Makerkit.dev's answer

Indie Hackers and Companies who want to launch quickly, without compromising on quality.

StackSwap's answer:

B2B SaaS founders, RevOps leads, and Heads of Sales / Marketing / Revenue at companies in the 10-200 employee range — typically post-seed, pre-Series-B — where the GTM stack has grown organically and nobody owns the audit. Common trigger: a board meeting where someone asks "are we paying for tools we don't use?"

Also: buyers evaluating the SaaS spend management category who want a directional read before sitting through enterprise sales cycles.

Makerkit.dev's answer

Makerkit uses Next.js 15 (App Router), Supabase, React.js, Typescript and Stripe.

StackSwap's answer:

Next.js 14 (App Router) on Vercel, TypeScript, Supabase (Postgres + Auth + Storage), Stripe for billing, Anthropic's Claude API for LLM-assisted analysis, Sentry for observability.

Built deliberately on a thin stack — the irony of running a tool-overlap audit on 30 SaaS subscriptions wasn't lost on me.

Makerkit.dev's answer

Makerkit stands out by offering a truly modular architecture built with Turborepo, where core features like auth, billing, and notifications live in their own packages for better maintainability.

While most starters lock you into specific patterns or providers, Makerkit gives you flexibility with a multi-account system supporting both B2B and B2C scenarios, provider-agnostic billing, and edge-ready deployment options.

Beyond the basics, it includes production-ready features like multi-factor auth, real-time notifications, and team permissions - all built with Supabase, TypeScript, React Query, and modern tooling to make development a genuine pleasure.

StackSwap's answer:

Most SaaS spend tools — Vendr, Zylo, Productiv, BetterCloud — require integrations with billing, SSO, or HRIS before they tell you anything. They're heavyweight onboarded platforms. StackSwap is the opposite: drop in your tool list, get a structured audit in ~60 seconds, no integration. Overlap surfaced by category, with keep / replace / remove calls. It's the diagnostic step before the platform commitment, not a replacement for it.

Makerkit.dev's answer

While other starters give you basic auth and a dashboard, Makerkit provides a genuinely modular foundation with the real features SaaS products need - like multi-factor auth, team permissions, real-time notifications, and provider-agnostic billing, all organized in clean, maintainable packages using Turborepo.

You get a first-class developer experience with TypeScript, React Query, and modern tooling, plus the flexibility to support both B2B and B2C scenarios, different payment providers, and edge deployment options.

Best of all, Makerkit is actively maintained with regular updates and responsive support, so you're building on a foundation that grows with your needs rather than painting yourself into a corner.

StackSwap's answer:

Two reasons:

1. Speed. SaaS Management Platforms take 2-6 weeks to onboard and another 30-60 days to surface useful insights. StackSwap takes 60 seconds. Different product class.

2. Cost. SMP contracts start around $20k/yr. The free Stackscan covers most of what a founder or RevOps lead needs to start the consolidation conversation.

Honest take: if you're already running an SMP and getting value, keep it. StackSwap is the faster diagnostic, not the replacement. If you're shopping the SMP category, run StackSwap first to see what you actually need before sitting through five demos.

StackSwap's answer:

I spent 10 years in B2B SaaS sales — BDR through Head of Revenue — selling into hundreds of mid-market and enterprise teams. I watched companies pay six figures a year for two competing data enrichment tools because nobody owned the audit and nobody wanted to fight the renewal motion.

StackSwap is the tool I would've hated to face as a vendor on the renewal call: free, fast, takes the buyer's side, names overlap by name. The category I sold in for a decade gets auditable.