Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

localhost.run VS Microsoft Cloud App Security

Compare localhost.run VS Microsoft Cloud App Security and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

localhost.run logo localhost.run

Instantly share your localhost environment!

Microsoft Cloud App Security logo Microsoft Cloud App Security

Microsoft Cloud App Security provides deeper visibility, comprehensive controls, and enhanced protection against cloud security issues.
  • localhost.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24
  • Microsoft Cloud App Security Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-03

localhost.run features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Localhost.run provides a simple way to expose your local server to the internet without requiring complex configurations or additional software installations.
  • No Installation Required
    You can use localhost.run directly from your terminal without the need to install any software or dependencies.
  • Free and Instantaneous
    Localhost.run offers a free service, and you can quickly start tunneling without any wait times or sign-ups.
  • Wide Compatibility
    It works with any web server running on your local machine, making it highly versatile.

Possible disadvantages of localhost.run

  • Stability and Uptime
    As a free service, localhost.run may not be as reliable as paid alternatives, potentially leading to unexpected downtimes.
  • Limited Customization
    Localhost.run doesn't offer many advanced features or customizations, which may be a drawback for more complex use cases.
  • Security
    By exposing your local server to the internet, there could be potential security risks if your server is not properly configured or secured.
  • Performance
    The performance of the tunnel can be slower compared to running the server locally due to additional network hops and bandwidth limitations.

Microsoft Cloud App Security features and specs

  • Comprehensive Visibility
    Microsoft Cloud App Security provides extensive visibility into cloud app usage, enabling organizations to discover and control the use of shadow IT within their environment. This visibility helps in identifying risky activities and ensuring compliance with security policies.
  • Advanced Threat Protection
    The platform offers advanced threat detection capabilities, utilizing real-time analytics and machine learning to identify suspicious behavior across cloud applications. This proactive approach enhances an organization's overall security posture by swiftly detecting and mitigating potential threats.
  • Seamless Integration
    Microsoft Cloud App Security integrates smoothly with other Microsoft products such as Azure Active Directory, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Microsoft 365, offering a unified security management experience and reducing the complexity of managing multiple security solutions.
  • Automated Policy Enforcement
    Organizations can leverage pre-built and custom policies to enforce compliance and security measures automatically. This feature helps streamline security operations by minimizing the need for manual interventions and ensuring that security protocols are consistently applied.
  • Data Protection
    The solution includes robust data protection features such as data loss prevention (DLP), information protection, and encryption, which help safeguard sensitive information across cloud applications and prevent data breaches.

Possible disadvantages of Microsoft Cloud App Security

  • Complex Deployment
    Due to its extensive features and capabilities, setting up Microsoft Cloud App Security can be complex, requiring expertise and potentially substantial time investment to tailor it to an organization's specific needs.
  • Cost Consideration
    For small to medium-sized businesses, the cost of implementing and maintaining Microsoft Cloud App Security could be a concern, as it requires licensing fees. Budget constraints might limit access to its full capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    The platform's wide range of features and integration capabilities might result in a steep learning curve for security teams. Adequate training and resources are necessary to effectively utilize the platform's full potential.
  • Dependency on Microsoft Ecosystem
    Organizations heavily invested in non-Microsoft ecosystems might find the integration capabilities less seamless compared to those within the Microsoft environment, potentially limiting the effectiveness of the solution when managing third-party applications.
  • Potential False Positives
    As with many advanced security solutions, there may be occurrences of false positives in threat alerts, which could lead to alert fatigue among security teams and the risk of critical threats being overlooked.

Analysis of localhost.run

Overall verdict

  • Localhost.run is a good tool for developers who need a fast, efficient, and secure way to share their local development environments. Its ease of use and minimal setup make it an excellent choice for quick sharing and testing scenarios.

Why this product is good

  • Localhost.run is a service that provides a quick and easy way to expose a local server to the internet. It is often praised for its simplicity, ease of use, and minimal setup requirements. It allows developers to share their work quickly for collaboration, testing, or demonstration purposes without needing to deploy to a public server. It uses a secure SSH tunnel, which adds a layer of security to the service.

Recommended for

  • Developers who need to demo their work to clients or teams
  • Collaborative programming and real-time feedback
  • Testing webhooks or APIs from an external source
  • Temporary exposure of local servers for testing purposes

localhost.run videos

No localhost.run videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Microsoft Cloud App Security videos

+ Add

Overview: Microsoft Cloud App Security (CASB)

More videos:

  • Review - Microsoft Cloud App Security: Overview
  • Review - Investigate Shadow IT with Microsoft Cloud App Security

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to localhost.run and Microsoft Cloud App Security)

localhost.run

Microsoft Cloud App Security

Localhost Tools
100 100%
Localhost Tools
0% 0
Identity And Access Management
0 0%
Identity And Access Management
100% 100
Webhooks
100 100%
Webhooks
0% 0
Security & Privacy
0 0%
Security & Privacy
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using localhost.run and Microsoft Cloud App Security. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare localhost.run and Microsoft Cloud App Security

localhost.run Reviews

Tunnelling services for exposing localhost to the web
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Source: chenhuijing.com

Microsoft Cloud App Security Reviews

We have no reviews of Microsoft Cloud App Security yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, localhost.run seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 42 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

localhost.run mentions (42)

View more

Microsoft Cloud App Security mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Microsoft Cloud App Security yet. Tracking of Microsoft Cloud App Security recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing localhost.run and Microsoft Cloud App Security, you can also consider the following products

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

Duo Security - Duo Security provides cloud-based two-factor authentication. Duoโ€™s technology can be deployed to protect users, data, and applications from breaches, credential theft, and account takeover.

LocalXpose - Your network without the IT work. Radically simple, always-on tunneling service for mission-critical applications.

Trend Micro Cloud App Security - Trend Micro Cloud App Security delivers advanced threat and data protection for Office 365 and cloud file-sharing services.

sish - An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.

Perimeter 81 - Simplify secure network, cloud and application access. Perimeter 81โ€™s zero trust Secure Network as a Service and Software-Defined Perimeter technology provide the simplest and highest level of security, for companies of all sizes.

Loading...