Uptime monitoring, status pages, and error tracking that show every region's reading, not one green dot. Flat pricing, no per-subscriber fees, real free tier.
sponsored
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, MASSCAN
seems to be a lot more popular than ShellNewHandler.
While we know about 31 links to MASSCAN,
we've tracked only 2 mentions of ShellNewHandler.
social mentions
31 vs 2
Monitoring Tools popularity
90% vs 10%
Base details
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
Speed MASSCAN is known for its incredibly fast scanning capabilities, capable of scanning the entire Internet in under 6 minutes. It achieves this speed by sending packets asynchronously and using highly efficient network code.
Scalability The tool is highly scalable and can be used to scan large network ranges. It supports a range of port scanning methods, which makes it a versatile choice for different network environments.
Customizability MASSCAN allows users to customize their scanning tasks through extensive configuration options, including the ability to define specific ports, IP ranges, and rate limits, which can be tailored to meet specific project needs.
Cross-Platform MASSCAN is cross-platform and can be compiled and run on various operating systems, including Linux, Windows, and macOS, which makes it accessible to a wide range of users.
Possible disadvantages
Lack of Detail While MASSCAN is excellent for fast scans and identifying open ports, it doesn't offer detailed service information or insights that more in-depth tools like Nmap provide, requiring supplementary tools for comprehensive scans.
Risk of Network Disruption Due to its high-speed scanning capabilities, MASSCAN can potentially overwhelm network devices or trigger firewalls and intrusion detection systems, posing a risk of network disruption if not managed carefully.
Requires Advanced Networking Knowledge The tool is designed for users with advanced networking knowledge, as improper configuration or use can result in inaccurate results or unintended network issues.
Legal and Ethical Concerns MASSCAN's ability to rapidly scan large network ranges can lead to legal and ethical concerns if used without proper authorization, making it essential for users to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
No features have been listed yet.
Analysis
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.
MASSCANShellNewHandler
No analysis of MASSCAN yet.
Overall verdict
ShellNewHandler is a niche, lightweight utility hosted on SourceForge designed to give users more control over the Windows 'New' context menu (the ShellNew menu). It can be considered good for its specific narrow use case, but it is an older, minimally maintained tool that may not suit all users, especially those on modern Windows versions.
Why this product is good
Provides direct control over customizing the Windows right-click 'New' menu, allowing users to add or remove file type entries
Lightweight and free, without bundled bloatware typical of some other free utilities
Simple and focused in scope, making it easy to understand for its specific purpose
Open distribution via SourceForge allows transparency and no-cost access
Recommended for
Power users who want to declutter or customize the Windows New context menu
IT administrators managing standardized desktop environments across multiple machines
Users comfortable with older utility-style tools and Windows registry-related tweaks
Not recommended for casual users seeking modern, actively supported software with regular updates
Masscan has a capacity of as much as 1.6 million packets per second on its Linux version. That is not all, Masscan can scale up to a hundred million packets per second on a computer that is rigged with eight 10 Gpbs...
By default, Masscan’s scan rate is 100,000 packets-per-second. The macOS or Windows version of this tool can be set to 300,000 packets-per-second. On Linux, Masscan can do 1.6 million packets-per-second. But it can...
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.
MASSCAN31 mentionsShellNewHandler2 mentions
Love C, Hate C: Web Framework Memory Problems
Agree re: no need for heap allocation - for others: I recommend reading thru whole masscan source (https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan), it's a pleasure btw - iirc rather few/sparse malloc()s which are part of regular I/O...
- Source: Hacker News
/
about 1 year ago
Battleship sounds like a good analogy, but is very different because you don't have other options to "secure your ship" besides obscurity. If you had other options, let's say a sonar or moving your ship, they would definitely be used...
- Source: Hacker News
/
over 1 year ago
I recently got libreoffice, but now the new option in right click looks like a mess. Can someone help me get rid of them please?
Use Shell New Handler. Run the portable app and simply untick the items you don't want to appear in your new context menu.
Source:
about 4 years ago
This menu should be easy to add/remove programs to... Who is really creating Access Databases from this menu often enough to keep it here? (Not me!) Is there an easy way to edit this?
I've always used ShellNewHandler for this. It's a really simple portable utility that allows you to remove most of the items from that menu. Tested it out on Windows 11 and it's still compatible.
Source:
over 5 years ago
Alternatives to MASSCAN and ShellNewHandler
When comparing MASSCAN and ShellNewHandler, you can also consider the following products.
Advanced IP Scanner
ZMap
Nmap
Winsock Packet Editor
Scapy
