
Lovable
bolt.new
replit
BASE44
Cursor
WiX
Bubble.io
v0.dev
Boxes.dev
Codesphere
AppWizzy
InstaVM
Defang
Daytona
DigitalOcean
opencode
LovableNo Boxes.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, Lovable seems to be a lot more popular than Boxes.dev. While we know about 75 links to Lovable, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Boxes.dev. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
This is one of the strangest side effects of AI-assisted development becoming mainstream. Tools such as Lovable, v0, Bolt, Base44, Google AI Studio, Replit, and Claude can take a plain-language description and turn it into a working interface in minutes. But somewhere between typing your "build me a portfolio website" prompt and watching the interface come to life, a huge number of us end up with something that... - Source: dev.to / 1 day ago
Lovable takes a broader approach than a dedicated frontend generator. - Source: dev.to / 18 days ago
We built this in Lovable. A few prompts that saved real time:. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
I built the site, called Insider Hawk, with Lovable. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
A solo founder using Bolt or Lovable can go from idea to working prototype in a weekend. Cursor handles multi-file refactoring on a production codebase. V0 generates polished UI components from a description. The founder who previously needed six months and $80,000 in savings or seed funding can now ship a testable product in two weeks for under $8,000 in tool costs. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Devin Automations is the most obvious one: solid UX, but can get very expensive to run. There are also a bunch of newer startups in this space. I'm building one myself, https://boxes.dev -- we're very early but building for this exact use case. Some other ones worth a look are Factory Droid and Amp Orbs. Those two build their own agent harness (like Cursor), whereas with boxes.dev we run the native codex and... - Source: Hacker News / 1 day ago
These tools all assume you have machines to run the agents on. But for parallel agents I'm pretty convinced you want each agent on its own isolated devbox running your dev environment (not e.g. Worktrees on one box) - which isn't trivial to set up and manage. I'm working this with https://boxes.dev - a workspace for launching and managing claude + codex sessions, each running in its own cloud devbox. We launched... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
bolt.new - Prompt, run, edit, and deploy full-stack web apps
Codesphere - Deploy in less than 5s
replit - Code, create, andlearn together. Use our free, collaborative, in-browser IDE to code in 50+ languages โ without spending a second on setup.
AppWizzy - Build scalable web apps and websites with AI that serve you for years. Professional vibe-coding platform. Perfect to build SaaS, intenal tool, AI tool, business app, etc
BASE44 - The platform for people to turn ideas into working products.
InstaVM - Instant computers for AI agents