
OpenClaw
ChatGPT
Claude by Anthropic
Bardeen
Claude AI
Manus AI
Airtop
AI agent bridges thoughts and actions, excelling in work and life tasks like personalized travel, stock analysis, insurance comparisons, and supplier sourcing, autonomously completing tasks and providing insights while users rest.

Keygen
The simplest way to license your app.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Keylight.dev should be more popular than Manus. It has been mentioned 4 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | manus.im | keylight.dev |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from Belgium · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Manus yet.
Keylight sits between your payment provider and your app. Licenses, activations, customers, and usage all live here. Switch providers, or run several, without shipping a new build.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Manus AI Agent Review | The Ultimate AI Intelligent Tool?
More videos
No Keylight.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Manus and Keylight.dev.
Keylight.dev's answer:
Keylight keeps app licensing separate from payments. You can use Stripe, Paddle, Lemon Squeezy, Polar, Gumroad, or your own checkout without tying your app to one provider.
It handles license keys, device activations, trials, free tiers, offline access, grace periods, and signed license state through one SDK.
Keylight.dev's answer:
My goal is to make all apps work with Keylight. So all of your licenses, from any types of apps, is going through Keylight for analytics, customer portal, support, ...
Most licensing tools are bundled into a payment provider. Keylight is built as an independent licensing layer.
That means you can change payment providers, sell through multiple platforms, or change your pricing model without rebuilding licensing inside your app.
It also gives developers a ready-made SDK and dashboard instead of requiring them to build and maintain their own licensing backend.
Keylight.dev's answer:
Keylight is primarily built for independent developers and software companies selling apps directly to customers.
Its main audience includes:
macOS and iOS developers Web app and SaaS developers Developers selling outside app stores Teams migrating from a payment provider’s built-in licensing Developers who need trials, device limits, offline access, and license analytics
Keylight.dev's answer:
Keylight started because I kept rebuilding the same licensing systems for different apps: license keys, trials, activations, offline access, device changes, and all the edge cases that come with them.
I also did not want licensing to be controlled by whichever payment provider an app happened to use.
So I built Keylight as a standalone layer between the app and the payment provider. Payment platforms send events to Keylight, and the app receives one consistent license state through the SDK.
Keylight.dev's answer:
That's confidential.
Keylight.dev's answer:
Swift and Swift Package Manager for the Apple SDK Rust SDK / JS SDK / C# SDK / C++ SDK TypeScript React Next.js Stripe Connect and payment-provider webhooks Cryptographic signatures for secure, offline-capable licenses REST APIs for application and provider integrations
Share your experience with using Manus and Keylight.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Manus Team — Four framework rebuilds for context engineering. manus.im. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
2025 has been dubbed the "Year of the Agent" by investors and tech media. Companies like Manus, Lovart, Fellou, and many others have captured headlines with their AI agent applications, which are software systems that can autonomously... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
You don't want to hand-roll Ed25519 and lease parsing. Most licensing SDKs hide this behind a couple of calls. With Keylight, for example, the offline path collapses to: activate once, then a local checkOnLaunch() that verifies the lease... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Full disclosure: I now build Keylight, so weigh this accordingly — I'm telling you the seam it's designed for, not that it wins every row. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Full docs and the free tier are at keylight.dev. If you're on Tauri or Electron instead of native Swift, the same SDK pattern exists in JS/Rust. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
When comparing Manus and Keylight.dev, you can also consider the following products.

The AI that actually does things. Your personal assistant on any platform.
Compare OpenClaw to Manus or Keylight.dev:

A dead-simple software licensing API built for developers
Compare Keygen to Manus or Keylight.dev:

ChatGPT is a powerful, open-source language model.
Compare ChatGPT to Manus or Keylight.dev:
A family of foundational AI models
Compare Claude by Anthropic to Manus or Keylight.dev:


Claude is a next generation AI assistant built for work and trained to be safe, accurate, and secure. An AI assistant from Anthropic.
Compare Claude AI to Manus or Keylight.dev: