Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

localhost.run VS Code42

Compare localhost.run VS Code42 and see what are their differences

NinjaOne
NinjaOne (Formerly NinjaRMM) provides remote monitoring and management software that combines powerful functionality with a fast, modern UI. Easily remediate IT issues, automate common tasks, and support end-users with powerful IT management tools. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

localhost.run logo localhost.run

Instantly share your localhost environment!

Code42 logo Code42

Code42 is a SaaS solution for enterprises that secures all user data on one secure platform, leaving you and your business secure in the knowledge that both your employee's and customer's data is protected. Read more about Code42.
  • localhost.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24
  • Code42 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-12

localhost.run

Website
localhost.run
Pricing URL
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

Code42

Website
code42.com
Pricing URL
Official Code42 Pricing
Release Date
2001 January
Startup details
Country
United States
State
Minnesota
City
Minneapolis
Founder(s)
Brian Bispala
Employees
500 - 999
Edit details

localhost.run features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Localhost.run provides a simple way to expose your local server to the internet without requiring complex configurations or additional software installations.
  • No Installation Required
    You can use localhost.run directly from your terminal without the need to install any software or dependencies.
  • Free and Instantaneous
    Localhost.run offers a free service, and you can quickly start tunneling without any wait times or sign-ups.
  • Wide Compatibility
    It works with any web server running on your local machine, making it highly versatile.

Possible disadvantages of localhost.run

  • Stability and Uptime
    As a free service, localhost.run may not be as reliable as paid alternatives, potentially leading to unexpected downtimes.
  • Limited Customization
    Localhost.run doesn't offer many advanced features or customizations, which may be a drawback for more complex use cases.
  • Security
    By exposing your local server to the internet, there could be potential security risks if your server is not properly configured or secured.
  • Performance
    The performance of the tunnel can be slower compared to running the server locally due to additional network hops and bandwidth limitations.

Code42 features and specs

  • Comprehensive Data Protection
    Code42 offers extensive data backup and recovery solutions, ensuring that user data is protected against loss or accidental deletion.
  • Real-Time Backup
    The platform provides real-time and continuous backups, minimizing data loss by ensuring the latest data is always protected.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Code42 supports multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, offering flexibility for diverse IT environments.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The software features an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible even for users with limited technical knowledge.
  • Strong Security Measures
    Code42 implements robust encryption both in transit and at rest, ensuring that user data remains secure and confidential.
  • Scalability
    The platform is designed to scale with business growth, from small businesses to large enterprises, providing tailored solutions as needs evolve.
  • Centralized Management
    Administrators can manage and monitor all backups from a central dashboard, simplifying oversight and ensuring compliance with company policies.

Possible disadvantages of Code42

  • Cost
    Code42 can be expensive, especially for small businesses or startups that may have limited IT budgets.
  • Bandwidth Consumption
    Real-time backups can sometimes use significant bandwidth, potentially affecting other network activities if not managed properly.
  • Resource Intensive
    The software can be resource-intensive, potentially slowing down older or less powerful systems during backup operations.
  • Complexity in Large Deployments
    While scalable, large enterprise deployments may require significant time and expertise to set up and manage effectively.
  • Limited Mobile Support
    Currently, Code42 offers limited functionality on mobile devices compared to its desktop application.

Analysis of localhost.run

Overall verdict

  • Localhost.run is a good tool for developers who need a fast, efficient, and secure way to share their local development environments. Its ease of use and minimal setup make it an excellent choice for quick sharing and testing scenarios.

Why this product is good

  • Localhost.run is a service that provides a quick and easy way to expose a local server to the internet. It is often praised for its simplicity, ease of use, and minimal setup requirements. It allows developers to share their work quickly for collaboration, testing, or demonstration purposes without needing to deploy to a public server. It uses a secure SSH tunnel, which adds a layer of security to the service.

Recommended for

  • Developers who need to demo their work to clients or teams
  • Collaborative programming and real-time feedback
  • Testing webhooks or APIs from an external source
  • Temporary exposure of local servers for testing purposes

localhost.run videos

No localhost.run videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Code42 videos

+ Add

Introducing Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection

More videos:

  • Review - MACOM Protects IP from Insider Threats with Code42 and Splunk
  • Review - You asked. We answered with Code42 CrashPlan 5.0

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to localhost.run and Code42)

localhost.run

Code42

Localhost Tools
100 100%
Localhost Tools
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
Monitoring Tools
100% 100
Webhooks
100 100%
Webhooks
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
Cloud Storage
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using localhost.run and Code42. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare localhost.run and Code42

localhost.run Reviews

Tunnelling services for exposing localhost to the web
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Source: chenhuijing.com

Code42 Reviews

Best Nessus Alternatives (Free and Paid) for 2021
Code42โ€™s Threat and Vulnerability Management software monitors for vulnerabilities on an on-going basis. It also conducts monthly internal as well as external vulnerability scans using industry-recognized top-notch vulnerability scanning tools. Identified vulnerabilities are evaluated, documented, and remediated to avoid any potential risk of the data breach.
Source: www.softwaretestingmaterial.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, localhost.run seems to be a lot more popular than Code42. While we know about 42 links to localhost.run, we've tracked only 1 mention of Code42. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

localhost.run mentions (42)

View more

Code42 mentions (1)

  • Looking for the best cloud backup for all my files
    It's not a big surprise, given that Code42 (the parent company) pretends they have nothing to do with Crashplan. They've done a massive pivot to some kind of security company, with ZERO references to the OG product of Crashplan on code42.com, which (I'm guessing) is the bulk of their revenue. If you do a site search on google, you'll find some old links, but they just push you over to crashplan.com. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing localhost.run and Code42, you can also consider the following products

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

Symantec Data Loss Prevention - Fully protect your data with the comprehensive detection technologies and unified policies of Symantec's industry leading Data Loss Prevention (DLP).

sish - An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.

Microsoft BitLocker - BitLocker is a full disk encryption feature included with Windows Vista and later.

LocalXpose - Your network without the IT work. Radically simple, always-on tunneling service for mission-critical applications.

Paubox - Paubox provides HIPAA compliant email encryption without the hassle of extra steps.

Loading...