Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Material Maker VS Cubasis

Compare Material Maker VS Cubasis and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Material Maker logo Material Maker

Cross-platform, procedural texture generation tool.

Cubasis logo Cubasis

Cubasis is Steinbergโ€™s streamlined, multitouch sequencer for the iPad.
  • Material Maker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-28
  • Cubasis Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-30

Material Maker features and specs

  • Free and Open Source
    Material Maker is available for free and is open source, allowing users to modify and contribute to the software, making it accessible to a wide range of users without financial barriers.
  • Node-Based Workflow
    The software provides a node-based workflow which allows for ease of use and powerful procedural texturing, making it simple for users to create complex materials efficiently.
  • Integration with Godot Engine
    Material Maker integrates well with the Godot Engine, facilitating smooth workflows for game developers who use this popular open-source game engine.
  • Community Support
    A growing community of users contributes to the sharing of tips, resources, and materials, providing a supportive environment for learning and expanding skills.
  • Cross-Platform
    Material Maker is available on multiple platforms, including Windows, MacOS, and Linux, offering flexibility for users across different operating systems.

Possible disadvantages of Material Maker

  • Steep Learning Curve
    While powerful, the node-based system can be complex for beginners, requiring a significant investment of time to become proficient.
  • Limited Documentation
    The available documentation can be sparse, potentially leading to challenges in understanding all features and tools available in the software.
  • Performance Issues on Large Projects
    Some users have reported performance slowdowns when working on larger or more complex projects, which can hinder workflow efficiency.
  • Less Polished Interface
    Compared to commercial alternatives, Material Maker may have a less polished UI, which might impact the user experience.
  • Limited Features Compared to Paid Tools
    Material Maker may lack some advanced features offered by commercial texturing software, which could be a limitation for professional users seeking specific capabilities.

Cubasis features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Cubasis is known for its intuitive and accessible interface, making it easy for both beginners and experienced users to navigate and create music efficiently.
  • Comprehensive Feature Set
    It offers a wide range of features including MIDI and audio recording, virtual instruments, a variety of effects, and automation, providing a complete DAW experience on mobile devices.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Cubasis is available on both iOS and Android devices, allowing users to create and edit projects on multiple platforms.
  • High-Quality Sound Engine
    The application uses a high-quality audio engine that ensures professional-grade sound output and provides real-time processing for all tracks.
  • Integration with Other Steinberg Products
    Cubasis can seamlessly integrate with other Steinberg products, like Cubase, allowing users to transfer projects easily between mobile and desktop environments.

Possible disadvantages of Cubasis

  • Limited Track Count
    Compared to desktop DAWs, Cubasis may have a limited number of tracks and effects that can be used simultaneously, which might be restrictive for larger projects.
  • Resource Intensive
    The application can be resource-intensive on mobile devices, potentially leading to performance issues on older hardware.
  • In-App Purchases
    While the base application comes with many features, a number of advanced functionalities and additional instruments require in-app purchases.
  • Learning Curve for Beginners
    Despite its intuitive interface, complete newcomers to digital audio workstations may still need time to understand all the features and workflow.
  • Occasional Stability Issues
    Some users have reported occasional crashes or stability issues, especially during complex tasks or when used on older devices.

Analysis of Material Maker

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Material Maker is considered a good tool, especially for those looking for a cost-effective solution to create procedural textures. Its features and user-friendly design make it a solid choice for both beginners and experienced users in the field.

Why this product is good

  • Material Maker is a popular tool among 3D artists and game developers for creating procedural textures and materials. It is praised for being open-source and free, making it accessible to a wide audience. Users appreciate its node-based interface, which is similar to other industry-standard software, allowing for a smooth learning curve. The software is also valued for its capability to produce high-quality textures that can be used in various 3D modeling and game development projects. Regular updates and a supportive community contribute to its positive reception.

Recommended for

    Material Maker is recommended for 3D artists, game developers, and hobbyists who are interested in creating procedural materials and textures without incurring high software costs. It is also suitable for educators and students who require an accessible and powerful tool for learning and teaching purposes in digital art and design.

Analysis of Cubasis

Overall verdict

  • Cubasis by Steinberg is considered a strong option for mobile music production.

Why this product is good

  • Cubasis has a user-friendly interface and a wide range of features like MIDI, touch instruments, and effects. It is designed for iOS and Android, making it easily accessible for mobile users. The platform supports multiple tracks, offers high-quality audio processing, and integrates well with other music software.

Recommended for

    Cubasis is recommended for music producers and musicians who want to create and edit music on mobile devices. It is suitable for both beginners and experienced users who need a portable music production solution.

Material Maker videos

Material Maker 0.8 Released -- Now with more better!

More videos:

  • Review - Material Maker -- Godot Powered Procedural Texture Creator (Free & Open Source!)
  • Review - Material Maker & Pixelorama -- Godot Powered Open Source GameDev Goodness!

Cubasis videos

Can you write REAL music on an iPad? CUBASIS 3 [REVIEW]

More videos:

  • Review - Cubasis 3 iOS | Verdict after ONE week (iPad/iPhone)
  • Review - Cubasis 3 First Impressions: Overview, New Features And More

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Material Maker and Cubasis)
3D
100 100%
0% 0
Music
0 0%
100% 100
Architecture
100 100%
0% 0
Audio & Music
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Material Maker and Cubasis. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Material Maker and Cubasis

Material Maker Reviews

We have no reviews of Material Maker yet.
Be the first one to post

Cubasis Reviews

10 Best GarageBand Alternatives for Android
If you are completely into music production and willing to spend almost 25$ to get a powerful DAW, then you should get your hands on Cubasis 3. Just like FL Studio, itโ€™s a full-fledged digital music studio that gives you a desktop DAW-like feel on the small screen. It has endless numbers of MIDI and audio tracks, over 120 virtual instruments, a mixer with 17 effects...
Best Music Making Apps for Android 2023: The Essential Guide
At last, Cubasis has made it onto Android. Itโ€™s easily one of the best mobile platform DAWs out there and now more people can get into it on Android and Chrome OS. This is the real deal, although there are some great alternatives.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Material Maker seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Material Maker mentions (8)

  • Underw[A]ter [OC]
    In a software called material maker, this is the setup(slightly different but this basically just offsets the textures). Source: about 3 years ago
  • Godot showing off a texture I made in material maker
    Did you find it? Here it is if you didn't. It's made in Godot. Source: over 3 years ago
  • How would you go about modeling this?
    โ€œName your own priceโ€ alternative based on the Godot engine https://rodzilla.itch.io/material-maker. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Helmet Hud Test Godot 4 FPS
    Helmet overlay was made using material maker. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Has anyone been able to run Substance Designer on the steam deck?
    No idea about that one but Material Maker works great! Source: about 4 years ago
View more

Cubasis mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Cubasis yet. Tracking of Cubasis recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Material Maker and Cubasis, you can also consider the following products

Substance Designer - Substance Designer is a node-based non-destructive application for material authoring.

SunVox - SunVox is a small, fast and powerful modular synthesizer with pattern based sequencer (tracker).

TextureLab - Free, Cross-Platform, GPU-Accelerated Procedural Texture Generator.

FamiStudio - FamiStudio is very simple music editor for the Nintendo Entertainment System or Famicom. It is designed to be easier to use than FamiTracker, but its feature set is also much more limited.

Filter Forge - On the surface, Filter Forge is just a Photoshop plugin, a pack of filters that generate textures...

MOTU Digital Performer - Get inspired, then refine your mix โ€” all in a singular workflow.