
LyX
Overleaf
TeXstudio
Texmaker
TeXworks
Kile
TeXnicCenter
Microsoft Word
Codacy
SonarQube
CodeClimate
CodeFactor.io
ESLint
Coveralls
SensioLabs Insight
codebeat
Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request reporting back the impact of every commit or pull request, issues concerning code style, best practices, security, and many others. It monitors changes in code coverage, code duplication and code complexity. Saving developers time in code reviews thus efficiently tackling technical debt. JavaScript, Java, Ruby, Scala, PHP, Python, CoffeeScript and CSS are currently supported. Codacy is static analysis without the hassle.
CodacyLyX is highly recommended for researchers, scientists, and academicians who frequently produce complex documents such as theses, dissertations, research papers, and books. It is also suitable for anyone familiar with LaTeX who wants a more user-friendly interface or for those willing to learn it to produce high-quality typeset documents.
Based on our record, LyX should be more popular than Codacy. It has been mentiond 15 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
You can use LyX. LyX self-describes as a What You See is What You Mean editor, basically a fully graphical editor for writing LaTeX. Source: over 3 years ago
Directly typing LaTeX gets unwieldy for longer and more complicated expressions, so I write those in LyX first and then copy-and-paste the LaTeX code into Obsidian. Source: over 3 years ago
I like LyX. It's not for everyone, but damn it can be effective. Source: over 3 years ago
An upopular opinion perhaps, but I'm a huge fan of the WYSIWYM editor LyX. Source: almost 4 years ago
I don't think LyX devs will notice your point here, alas. You could consider writing an email to the devs email list found on lyx.org. Source: almost 4 years ago
I'm trying to use Codacy to review my code. One of the issues is regarding the use of the "setcookie" function. Source: over 4 years ago
Does anyone have an example on how to get this conversion done on github actions where I can convert the *.coverage file into a *.xml file for uploading to codacy.com. Source: about 5 years ago
Online analysisFinally, if you want a simple way to analyze your code without having to manually configure everything locally, you can use an online code review service such as Codacy (shameless plug here). We already integrate some of the mentioned detection tools in this article and we are working every day to improve the service. The other main benefit of using automated code review tools is to allow you to... - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
Because you care and because you always want to be better, automation is a great way to optimize your review workflow process. Go ahead and do a quick search on Google for automated code reviews and see who better fits your workflow. You'll find Codacy on your Google search and we hope you like what we do. - Source: dev.to / over 5 years ago
Overleaf - The online platform for scientific writing. Overleaf is free: start writing now with one click. No sign-up required. Great on your iPad.
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
TeXstudio - TeXstudio is an integrated environment for writing LaTeX documents.
CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.
Texmaker - Texmaker, free cross-platform latex editor
CodeFactor.io - Automated Code Review for GitHub & BitBucket