Software Alternatives & Startups

Makers.so VS Digraph.dev

Compare Makers.so VS Digraph.dev and see what are their differences

Makers.so

A website builder inside Figma.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium Free trial $12 / Monthly (Per custom domain site)
Digraph.dev

AI marketing platform for brands.

No screenshot yet
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium Free trial $99 / Monthly
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Makers.so seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 4 times since March 2021.

social mentions
4 vs 0
Design Tools popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
126 vs 1

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Makers.so
Digraph.dev
Website makers.so digraph.dev
Pricing
Freemium Free trial $12 / Monthly (Per custom domain site) Official pricing
Freemium Free trial $99 / Monthly Official pricing
Platforms
Figma Web Browser Safari +1
—
Company 2022 Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees
Listed in

About Makers.so and Digraph.dev

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Makers.so
Digraph.dev

Makers.so is a Figma plugin to help you build and publish your own designs without ever leaving Figma. Perfect for simple sites like portfolios, landing pages or resumes. No more "Figma to Webflow" or "Figma to code".

Read more about Makers.so

Digraph is an AI marketing platform for brands. It brings together AI research, market intelligence, website and campaign analysis, specialist AI workflows, and marketer-led guidance to help teams understand what shapes buyer decisions and what to do next. Teams can measure how AI systems...

Read more about Digraph.dev

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Makers.so 7 features
Digraph.dev 5 features
  • From Figma to Site
  • No Code
  • Fully responsive
  • Custom Domains
  • Unlimited Pages
  • Automatic SSL (https)
  • Live Site Preview
  • Developer-focused positioning
    The .dev domain and branding suggest a tool built for developers and technical teams, so its workflows are likely to fit engineering needs better than a generic product. I could not browse the site, so this is inferred from its positioning rather than confirmed.
  • Graph-based approach
    The name 'Digraph' (directed graph) suggests it models information as connected nodes and relationships. That kind of structure can make dependencies, ideas, or decisions easier to see than flat lists or documents. Confirm how the product actually uses this.
  • Modern, minimal presentation
    Newer developer tools tend to have lean interfaces and a focused feature set, which can mean a short learning curve and less clutter. I could not verify this for Digraph, so check it with a trial.
  • Potential for better organization and clarity
    If the tool works as the name suggests, visualizing relationships between items can improve shared understanding across a team. The benefit depends on how well the product is executed.
  • Early-stage responsiveness
    Smaller or newer products often respond quickly to user feedback and let users influence the roadmap. This is a general tendency and has not been verified for Digraph.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Makers.so 2 videos + Add
Digraph.dev 0 videos + Add

From Figma to Site in 60 seconds • makers.so

More videos

  • - Publish your Figma Designs to Custom Domain Without Ever Leaving Figma

No Digraph.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Makers.so
Digraph.dev
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Makers.so and Digraph.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Makers.so 4 mentions
Digraph.dev 0 mentions
  • What’s the role of YJS behind the scenes?
    If we go based on what yjs and other top class entertainers have said, I think they recommend but they are not the final decision makers.so he has sway but he isnt the final decision maker. Source: over 3 years ago
  • " Icon Duck " Pretty good icons set library plugin for figma
    There many plugins that help you to do that Check these following list 1- figmq makers sites 2- Figma to framer HTML 3-builder.io 4-webflow plugin for figma. Source: over 3 years ago
  • What Figma Plugin / Feature are you missing?
    This one seems really clever: https://makers.so/. Source: almost 4 years ago

View more

Tracking Digraph.dev since Oct 2026.

Alternatives to Makers.so and Digraph.dev

When comparing Makers.so and Digraph.dev, you can also consider the following products.