Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Loader.io VS ReadyAPI Performance

Compare Loader.io VS ReadyAPI Performance and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Loader.io logo Loader.io

Loader.io is a simple cloud-based load testing service

ReadyAPI Performance logo ReadyAPI Performance

ReadyAPI Performance is a platform that offers Load Testing for REST and SOAP APIs, Microservices, and Databases.
  • Loader.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-26
  • ReadyAPI Performance Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-29

Loader.io features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Loader.io offers a straightforward and intuitive user interface, making it easy for users to set up and run load tests without a steep learning curve.
  • Quick Test Setup
    With Loader.io, you can quickly set up load tests by simply verifying your website, inputting the target URL, and defining parameters such as duration and the number of clients.
  • Scalability
    Loader.io allows you to scale your tests from a few clients to hundreds of thousands, accommodating different testing needs.
  • Free Tier
    Loader.io offers a free tier that allows users to perform basic load testing, which is great for small projects or initial testing phases.
  • Integration
    Loader.io integrates well with other services and CI/CD pipelines, enabling automated performance testing as part of your development workflow.

Possible disadvantages of Loader.io

  • Limited Test Duration
    The free tier and some lower-tier plans have limitations on the duration of load tests, which might not be sufficient for testing long-running processes.
  • Complex Scenarios
    Loader.io may not support highly complex testing scenarios out-of-the-box, such as tests requiring advanced scripting or multi-step transactions.
  • Resource Limitations
    High concurrency and load levels may require higher-tier plans, which can become costly for larger-scale testing.
  • Geographic Limitations
    There may be limitations on the geographical distribution of clients, which could affect tests intended to simulate traffic from varied regions.
  • Reporting
    While Loader.io provides basic reporting, it may lack the depth and customization options offered by some other performance testing tools, such as detailed analytics and advanced visualization features.

ReadyAPI Performance features and specs

  • Comprehensive Testing
    ReadyAPI Performance offers extensive capabilities for testing APIs, including automated performance testing alongside functional, security, and virtualization within a single platform. This integration ensures thorough evaluation of API behavior under various conditions.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform provides an intuitive graphical interface, making it accessible to both technical and non-technical users for creating and executing performance tests without requiring advanced coding skills.
  • Integration with Popular CI/CD Tools
    ReadyAPI Performance seamlessly integrates with continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) tools like Jenkins, Azure DevOps, and Git, facilitating automated testing and accelerated development pipelines.
  • Real-Time Analytics and Reporting
    It offers real-time analytics and dynamic reporting features that provide immediate insights into performance bottlenecks and test results, helping teams make swift data-driven decisions.
  • Support for Multiple Protocols
    The tool supports a wide range of protocols such as REST, SOAP, GraphQL, and others, enabling comprehensive performance testing across diverse API types.

Possible disadvantages of ReadyAPI Performance

  • Cost
    ReadyAPI Performance can be expensive for small businesses or individual developers, as it is a commercial product with licensing fees that might not fit all budgets.
  • Resource Intensive
    The platform might require significant system resources for running extensive performance tests, which could impact other applications if not managed properly on less powerful machines.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While ReadyAPI Performance is designed to be user-friendly, leveraging its advanced features and integrations might require a deeper learning curve and familiarity with the environment.
  • Occasional Performance Issues
    Some users have reported that the application can suffer from lags or slow performance, particularly when handling very large datasets or executing complex test scenarios.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to open-source solutions, ReadyAPI Performance may have less community-driven support and resources, putting more reliance on official support and documentation provided by SmartBear.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Loader.io and ReadyAPI Performance)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Website Testing
56 56%
44% 44
Development
0 0%
100% 100
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Loader.io and ReadyAPI Performance. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Loader.io seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Loader.io mentions (22)

  • express server failing after high number of requests in digital ocean droplet with high configuration
    I wanted to see how many requests can this server handle, so I have used loader.io and run10k requests for 15 seconds. But it seems 20% percent of request fail due to timeout, and the response time keep increasing. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Why everyone says PostgreSQL better then mongo?
    I ran on the same hardware 5k current get requests through https://loader.io/ tool to the server with each db. Source: about 2 years ago
  • free-for.dev
    Loader.io — Free load testing tools with limitations. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • How to stress test my website?
    We put 50 servers of puppets against 50 http servers and see who wins. Ever had 10,000 in your checkout line at once? loader.io is for posers. Also what if there's 250,000 wanting to join the checkout line. Well we can scale to the moon and not handle that. I recommend a waiting room like Queue It. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Best Way to Benchmark Web Hosting?
    I've used what you said, identical setups (with Wordpress) and some plugins: WordPress Hosting Benchmark tool and WP Performance Tester plus some runs with loader.io. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

ReadyAPI Performance mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of ReadyAPI Performance yet. Tracking of ReadyAPI Performance recommendations started around Mar 2022.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Loader.io and ReadyAPI Performance, you can also consider the following products

locust - An open source load testing tool written in Python.

dotCover - JetBrains dotCover is a .NET unit test runner and code coverage tool that integrates with Visual Studio.

Apache JMeter - Apache JMeter™.

DevTest - Test management solution for efficient quality assurance

k6 Cloud - Managed load testing service built on top of the popular open-source project k6.

CyberFlood - CyberFlood is a best-in-class solution that enables you to test the scalability and performance of your app-aware solutions.