Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

localhost.run VS ShellHub

Compare localhost.run VS ShellHub and see what are their differences

localhost.run logo localhost.run

Instantly share your localhost environment!

ShellHub logo ShellHub

ShellHub enables teams to easily access any Linux device behind firewall and NAT
  • localhost.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24
  • ShellHub Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-02

localhost.run features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Localhost.run provides a simple way to expose your local server to the internet without requiring complex configurations or additional software installations.
  • No Installation Required
    You can use localhost.run directly from your terminal without the need to install any software or dependencies.
  • Free and Instantaneous
    Localhost.run offers a free service, and you can quickly start tunneling without any wait times or sign-ups.
  • Wide Compatibility
    It works with any web server running on your local machine, making it highly versatile.

Possible disadvantages of localhost.run

  • Stability and Uptime
    As a free service, localhost.run may not be as reliable as paid alternatives, potentially leading to unexpected downtimes.
  • Limited Customization
    Localhost.run doesn't offer many advanced features or customizations, which may be a drawback for more complex use cases.
  • Security
    By exposing your local server to the internet, there could be potential security risks if your server is not properly configured or secured.
  • Performance
    The performance of the tunnel can be slower compared to running the server locally due to additional network hops and bandwidth limitations.

ShellHub features and specs

  • Centralized Management
    ShellHub offers centralized management for all your SSH devices, making it easier to manage multiple devices from a single interface.
  • Access Control
    With ShellHub, administrators can set up role-based access control, allowing for granular permissions and improved security over who can access which devices.
  • Web-based Terminal
    ShellHub provides a web-based terminal that allows users to access SSH devices through a browser, eliminating the need for a local SSH client.
  • Cloud and On-premises Deployment
    Users have the flexibility to deploy ShellHub in the cloud or on-premises, which can be tailored to their specific infrastructure needs and compliance requirements.
  • Audit Logging
    ShellHub includes audit logging features that help in tracking and monitoring user activity for better compliance and auditing purposes.

Possible disadvantages of ShellHub

  • Complexity for Small Networks
    For smaller networks or fewer devices, ShellHub might be overkill and introduce unnecessary complexity compared to simpler SSH management solutions.
  • Resource Intensive
    Deploying and running ShellHub can be resource-intensive, requiring sufficient hardware and potentially leading to higher operational costs.
  • Learning Curve
    Users may encounter a learning curve when initially setting up and configuring ShellHub, especially if they are new to centralized device management systems.
  • Dependency on Web Interface
    Relying on the web-based interface may be a disadvantage in environments where network reliability is an issue or where minimalist solutions are preferred.
  • Potential Security Risks
    As with any centralized management system, there is a potential risk that a compromised ShellHub deployment could lead to broader access issues across managed devices.

Analysis of localhost.run

Overall verdict

  • Localhost.run is a good tool for developers who need a fast, efficient, and secure way to share their local development environments. Its ease of use and minimal setup make it an excellent choice for quick sharing and testing scenarios.

Why this product is good

  • Localhost.run is a service that provides a quick and easy way to expose a local server to the internet. It is often praised for its simplicity, ease of use, and minimal setup requirements. It allows developers to share their work quickly for collaboration, testing, or demonstration purposes without needing to deploy to a public server. It uses a secure SSH tunnel, which adds a layer of security to the service.

Recommended for

  • Developers who need to demo their work to clients or teams
  • Collaborative programming and real-time feedback
  • Testing webhooks or APIs from an external source
  • Temporary exposure of local servers for testing purposes

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to localhost.run and ShellHub)
Localhost Tools
88 88%
12% 12
Testing
86 86%
14% 14
Webhooks
87 87%
13% 13
Tunnel
82 82%
18% 18

User comments

Share your experience with using localhost.run and ShellHub. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare localhost.run and ShellHub

localhost.run Reviews

Tunnelling services for exposing localhost to the web
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Source: chenhuijing.com

ShellHub Reviews

We have no reviews of ShellHub yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, localhost.run seems to be a lot more popular than ShellHub. While we know about 42 links to localhost.run, we've tracked only 1 mention of ShellHub. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

localhost.run mentions (42)

View more

ShellHub mentions (1)

  • Tutorial: How to access Raspberry Pi remotely from anywhere
    And we finished. Now You can access your RPI in an easy, fast, and safe way. If you have any doubts, feel free to check our documentation or contact us at contact@shellhub.io. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing localhost.run and ShellHub, you can also consider the following products

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

sish - An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.

LocalXpose - Your network without the IT work. Radically simple, always-on tunneling service for mission-critical applications.

Staqlab Tunnel - Expose server running on your localhost to internet and get a public domain which would work everywhere

Portmap.io - Expose your local PC to Internet from behind firewall and without real IP address

Packetriot - Serve Apps, Connect Software, Access Devices.