Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Macro Deck VS ManualTesting.dev

Compare Macro Deck VS ManualTesting.dev and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Macro Deck logo Macro Deck

Use smartphone as macropad for pc

ManualTesting.dev logo ManualTesting.dev

Manual Testing for Developers - Test Management Tool for developers and startups
  • Macro Deck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-30
  • ManualTesting.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-26

Macro Deck features and specs

  • Customizability
    Macro Deck allows users to create and customize their own button layouts and actions, providing a high level of personalization to fit specific user needs and workflows.
  • Cost-effective
    Macro Deck is available for free, making it an attractive option for users who need a powerful macro tool without the expense associated with commercial alternatives.
  • Plugin Support
    The platform supports plugins, enabling the integration of additional features and functionalities that extend the application's capabilities.
  • Cross-platform Compatibility
    Macro Deck can be used on multiple devices including Windows and Android, allowing for flexibility in how users interact with the software.
  • Easy Setup
    The software is relatively simple to set up, making it accessible to users who may not have advanced technical skills.

Possible disadvantages of Macro Deck

  • Limited iOS Support
    Macro Deck does not currently offer native support for iOS devices, which can be a limitation for users heavily reliant on Apple products.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its ease of use, new users might encounter a learning curve while familiarizing themselves with the wide array of functions and customization options.
  • Reliability
    As with many open-source or free applications, users may experience occasional bugs or stability issues that can affect reliability.
  • Community-driven Development
    The development and support of the software rely heavily on the community, which may result in slower updates and less immediate customer support compared to commercial options.

ManualTesting.dev features and specs

  • Focused on Manual Testing
    ManualTesting.dev is specifically dedicated to manual testing, providing a niche resource for QA professionals who need to strengthen their manual testing skills rather than being overwhelmed by automation-focused content.
  • Beginner-Friendly
    The platform appears designed to be accessible for those new to software testing, offering foundational knowledge and guidance that helps newcomers enter the QA field without requiring prior technical expertise.
  • Structured Learning Path
    The site offers organized content that guides learners through manual testing concepts in a logical progression, making it easier to build knowledge incrementally rather than jumping between disconnected topics.
  • Practical and Job-Oriented
    The platform focuses on practical, real-world manual testing skills that are directly applicable to job roles, helping testers prepare for actual work scenarios and interviews in QA positions.
  • Free or Affordable Access
    ManualTesting.dev provides accessible content without significant financial barriers, making it a cost-effective option for individuals looking to learn manual testing without investing in expensive courses or certifications.

Possible disadvantages of ManualTesting.dev

  • Limited Scope
    By focusing exclusively on manual testing, the platform may not adequately prepare testers for the modern QA landscape where automation skills are increasingly expected and valued by employers.
  • Relatively Unknown Platform
    ManualTesting.dev is not as well-established or widely recognized as major learning platforms like Udemy, Coursera, or ISTQB resources, which may limit community support and peer interaction.
  • Limited Advanced Content
    The platform may lack depth for experienced QA professionals looking for advanced testing methodologies, complex test strategy development, or specialized domain testing knowledge.
  • Smaller Community
    Compared to larger testing communities like Ministry of Testing or Software Testing Help, the platform likely has a smaller user base, resulting in fewer discussion opportunities, peer reviews, and networking possibilities.
  • Content Freshness Concerns
    As a smaller, niche website, there may be concerns about how frequently the content is updated to reflect current industry trends, tools, and best practices in manual testing.

Analysis of ManualTesting.dev

Overall verdict

  • ManualTesting.dev appears to be a niche resource site focused on manual testing concepts, tutorials, and interview preparation for QA professionals. It's a solid, budget-friendly (often free) option for learners wanting to build foundational manual testing skills, though it may lack the depth, interactivity, or certification value of paid, structured courses.

Why this product is good

  • Provides free or low-cost access to manual testing concepts and materials, making it accessible for beginners
  • Focuses specifically on manual testing, offering targeted content rather than generic QA overviews
  • Often includes practical examples, sample test cases, and interview questions useful for job seekers
  • Simple, straightforward format that's easy to digest without needing extensive technical setup
  • Useful as a supplementary study resource alongside other QA learning platforms

Recommended for

  • Beginners entering the QA/software testing field looking for foundational knowledge
  • Job seekers preparing for manual testing interview questions
  • Students or self-learners who want free supplementary material on testing concepts
  • QA professionals needing a quick refresher on manual testing fundamentals
  • Those on a tight budget who can't afford premium testing courses or bootcamps

Macro Deck videos

Turn your Android phone into an Elgato Stream Deck! - Macro Deck Tutorial

More videos:

  • Review - FREE STREAM DECK ALTERNATIVE for the Elgato Stream Deck! Macro Deck Android App Review 2020

ManualTesting.dev videos

No ManualTesting.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Macro Deck and ManualTesting.dev)
Entertainment
100 100%
0% 0
Software Development Tools
Office & Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Software Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Macro Deck and ManualTesting.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Macro Deck should be more popular than ManualTesting.dev. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Macro Deck mentions (9)

  • Use Surface Pro 4 as Input Switcher
    I've looked at OBS Remote and macrodeck.org, deckboard.app, but these are all for changing scenes on the same device. I'd like something similar to a Crestron switch panel, but on my Surface Pro 4 instead. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Is making the switch from SLOBS to OBS a good idea?
    Also, if you do not have an Elgato Stream Deck, it has way more compatibility with Deckboard and MacroDeck (apps that let you use your phone as a Stream Deck). Source: about 3 years ago
  • Is it possible to use a laptop as a stream deck?
    You can use MacroDeck for that. Works over the network, you'd open it in the browser of your Laptop. Cheers! :). Source: about 3 years ago
  • Just finished my budget stream deck!
    If you'r ein the market for something fully free - as in: No cost and open source - I can also recommend https://macrodeck.org/. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Open source StreamDeck alternative
    I know there are some alternative solutions that works with smartphones such as touch-portal and macrodeck but they have some things that I don't like. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
View more

ManualTesting.dev mentions (1)

  • How I improved my confidence, code quality and became a better developer
    We built ManualTesting.dev, a simple and powerful tool, to help my team and people like me write code, test it, and deliver on time with confidence. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Macro Deck and ManualTesting.dev, you can also consider the following products

TouchPortal - Touch Portal is a companion app to control a PC or a Mac by using a deck of buttons to improve the workflow & productivity of game streamers, content creators and professionals.

Deckboard - Deckboard helps you create macros for Windows PC and launch them on your phone.

MATRIC - Control PC applications via smarthone/tablet. Especially suitable for space/flightsims.

UP Deck - UP Deck is a programmable control deck that you can use as a remote control for your multimedia platforms, including gaming, streaming, broadcasting, and much more.

Monect - Make the best use of sensors on smart device to control PC, simulate steering wheel, game-pad...

StreamPi - StreamPi is a robust remote control app alternative to StreamDeck.