
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, LocalSend seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 24 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | localsend.org | shadowgit.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from Germany · 1 - 9 employees · 2025 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of LocalSend yet.
Every change saved. Any version restorable. AI can search what changed to debug faster. Never lose work again. Cut debugging time by 80%. Save 50% on AI tokens. 100% local.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Localsend: An Open Source Airdrop Alternative
More videos
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing LocalSend and ShadowGit.
ShadowGit's answer:
ShadowGit is the only tool where AI assistants can directly search your code history to debug faster while using 50% fewer tokens. Auto-captures every change without touching your main git repo. Built specifically for AI-assisted development.
ShadowGit's answer:
Electron is the primary technology being used.
ShadowGit's answer:
ShadowGit is the only tool built specifically for developers using AI. Unlike generic backup tools, your AI can actually search the history to debug faster and use 50% fewer tokens. Separate shadow repo means your main git stays clean. 100% local.
ShadowGit's answer:
AI-Accelerated solo developers that use AI coding assistants daily (Claude, Cursor, Copilot), experienced enough to feel the pain (2-10 years of coding) and that want to move fast, ship often and experiment constantly.
ShadowGit's answer:
I built ShadowGit after losing 3 hours of work to a bad AI refactor. Started as a personal backup tool, but when I added MCP integration so AI could search the history, debugging time dropped 80%. Had to share it.
Share your experience with using LocalSend and ShadowGit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


IPv6 doesn't solve the Airdrop problem. It'll only work at reasonably-fast speeds in the rare case that both people are connected to the same wifi network - but there's already tools like LocalSend[0] for that. Having a file go via... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Did you try loading the browser as a non-game application? To be honest, I primarily do my browsing offline, and I installed https://localsend.org using Flatpak to move files to/from the Steam Deck. It works amazingly well. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
Shoutout to https://localsend.org/ - it can even open a local webserver if needed. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
Tracking ShadowGit since Sep 2025.
When comparing LocalSend and ShadowGit, you can also consider the following products.

Local file sharing in your browser. Inspired by Apple's AirDrop. Fork of Snapdrop.
Compare PairDrop to LocalSend or ShadowGit:

Git is a free and open source version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. It is easy to learn and lightweight with lighting fast performance that outclasses competitors.
Compare Git to LocalSend or ShadowGit:

An open source alternative to Alternative to AirDrop.
Compare Snapdrop to LocalSend or ShadowGit:

Wormhole lets you share files with end-to-end encryption and a link that automatically expires.
Compare Wormhole.app to LocalSend or ShadowGit:

HTML5 clone of Apple's AirDrop - easy P2P file transfer powered by WebRTC
Compare ShareDrop to LocalSend or ShadowGit:

Syncthing replaces proprietary sync and cloud services with something open, trustworthy and...
Compare Syncthing to LocalSend or ShadowGit: