Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
OSM

LOGBack VS Open Source @ Microsoft

Compare LOGBack VS Open Source @ Microsoft and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

LOGBack logo LOGBack

Logging framework

Open Source @ Microsoft logo Open Source @ Microsoft

Microsoft's Open Source projects on Github
  • LOGBack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-17
  • Open Source @ Microsoft Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-02

LOGBack features and specs

  • Performance
    LOGBack is designed to be performant with efficient computation and low memory footprint, making it suitable for high-load applications.
  • Configuration
    It offers a flexible and powerful configuration via XML or Groovy, allowing detailed customization for logging behavior.
  • Integration
    Seamless integration with SLF4J provides a standard API for various logging frameworks, simplifying the logging implementation.
  • Rolling Policies
    Includes advanced rolling policies for log files, including time-based and size-based rotation, ensuring log management is efficient and organized.
  • Community Support
    Active community support and comprehensive documentation make it easier for developers to troubleshoot and enhance their implementation.

Possible disadvantages of LOGBack

  • Complexity
    The configuration complexity may be overwhelming for beginners who need only basic logging functionalities.
  • Dependency
    Adding LOGBack to a project increases the number of dependencies, which can affect project size and complexity management.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers unfamiliar with SLF4J or complex logging requirements, there might be a steep learning curve.
  • Legacy Systems
    Integration with older systems that rely on legacy logging frameworks might require additional adjustments or code refactoring.

Open Source @ Microsoft features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LOGBack and Open Source @ Microsoft)

LOGBack

Open Source @ Microsoft

Monitoring Tools
100 100%
Monitoring Tools
0% 0
Open Source
0 0%
Open Source
100% 100
Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0
Web App
0 0%
Web App
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using LOGBack and Open Source @ Microsoft. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LOGBack and Open Source @ Microsoft, you can also consider the following products

Logmatic - Logmatic is a log centralization, analytics & visualization platform to improve software & business performance.

Code NASA - 253 NASA open source software projects

AWS CloudTrail - AWS CloudTrail is a web service that records AWS API calls for your account and delivers log files to you.

Open Source @IFTTT - A collection of IFTTT OSS projects.

Serilog - Backend Development and Utilities

Google Open Source - All of Googles open source projects under a single umbrella

Loading...