Software Alternatives & Startups

Mas CLI VS zerobrew

Compare Mas CLI VS zerobrew and see what are their differences

Mas CLI

Mac App Store command line interface

Rating
0 reviews
zerobrew

A 5-20x faster experimental Homebrew alternative. Contribute to lucasgelfond/zerobrew development by creating an account on GitHub.

No screenshot yet
Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Mas CLI seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 16 times since March 2021.

social mentions
16 vs 0
Front End Package Manager popularity
69% vs 31%
alternatives listed
27 vs 28

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Mas CLI
zerobrew
Website github.com github.com
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Mas CLI 4 features
zerobrew 5 features
  • Convenience
    Mas CLI allows users to easily manage macOS App Store applications from the command line, which can be more convenient and faster for those familiar with terminal operations compared to navigating the App Store GUI.
  • Automation
    The ability to script installations and updates with Mas CLI enables automation of tasks, making it a powerful tool for system administrators and power users to manage app deployments and updates across multiple machines.
  • Efficiency
    Mas CLI can handle batch operations efficiently, allowing users to install and update multiple applications in one command, saving time and reducing manual effort.
  • Version Control
    Users can specify specific app versions to install or downgrade to desired versions, providing more control over the application's lifecycle and compatibility.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to Mac App Store
    Mas CLI only works with applications from the macOS App Store, which means it cannot manage or manipulate applications downloaded from other sources.
  • Dependency on Mas Support
    Any changes or updates in the macOS App Store’s API or authentication methods could affect the functionality of Mas CLI, making it potentially less reliable if not frequently updated by the community.
  • Lack of GUI
    While command-line functionality can be powerful, the lack of a graphical user interface may deter users unfamiliar with terminal operations, limiting its ease of use for less technical users.
  • Feature Limitations
    Mas CLI may not support all features of the Mac App Store, such as in-app purchases, subscriptions, or interactive app handling, potentially requiring hybrid use of both CLI and GUI.
  • Simplified Package Management
    Zerobrew aims to streamline the process of installing and managing packages, potentially reducing complexity compared to traditional package managers like Homebrew.
  • Lightweight Design
    As a minimal alternative, Zerobrew may offer a lighter footprint, avoiding some of the overhead associated with larger package management systems.
  • Open Source
    Being open source allows developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to the codebase, fostering community collaboration and transparency.
  • Learning Resource
    For developers interested in understanding package manager internals, Zerobrew can serve as an educational tool to learn how such systems are built from scratch.
  • Potential for Customization
    Users with specific needs may find it easier to customize or extend Zerobrew due to its smaller and more focused codebase compared to established tools.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Maturity
    As a newer or less established project, Zerobrew may lack the extensive testing, stability, and reliability that comes with more mature package managers.
  • Smaller Community and Support
    Compared to widely-used tools like Homebrew, Zerobrew likely has a smaller user base, resulting in less community support, fewer tutorials, and slower issue resolution.
  • Fewer Packages Available
    The package repository or ecosystem for Zerobrew is probably much smaller than established package managers, limiting the software available for installation.
  • Potential for Bugs and Incomplete Features
    Newer projects often have unresolved bugs or missing features that more established alternatives have already addressed through years of development.
  • Uncertain Long-term Viability
    Without a large user base or corporate backing, there's a risk that Zerobrew could become unmaintained or abandoned over time, posing risks for long-term reliance.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Mas CLI
zerobrew
69% 69%
31% 31%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Mas CLI and zerobrew. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Mas CLI 16 mentions
zerobrew 0 mentions
  • A 100x faster* alternative to homebrew
    Directory specific tools (versioned if necessary) that are managed in declarative fashion is great. I use Brewfile too. Still prefer some stuff to be managed by brew. For example the browsers, App Store apps (managed via mas[1]) [1]... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • From Fresh Mac to Productive in 30 Minutes
    I always thought Mac App Store apps couldn't be automated. Turns out, there's a tool called mas (Mac App Store CLI) that allows you to automate installation of Mac App Store apps. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Microsoft wants Windows Update to handle all apps
    MacOS has a graphical AppStore but no easy way to run an update from command line. There's third-party project - mas[1] but it's limited by Apple constantly changing APIs. [1] - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

View more

Tracking zerobrew since Sep 2026.

Alternatives to Mas CLI and zerobrew

When comparing Mas CLI and zerobrew, you can also consider the following products.