Software Alternatives & Startups

Lobby Code VS Heatpoints

Compare Lobby Code VS Heatpoints and see what are their differences

Lobby Code

Optimize coding productivity with the world’s best assistant

Rating
0 reviews
Heatpoints

See what users see before they do. Upload any interface or enter a URL to generate an AI-powered visual attention heatmap in seconds.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium €29 / Monthly
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

LC
Lobby Code
Heatpoints
Website code.lobby.so heatpoints.com
Pricing —
Freemium €29 / Monthly Official pricing
Company — Startup from France · 1 - 9 employees · 2026
Listed in

About Lobby Code and Heatpoints

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

LC
Lobby Code
Heatpoints

No description of Lobby Code yet.

AI attention heatmap tool built on peer-reviewed eye-tracking research. Paste a URL or upload a design and get a predictive heatmap, an attention score /100 and an AI-written audit in 30 seconds — before your page has any traffic. No tracking script, no cookies, no consent banner. Free plan with...

Read more about Heatpoints

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

LC
Lobby Code 4 features
Heatpoints 12 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Lobby Code offers a simple and intuitive user interface that makes it easy for users to navigate and utilize its features without a steep learning curve.
  • Efficient Collaboration
    The platform is designed to enhance collaboration among team members through features like real-time editing and communication tools.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Lobby Code supports integration with various third-party services and tools, allowing users to streamline their workflows and improve productivity.
  • Customizable Workspaces
    Users can customize their workspaces to better suit their project needs, enhancing flexibility and personalization of the working environment.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Offline Access
    The platform has limited functionality when used offline, requiring an internet connection for most of its features to work effectively.
  • Pricing
    Some users may find the pricing model of Lobby Code to be less competitive compared to other alternatives in the market, especially for smaller teams or individual users.
  • Integration Complexity
    While Lobby Code offers integration options, setting them up can sometimes be complex and may require technical expertise or support.
  • Feature Overload
    Some users might feel overwhelmed by the sheer number of features and options available, potentially complicating the user experience for those who prefer simpler tools.
  • Attention Score
    The free scanner: paste a URL, get a score out of 100 and a blurred heatmap in seconds. No account needed.
  • Scan Designs & mockups
    Drop a JPG or PNG — a Lovable export, a Figma frame, a client's V1 — and score it before a single line of code ships. Same model, same metrics as a live URL.
  • LiveHeat
    Not a screenshot tool: LiveHeat runs the model on your page as you use it. Four modes, one canvas — each answers a different question.
  • Regions
    Draw any zone on the page — a CTA, a banner, a face — and get the exact share of predicted attention it captures. Select several zones and compare them: the A/B argument in one number.
  • Scrollcast
    LiveHeat records a full scroll of your page and renders it as a saliency video: attention flowing, section after section. Export it, drop it in a client deck — it's the before/after nobody argues with.
  • Scrub
    Flip Scrub on and the page scroll becomes the video timeline: you walk the attention story frame by frame, at exactly the position your visitor would be. The most natural way to review a long page.
  • Words Map
    Every text block is scored twice: what it says, and whether the eye actually reads it. Not per paragraph — per word, with a 0→1 reading-attention score on each token and a verdict on each sentence.
  • Multi-device audit
    Desktop, tablet and mobile captured section by section — each screen scored on attention, focus, coverage and hierarchy.
  • Report Studio
    Executive summary, per-section notes, cross-device findings and priority actions — written by GLM-5.2 from your real metrics. Generated server-side: close the tab, the finished report waits in your dashboard.
  • Pulse
    A cookieless snippet measures how real visitors actually behave — scroll reach, dwell, rage clicks — and confronts the prediction with reality. No banner needed.
  • Badges
    Every scan ships a live badge for your README or footer, and pages scoring 80+ earn the Certified label — rare on purpose, verifiable by anyone.
  • Figma plugin
    Select a frame and the attention heatmap lands on your canvas as a layer, with 4 scores (attention, focus, coverage, hierarchy). Catch hierarchy problems in design review — before dev builds anything. Pending Figma Community review.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

LC
Lobby Code
Heatpoints

Overall verdict

  • Lobby Code is a solid choice for teams and individuals looking for a modern, AI-assisted coding and collaboration platform, offering a good balance of usability, integrations, and productivity features, though it may not yet match the depth of more established enterprise tools.

Why this product is good

  • Streamlined, intuitive interface for collaborative coding
  • AI-assisted features that speed up development and debugging
  • Good integration options with popular developer tools and workflows
  • Responsive and modern design suited for remote teams
  • Regular updates suggesting active development and support

Recommended for

  • Small to medium-sized development teams
  • Startups looking for collaborative coding tools
  • Developers who want AI-assisted coding support
  • Remote teams needing real-time collaboration features
  • Individuals exploring modern alternatives to traditional IDLEs or code-sharing platforms

Overall verdict

  • Heatpoints appears to be a niche analytics/heatmap tool, but I don't have verified, up-to-date information confirming its current features, pricing, or reliability, so I can't give a confident endorsement without you checking recent reviews and testing it yourself.

Why this product is good

  • Heatmap and user-behavior tracking tools like this can offer useful visual insights into how visitors interact with a website
  • May provide affordable alternatives to larger analytics platforms
  • Could integrate simple tracking snippets for quick setup on websites
  • Some tools in this category offer session recordings alongside heatmaps for deeper UX analysis

Recommended for

  • Small business owners wanting basic visual insights into site visitor behavior
  • Website designers looking to identify UI friction points
  • Marketers testing landing page effectiveness
  • Users seeking a budget-friendly alternative to premium heatmap tools like Hotjar or Crazy Egg

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
LC
Lobby Code
Heatpoints
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Lobby Code and Heatpoints.

What makes your product unique?

Heatpoints's answer:

Heatpoints predicts where visitors will look — and which words they will actually read — before a page is live, with no tracking script, no cookie and no consent banner. It runs a peer-reviewed eye-tracking AI on any URL, mockup or screenshot and returns a heatmap, an attention score out of 100 and an AI-written audit in about 30 seconds. Its Words Map (word-by-word reading attention) and its cookieless prediction-vs-reality check (Pulse) are things no other commercial tool offers.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Heatpoints's answer:

Session-recording and real-user heatmap tools (Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Plerdy) need a live site, traffic and a consent banner — they can only tell you what already happened. Heatpoints answers the question before you have any traffic: what will a first-time eye do on this page. Versus other predictive tools, it is self-serve from a free plan, never watermarks exports, ships white-label reports from a lower tier, and adds an AI audit and word-level copy analysis on top of the heatmap.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Heatpoints's answer:

CRO specialists, UX and web designers, marketers and founders who want to validate a page's visual hierarchy and messaging before launch. It is also built for people shipping pages fast with AI builders (Lovable, v0, Bolt, Cursor) who need a quick quality check, and for agencies who deliver white-label attention audits to clients.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Heatpoints's answer:

The attention engine is UniSAL, a peer-reviewed saliency model (ECCV 2020) running in PyTorch, trained on real human eye-tracking datasets. The backend is Python/FastAPI, page capture runs on Playwright/Chromium, the frontend is Next.js, and data is stored in MongoDB. There is also a public REST API and an MCP server for AI agent workflows.

What's the story behind your product?

Heatpoints's answer:

AI now generates landing pages faster than anyone can judge them — but nothing checks whether a human will actually look at the right place before the page ships. Heatpoints was built to be that visual QA step: paste a URL or a mockup and see where attention lands, before you pay for traffic. It's an independent product by Dropnir, built to make attention testing instant, deterministic and consent-free.

User comments

Share your experience with using Lobby Code and Heatpoints. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with