Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

ltrace VS ftrace

Compare ltrace VS ftrace and see what are their differences

ltrace logo ltrace

ltrace intercepts and records dynamic library calls which are called by an executed process and the...

ftrace logo ftrace

A function tracer for the Linux kernel.
  • ltrace Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-01
  • ftrace Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-03

ltrace features and specs

  • Function Call Tracing
    ltrace can intercept and record calls to dynamically linked library functions that are made by a program. This is useful for debugging and understanding program behavior.
  • Dynamic Library Tracking
    It focuses on tracing the use of library functions, which helps developers identify issues in the external libraries used by their applications.
  • Compatibility
    ltrace works on most Unix-like operating systems and supports a variety of application types, making it versatile for different environments.

Possible disadvantages of ltrace

  • Limited to Dynamic Libraries
    ltrace only traces dynamic library calls; it does not trace system calls or static library functions, limiting its scope in certain debugging scenarios.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running an application under ltrace can introduce performance overhead, which might affect the timing and behavior of the application being analyzed.
  • Complexity in Analysis
    The output of ltrace can be extensive and detailed, making it challenging to analyze and interpret without a good understanding of the program's libraries.

ftrace features and specs

  • Function Tracing
    ftrace provides a robust function tracing capability that allows developers to track function calls within the Linux kernel. This helps in identifying performance bottlenecks and debugging complex issues.
  • Dynamic Tracing
    It supports dynamic tracing, which means that trace points can be added or removed at runtime without needing to reboot or recompile the kernel, offering flexibility and reducing downtime.
  • Performance Analysis
    ftrace can be used for detailed performance analysis, helping to monitor system performance and resource usage, which is crucial for optimizing system behavior.
  • Lightweight
    ftrace is designed to be lightweight, ensuring minimal performance overhead on the system, which is an essential feature for maintaining system stability and performance during tracing.
  • Wide Adaptability
    It's widely adaptable across different architectures and is included in the Linux kernel, making it a versatile tool for Linux developers.

Possible disadvantages of ftrace

  • Complexity
    Setting up and using ftrace can be complex, especially for beginners, due to its extensive options and configurations which might require a steep learning curve.
  • Limited User-space Tracing
    ftrace primarily focuses on kernel space, which means its capabilities for tracing user-space applications are limited compared to some other tools.
  • Potential for Large Data Volume
    The tool can generate a large amount of trace data, which can be overwhelming to manage and analyze, requiring efficient data handling and filtering techniques.
  • Kernel Version Dependent
    Since ftrace features are closely tied to the kernel version, using the latest functionalities requires updating to the latest kernel, which may not always be feasible in production environments.
  • Security Concerns
    Enabling tracing can potentially expose sensitive information or alter the system's behavior, raising security concerns if not properly managed.

ltrace videos

How to Spy on Running Programs (strace, ltrace)

More videos:

  • Review - Sudo ltrace | Ryan's CTF [15] Strings wont help you

ftrace videos

No ftrace videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ltrace and ftrace)
OS & Utilities
48 48%
52% 52
IDE
48 48%
52% 52
Monitoring Tools
48 48%
52% 52
Software Development
45 45%
55% 55

User comments

Share your experience with using ltrace and ftrace. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ltrace and ftrace, you can also consider the following products

strace - Trace system calls and signals. A diagnostic, debugging and instructional userspace utility.

DTrace - DTrace is a performance analysis and troubleshooting tool for Solaris, Mac OS X and FreeBSD.

SystemTap - SystemTap provides instrumentation for a live running kernel and user-space applications.

perf - Perf is a simple app monitoring solution paired with meaningful alerts.

API Monitor - API Monitor is a software that monitors and displays API calls made by applications and services. Its a powerful tool for seeing how Windows and other applications work or tracking down problems that you have in your own applications

ktrace - Kernel process trace logging for the individual processes.