Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

locust VS Does.qa

Compare locust VS Does.qa and see what are their differences

Tabidoo
A simple way to keep all your data under control. Build your own business applications in just 4 minutes. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

locust logo locust

An open source load testing tool written in Python.

Does.qa logo Does.qa

DoesQA is a no-code solution which unlocks the power of automation testing for everyone in every project.
  • locust Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-11
  • Does.qa
    Image date //
    2024-07-09

DoesQA is Codeless test automation that's more powerful than code! Any team member can create complex automation tests easily, enabling QA to keep pace with development and build coverage while reducing costs.

DoesQA doesn't just make the easy stuff easier; our codeless test automation tool also supports API integrations, Visual Regression, Pa11y, Lighthouse, and many more.

You'll be able to create tests in minutes which would have taken months in code.

locust

Website
locust.io
Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

Does.qa

Website
does.qa
Pricing URL
Official Does.qa Pricing
$ Details
paid Free Trial $95.0 / Monthly (Unlimited Testing, Unlimited Users, 10 Parallel Runners)
Platforms
Google Chrome Firefox Edge
Release Date
2023 March
Edit details

locust features and specs

  • Scalability
    Locust is designed to distribute the load tests across multiple machines, allowing for high scalability and the ability to simulate millions of users.
  • Python-based
    The tool is written in Python, which makes it highly flexible and suitable for those who are familiar with the language. You can write custom test scenarios easily.
  • Web-based UI
    Locust provides a user-friendly web-based interface that makes it easy to monitor and control the test execution in real-time.
  • Real-time monitoring
    During test execution, you get real-time statistics and charts that help in monitoring the performance and load.
  • Open-source
    Being an open-source tool, Locust allows for community contributions and is free to use, which helps in continuous improvement and support from the user base.

Possible disadvantages of locust

  • Setup Complexity
    Initial setup can be somewhat complex, especially for large scale or distributed tests. Requires experience with Python and potentially other infrastructure setups.
  • Resource Intensive
    Locust can be resource-intensive, requiring significant compute resources, particularly when simulating large numbers of users.
  • Steeper Learning Curve
    Despite its flexibility, the requirement to write test scenarios in Python may present a learning curve for users not familiar with programming.
  • Limited Protocol Support
    Primarily designed for HTTP/HTTPS protocols, Locust might not be suitable for load testing applications that use other protocols without additional customization.
  • Dependence on External Libraries
    While the use of Python offers flexibility, it also means that you might need to rely on external libraries and tools, which can introduce dependency management issues.

Does.qa features and specs

  • Unlimited Concurrency
  • Multi-browser
  • Drag-and-drop UI
  • Lighthouse
  • Visual Regression
  • Pa11y
  • API
  • Slack Integration
  • CI/CD
  • Scheduling
  • Email Testing
  • Generate Authentic MFA Tokens

Analysis of locust

Overall verdict

  • Locust is a powerful and flexible tool for load testing, particularly advantageous for teams familiar with Python. Its scalability and ease of setup make it a strong choice for both small and large projects.

Why this product is good

  • Locust (locust.io) is considered a good tool for load testing due to its easy-to-use, scalable, and distributed nature. Written in Python, it allows developers to write simple or complex test scenarios in the same language. It enables the simulation of millions of users by distributing tasks across multiple machines, making it highly valuable for performance testing of websites and applications. The web-based user interface is another advantage, allowing real-time monitoring of test progress and results.

Recommended for

  • Development teams looking for a scalable load testing tool.
  • Organizations that prefer open-source solutions.
  • Projects requiring custom test scenarios in Python.
  • Teams needing real-time monitoring and distributed testing capabilities.

locust videos

+ Add

Locust review - GTA Online guides

More videos:

  • Review - GTA Online: Ocelot Locust Review
  • Review - GTA 5 - DLC Vehicle Customization - Ocelot Locust and Review

Does.qa videos

+ Add

Introduction to DoesQA

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to locust and Does.qa)

locust

Does.qa

Monitoring Tools
100 100%
Monitoring Tools
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
Automated Testing
100% 100
Website Testing
70 70%
Website Testing
30% 30
Testing
0 0%
Testing
100% 100

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing locust and Does.qa.

What makes your product unique?

Does.qa's answer:

DoesQA simplifies test creation and improves reliability while keeping the tester in control. With unlimited concurrency as standard there's no faster way to create or run your tests.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Does.qa's answer:

DoesQA is the only solution which supports branching tests, API requests and Lighthouse Audits. DoesQA was built by experienced SDETs to make testing simpler, faster and more cost-effective while allowing all the power which comes with a traditional code-based solution.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Does.qa's answer:

Engineering teams who want powerful web end-to-end automation tests without the costs typically associated with building a test framework and running tests remotely.

What's the story behind your product?

Does.qa's answer:

Everyone's endlessly wasting money building their own test framework.

User comments

Share your experience with using locust and Does.qa. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, locust seems to be a lot more popular than Does.qa. While we know about 65 links to locust, we've tracked only 1 mention of Does.qa. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

locust mentions (65)

  • 15 Common Kubernetes Pitfalls & Challenges
    Regularly review your cluster's utilization to check whether it's still suitable for your workloads. Test autoscaling rules by using a load-testing tool like Locust to direct excess traffic to your cluster. This lets you spot problems earlier, ensuring your Pods will scale seamlessly when real traffic arrives. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Small-Scale Chaos Testing: The Missing Step Before Production
    Locust: While primarily a load testing tool, it can be used to simulate user behavior under stress. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Log Spikes? Noย Sweat: How Top DevOps Teams Tame Bursty Workloads
    But you donโ€™t have to operate at Netflixโ€™s scale to benefit from the same mindset. Effective teams simulate log floods during load tests, which push traffic through staging environments while tracking how ingestion, indexing, and alerting respond to the increased load. Tools like Grafanaโ€™s k6 and Locust can simulate thousands of requests per second, while synthetic log generators mimic bursty error scenarios. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Serving 200M requests per day with a CGI-bin
    I mean honestly - the "classic" Apache model of throwing things into the www root is very strong for rapid development. Hot code reloading is sometimes finicky, you can end up with unexpected hidden state and lose sanity over a stupid heisenbug. Trust me. IMO you don't need to compensate for bad configs if you're using a proper staging environment and push-button deployments (which is good practice regardless of... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • 3 Types of Chaos Experiments and How To Run Them
    Use load testing tools like JMeter, Gatling, or Locust to simulate demand spikes and verify that your auto-scaling rules work as expected. This will ensure that your system can handle real-world traffic patterns. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

Does.qa mentions (1)

  • Automation Tool that can handle BOTH Web and Mobile App testing
    Hey, DoesQA here, we have a compatible set of steps as WebdriverIO but as a codeless test automation tool. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing locust and Does.qa, you can also consider the following products

Apache JMeter - Apache JMeterโ„ข.

DogQ.io - No-code tests in cloud for web developers with all skill levels

Loader.io - Loader.io is a simple cloud-based load testing service

Testpine - No Code Test Automation for Web & Mobile and Test Management

AT Internet - Transform your data into action with our powerful and flexible digital analytics solution.

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

Loading...