Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

MapR VS CMake

Compare MapR VS CMake and see what are their differences

MapR

MapR is a leading high-performance data management or IT management solution that integrates Apache Drill, Hadoop and Spark with real-time global event streaming, scalable enterprise storage, and database capabilities in order to control large appli…

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
CMake

CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Taverlo
Check your business domain’s public DMARC and SPF records free. Ongoing monitoring is free for one domain; $29/month covers up to five. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, CMake seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 55 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 55
Monitoring Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
80 vs 112

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

MapR
CMake
Website mapr.com cmake.org
Listed in
Data Integration Log Management Monitoring Tools Git +1
Front End Package Manager JavaScript Package Manager JS Build Tools Package Manager +1

About MapR and CMake

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

MapR
CMake

No description of MapR yet.

We recommend LibHunt CMake for discovery and comparisons of trending CMake projects.

Read more about CMake

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

MapR 6 features
CMake 5 features
  • High Performance
    MapR provides high-performance handling of data with extremely low-latency analytics, ideal for large-scale data operations.
  • Multi-Model Data Support
    Supports multiple data models including JSON, time series, and wide-column, enabling versatility in handling various types of data feeds.
  • Robust Security Features
    Offers advanced security features including data encryption, access control, and network security to ensure data protection.
  • Scalability
    Easily scales to accommodate petabyte-scale data across numerous nodes, making it suitable for growing enterprises.
  • Integrated Data Fabric
    The MapR Data Platform offers a unified data fabric that facilitates seamless data management across cloud, on-premises, and edge environments.
  • Support for Containers and Kubernetes
    Provides support for modern applications using containers and orchestration tools like Kubernetes, fostering flexibility in deployment.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Setup
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex and time-consuming, requiring specialized knowledge and skills.
  • Cost
    MapR can be expensive, especially for smaller companies or startups, due to licensing and infrastructure costs.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    There is a steep learning curve for new users unfamiliar with its ecosystem, which can hinder quick adoption.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Dependence on proprietary technology may lead to vendor lock-in, making migrations to other platforms challenging.
  • Eco-System Compatibility
    Compatibility issues may arise with other big data tools and platforms, potentially limiting integration options.
  • Support Limitations
    While comprehensive, support and documentation sometimes lag behind newer features and updates, which can be an impediment.
  • Cross-platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This allows developers to write platform-independent CMake scripts.
  • Build tool agnostic
    CMake can generate build files for a variety of build systems including Makefiles, Ninja, and Visual Studio solutions. This means developers are not tied to a specific build tool.
  • Large community and extensive documentation
    CMake has a large user base and an extensive amount of documentation and tutorials available which can be helpful for new and experienced users alike.
  • Integrated testing support
    CMake includes support for testing frameworks such as CTest, which allows for automated testing of code during the build process.
  • Modular and scalable
    CMake is highly modular, enabling users to create reusable and maintainable code by organizing CMake scripts into libraries and modules.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep learning curve
    CMake's complexity and its extensive range of features can be difficult for beginners to grasp, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Verbose syntax
    CMake scripts can often become verbose and difficult to read, especially for large projects. This can make maintenance and debugging challenging.
  • Inconsistent module quality
    The quality and support of different CMake modules can vary, sometimes leading to issues with compatibility or functionality.
  • Performance overhead
    CMake may introduce some performance overhead during the configuration process, especially for very large projects.
  • Complexity in advanced features
    Some of the more advanced features of CMake, such as custom commands and complex dependency management, can be quite difficult to implement correctly.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

MapR
CMake

Overall verdict

  • Since its acquisition by HPE in 2019, MapR has transitioned into the HPE Ezmeral platform. This may affect its independent applicability, but its technology foundation remains solid, and organizations using HPE Ezmeral products might benefit from MapR's original capabilities. However, current users should evaluate HPE's roadmap and support offerings as part of their assessment.

Why this product is good

  • MapR was known for its robust, enterprise-grade data platform designed to handle a wide variety of data-intensive applications. It provided features like strong data processing capabilities, real-time analytics, and a scalable infrastructure, making it suitable for companies looking to manage large datasets efficiently. Additionally, MapR's integration capabilities with various data processing tools and its support for multiple workloads were seen as significant advantages.

Recommended for

  • Enterprises needing a scalable and resilient data platform
  • Organizations interested in real-time analytics and data processing
  • Companies already within the HPE ecosystem looking for integration
  • Businesses requiring robust support for big data applications

Overall verdict

  • CMake is generally considered a good tool for managing the build process of software projects, especially those with a complex codebase that spans multiple platforms.

Why this product is good

  • Flexibility
    It offers great flexibility in terms of defining build processes, enabling advanced configuration and optimization techniques to be used.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with many popular IDEs and other tools, providing a smoother development experience.
  • Wide adoption
    CMake is widely used in the industry, which leads to robust community support and regular updates.
  • Cross platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple platforms, which makes it highly valuable for projects that need to be compiled and run on different operating systems.

Recommended for

  • projects requiring cross-platform compatibility
  • developers looking for a powerful build configuration tool
  • complex software projects with numerous dependencies
  • teams that value strong community and industry support

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

MapR 3 videos + Add
CMake 3 videos + Add

Hadoop Distribution Comparison and Overview: Cloudera, MapR, and Hortonworks

More videos

  • - The Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything (sponsored by MapR) - Ted Dunning (MapR)
  • - Big Data & Brews: Tomer Shiran of MapR Talks About the Hadoop Market and the Company's Success

CMake for Dummies

More videos

  • - CppCon 2017: Mathieu Ropert “Using Modern CMake Patterns to Enforce a Good Modular Design”
  • - Hunter, a CMake driven package manager for C/C++ projects - Daniel Friedrich - Lightning Talks

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
MapR
CMake
100% 100%
Monitoring Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
Front End Package Manager
100% 100%
100% 100%
Business & Commerce
0% 0%
0% 0%
JS Build Tools
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using MapR and CMake. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

MapR 0 mentions
CMake 55 mentions

Tracking MapR since Mar 2021.

  • How I deployed my first project for my devops portfolio: Project Architecture
    I used CMAKE as my compiling tool followed by make. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • DeadLock: Research Results & Tech Stack
    All this C++ project can't be ran as simple C++ code, so I will be building this whole package using CMake. It will streamline building this project onto other computers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Master This Feature of DevEco Studio to Efficiently Implement ArkTS and C++ Glue Code
    For knowledge in this aspect, you can refer to the relevant documents of the CMake build tool: https://cmake.org/. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

View more

Alternatives to MapR and CMake

When comparing MapR and CMake, you can also consider the following products.

  • Cryptlex

    Cryptlex is an IT Management software, designed to help you maximize the revenue potential of your software by protecting you against software piracy.

    Compare Cryptlex to MapR or CMake:

    Cryptlex vs MapR Cryptlex vs CMake
  • GNU Make

    GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

    Compare GNU Make to MapR or CMake:

    GNU Make vs MapR GNU Make vs CMake
  • Git

    Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.

    Compare Git to MapR or CMake:

    Git vs MapR Git vs CMake
  • SCons

    SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

    Compare SCons to MapR or CMake:

    SCons vs MapR SCons vs CMake
  • Boomi

    The #1 Integration Cloud - Build Integrations anytime, anywhere with no coding required using Dell Boomi's industry leading iPaaS platform.

    Compare Boomi to MapR or CMake:

    Boomi vs MapR Boomi vs CMake
  • SBT

    SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.

    Compare SBT to MapR or CMake:

    SBT vs MapR SBT vs CMake
Loading...