Regularly review your cluster's utilization to check whether it's still suitable for your workloads. Test autoscaling rules by using a load-testing tool like Locust to direct excess traffic to your cluster. This lets you spot problems earlier, ensuring your Pods will scale seamlessly when real traffic arrives. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago

Locust: While primarily a load testing tool, it can be used to simulate user behavior under stress. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago

But you don’t have to operate at Netflix’s scale to benefit from the same mindset. Effective teams simulate log floods during load tests, which push traffic through staging environments while tracking how ingestion, indexing, and alerting respond to the increased load. Tools like Grafana’s k6 and Locust can simulate thousands of requests per second, while synthetic log generators mimic bursty error scenarios. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

I mean honestly - the "classic" Apache model of throwing things into the www root is very strong for rapid development. Hot code reloading is sometimes finicky, you can end up with unexpected hidden state and lose sanity over a stupid heisenbug. Trust me. IMO you don't need to compensate for bad configs if you're using a proper staging environment and push-button deployments (which is good practice regardless of... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

Use load testing tools like JMeter, Gatling, or Locust to simulate demand spikes and verify that your auto-scaling rules work as expected. This will ensure that your system can handle real-world traffic patterns. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Even Strapi needs to be hosted somewhere, and that usually involves a recurring fee. I've had great success over the past 2 years building blogs using http://webiny.com, and because they get low traffic, I've only ever had 1 bill from AWS that was around 80 cents US. Source: about 4 years ago

Strapi is awesome, I've been a fan of the project since its early days. However, I've been closely watching Webiny too. It's easier to host because you don't have to worry about running Docker containers or installing MongoDB on your local machine. Instead you put it on your AWS account (can be done with a few clicks), define your content models once it's there and you then only pay for usage. http://webiny.com. Source: over 4 years ago

Yeah I hear you, SAAS CMS platforms can get prohibitively expensive really quickly after the initial free tier expires. I've found hosting Strapi (or similar) on Heroku has saved me the cost of keeping a server instance running, which usually would cost $5-10 per month. However, the most cost effective for me so far has been Webiny. It's serverless so you install it on AWS and typically don't pay as much (if... Source: over 4 years ago

Otherwise if you want a framework to build on, there's Redwood (which works particularly well on Netlify and Vercel) or Webiny (for AWS, Azure and others). - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago