Software Alternatives & Startups

MakeWPFast VS cppq

Compare MakeWPFast VS cppq and see what are their differences

MakeWPFast

MakeWPFast is a WordPress performance lab. We benchmark 35,000+ plugins and 200+ themes for their real backend impact - autoload bloat, slow database queries, PHP memory - and publish the measured data others ignore.

Rating
0 reviews
cppq

Simple, reliable & efficient distributed task queue for C++

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, MakeWPFast seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2 vs 0
WordPress popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

MakeWPFast
cppq
Website makewpfast.com github.com
Platforms
Wordpress
—
Company Startup from Poland · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 —
Listed in —

About MakeWPFast and cppq

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

MakeWPFast
cppq

MakeWPFast is a WordPress performance lab focused on the backend bottlenecks that caching plugins and CDNs can't fix. While 90% of WordPress speed advice is about the frontend — compressing images, minifying CSS, adding cache layers — the real slowdown usually lives deeper: bloated wp_options...

Read more about MakeWPFast

No description of cppq yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

MakeWPFast 4 features
cppq 5 features
  • 35,000+ Plugin Benchmarks
    Every plugin is installed in a controlled environment and measured for its real impact on database queries, wp_options autoload size, and page load time — then given a speed score.
  • Plugin & Theme Comparisons
    580+ head-to-head comparisons and 200+ themes tested, so you can pick the faster option before installing it.
  • Error Guides & Research
    19 diagnostic guides plus an in-depth blog covering database optimization, slow-query diagnostics, and server configuration.
  • Data-Driven, Not Opinion
    Every entry is backed by reproducible benchmark data — before/after deltas, not generic "install a caching plugin" advice.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    High-quality optimization services can be relatively expensive, potentially limiting access for individuals or small businesses with limited budgets.
  • Dependent on Service
    Relying on an external service can create dependency, which could be problematic if the service is discontinued or if there are communication issues.
  • Learning Curve
    Users may need to invest time to understand the recommendations and implementations suggested by MakeWPFast to maintain optimized performance over time.
  • Specific Scope
    While MakeWPFast focuses on speed optimization, it may not address other broader website maintenance or development needs that a site owner might have.
  • Lightweight C++ implementation
    cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
  • Redis-backed reliability
    Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
  • Inspired by proven design (asynq)
    The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
  • Native integration for C++ projects
    For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
  • Open source and inspectable
    Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited maturity and battle-testing
    Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
  • Smaller community and ecosystem
    Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
  • Documentation gaps
    As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
  • C++ build and dependency complexity
    Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
  • Fewer built-in features and tooling
    cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

MakeWPFast
cppq

Overall verdict

  • MakeWPFast appears to be a WordPress performance optimization service that can help speed up slow websites, though you should verify current reviews and offerings directly before committing.

Why this product is good

  • Focuses specifically on WordPress speed optimization, which is a common pain point for site owners
  • Faster load times can improve user experience, SEO rankings, and conversion rates
  • Specialized services often address technical issues like caching, image optimization, and database cleanup that general hosts may not
  • Can save time for non-technical users who don't want to handle performance tuning themselves

Recommended for

  • WordPress site owners struggling with slow page load times
  • Bloggers and small businesses wanting better SEO and user experience
  • E-commerce stores where speed directly impacts sales and conversions
  • Non-technical users who prefer outsourcing performance optimization to specialists

Overall verdict

  • cppq is a lightweight, Redis-backed distributed task queue for C++ inspired by Go's popular 'asynq' library. It's a good choice for developers who need a simple, dependency-light job queue system in C++ without the overhead of larger enterprise messaging systems, though it's a smaller, less battle-tested project compared to mature alternatives.

Why this product is good

  • Simple and lightweight design makes it easy to understand and integrate into existing C++ projects
  • Built on Redis, a well-established and reliable backend for queue storage, giving it a solid foundation
  • Inspired by asynq (a proven Go library), so the design patterns and task queue semantics are based on a well-thought-out model
  • Open source on GitHub, allowing developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code
  • Good fit for projects already using Redis, minimizing the need for additional infrastructure
  • Straightforward API for enqueueing and processing background jobs in C++ applications

Recommended for

  • C++ developers needing a background job/task queue without adopting a heavyweight message broker
  • Projects already using Redis as part of their infrastructure
  • Small to medium-sized applications requiring asynchronous task processing
  • Teams comfortable working with less mainstream or smaller open-source libraries and willing to contribute or debug issues themselves
  • Developers familiar with asynq (Go) looking for a similar pattern in C++
  • Prototyping or hobby projects where a minimal task queue solution is sufficient

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
MakeWPFast
cppq
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using MakeWPFast and cppq. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

MakeWPFast 2 mentions
cppq 0 mentions
  • Which of Your Plugins Is the Heaviest? Now You Can See It on the Plugins Page.
    The data comes from makewpfast.com, where we benchmark plugins in isolated Docker containers. No caching, no interference from other plugins, just a clean WordPress install with one plugin active at a time. We measure memory and queries,... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • I Benchmarked 4,999 WordPress Plugins for Speed. Here Are the Results.
    The full database is free to search at makewpfast.com. No signup, no paywall. Look up any of the 4,999 tested plugins before you install them. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.

Alternatives to MakeWPFast and cppq

When comparing MakeWPFast and cppq, you can also consider the following products.