Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

LoadUIWeb VS LoadComplete

Compare LoadUIWeb VS LoadComplete and see what are their differences

ScreenshotMAX
The all-in-one Screenshot API for developers: capture websites, generate PDFs, record videos, and automate it all with powerful, scalable infrastructure. No browser setup, no hassle. Just clean results, fast. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

LoadUIWeb logo LoadUIWeb

LoadUIWeb is a free desktop tool for performance, stress, scalability and load testing of web...

LoadComplete logo LoadComplete

The only load testing tool to record, replay, and test in real browsers at scale.
  • LoadUIWeb Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-26
  • LoadComplete Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-01

LoadUIWeb features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    LoadUIWeb offers a user-friendly interface that allows testers to create and execute load tests with minimal technical expertise required.
  • Integration
    The tool integrates well with other testing and development tools, allowing for smoother workflows and easier management of test environments.
  • Customizable Test Scenarios
    LoadUIWeb provides customizable test scenario options, enabling users to tailor tests to meet specific application requirements.
  • Real-time Monitoring
    It provides real-time monitoring and reporting capabilities, giving users immediate insights into performance issues and bottlenecks.
  • Scalability
    The software is capable of handling large-scale load testing scenarios, making it suitable for testing the performance of applications under significant traffic.

Possible disadvantages of LoadUIWeb

  • Limited Community Support
    LoadUIWeb has a smaller user community compared to more established load testing tools, which may result in fewer resources and forums for troubleshooting and guidance.
  • Cost
    The licensing cost of LoadUIWeb can be high for small organizations or individual developers, potentially making it less accessible for those with a limited budget.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic functionalities are user-friendly, mastering advanced features and customization options may require a steeper learning curve.
  • Limited Protocol Support
    Compared to some advanced load testing tools, LoadUIWeb may have limited support for certain protocols, which can be a limitation for testing specific types of applications.
  • Dependency on Other Tools
    Although it offers integration benefits, LoadUIWeb may rely on other tools for complete testing solutions, which can complicate test setups.

LoadComplete features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    LoadComplete offers an intuitive interface that allows users to easily set up and execute load tests without needing extensive technical knowledge.
  • Comprehensive Reporting
    The tool provides detailed reports and analytics, making it easier for users to understand performance metrics and identify bottlenecks.
  • Integration Capabilities
    LoadComplete integrates well with various CI/CD tools, enhancing its utility in automated testing environments.
  • Real Browser Testing
    It enables testing using real browsers, ensuring that load tests closely simulate real user interactions and provide more accurate performance data.

Possible disadvantages of LoadComplete

  • Cost
    The pricing of LoadComplete can be high for small organizations or individuals, potentially limiting its accessibility for budget-conscious users.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running extensive tests may require significant computing resources, which could impact other operations if not managed properly.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its usability, some aspects of the tool might have a learning curve, especially for users unfamiliar with load testing concepts.
  • Limited Protocol Support
    Compared to some other load testing tools, LoadComplete may support fewer protocols, which could be a limitation for testing complex systems.

Analysis of LoadComplete

Overall verdict

  • LoadComplete (LoadNinja) is a powerful and reliable tool for teams looking for a comprehensive, scalable solution to performance testing. It's especially beneficial for teams that require ease of use and the ability to quickly execute and iterate tests without deep technical expertise in testing frameworks.

Why this product is good

  • LoadComplete, or LoadNinja, is renowned for its user-friendly interface and robust performance testing capabilities. It allows testers to create and execute performance tests without extensive programming knowledge, making it accessible to various users. Its cloud-based infrastructure facilitates realistic load testing scenarios by simulating thousands of users without the need for significant hardware investments. Additionally, its integration capabilities with popular CI/CD tools streamline the testing process within modern development workflows. LoadComplete also provides detailed analytics and reporting, helping teams identify performance bottlenecks and optimize applications efficiently.

Recommended for

  • Development teams looking for seamless integration with existing CI/CD pipelines
  • QA teams seeking a user-friendly interface for performance testing
  • Organizations that need to conduct scalable cloud-based load testing
  • Businesses aiming to identify and resolve performance issues rapidly to improve user experience

LoadUIWeb videos

No LoadUIWeb videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

LoadComplete videos

+ Add

LoadComplete 101: Getting Started in LoadComplete | SmartBear Academy

More videos:

  • Review - Hello Yogurt Game Review 1080p Official LoadComplete
  • Review - Hello Yogurt Game Review 1080p Official LoadComplete

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LoadUIWeb and LoadComplete)

LoadUIWeb

LoadComplete

Monitoring Tools
51 51%
Monitoring Tools
49% 49
Website Testing
43 43%
Website Testing
57% 57
Online Services
59 59%
Online Services
41% 41
Development
0 0%
Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using LoadUIWeb and LoadComplete. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, LoadComplete seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LoadUIWeb mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of LoadUIWeb yet. Tracking of LoadUIWeb recommendations started around Mar 2021.

LoadComplete mentions (1)

  • Automated Performance Testing?
    Browser Testing: Hit pages with virtual users performing a flow e.g. Sign up, login. If you want a report of how many "real" users can use your app concurrently, then this testing would give the closest "real" world statistics. Cons - price and requires JS/TS scripting knowledge. Tools: BrowserStorm, Flood.IO, LoadNinja. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LoadUIWeb and LoadComplete, you can also consider the following products

LoadFocus - Cloud Testing Infrastructure | Cloud Testing Services and Tools for Websites & APIs.

WebLOAD - WebLOAD - The most flexible and cost effective software for enterprise load, stress and performance testing, integrated with DevOps processes. Click for details

Loader.io - Loader.io is a simple cloud-based load testing service

OctoPerf - OctoPerf is a SaaS load testing solution, based on JMeter.

Loadster - Loadster is a full-featured load testing solution for websites, web apps, and web services.

k6 Cloud - Managed load testing service built on top of the popular open-source project k6.

Loading...