

More videos

  • - Material Maker -- Godot Powered Procedural Texture Creator (Free & Open Source!)
  • - Material Maker & Pixelorama -- Godot Powered Open Source GameDev Goodness!

No Splitaha videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Material Maker
Splitaha
100% 100%
3D
0% 0%
0% 0%
Expense Splitting
100% 100%
100% 100%
Architecture
0% 0%
0% 0%
Expense Tracking
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Material Maker and Splitaha. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Material Maker 8 mentions
Splitaha 0 mentions
  • Underw[A]ter [OC]
    In a software called material maker, this is the setup(slightly different but this basically just offsets the textures). Source: over 3 years ago
  • Godot showing off a texture I made in material maker
    Did you find it? Here it is if you didn't. It's made in Godot. Source: over 3 years ago
  • How would you go about modeling this?
    “Name your own price” alternative based on the Godot engine https://rodzilla.itch.io/material-maker. Source: almost 4 years ago

View more

Tracking Splitaha since Oct 2026.

Alternatives to Material Maker and Splitaha

When comparing Material Maker and Splitaha, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...