Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

LoadComplete VS Apache JMeter

Compare LoadComplete VS Apache JMeter and see what are their differences

ScreenshotMAX
The all-in-one Screenshot API for developers: capture websites, generate PDFs, record videos, and automate it all with powerful, scalable infrastructure. No browser setup, no hassle. Just clean results, fast. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

LoadComplete logo LoadComplete

The only load testing tool to record, replay, and test in real browsers at scale.

Apache JMeter logo Apache JMeter

Apache JMeter™.
  • LoadComplete Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-01
  • Apache JMeter Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29

LoadComplete features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    LoadComplete offers an intuitive interface that allows users to easily set up and execute load tests without needing extensive technical knowledge.
  • Comprehensive Reporting
    The tool provides detailed reports and analytics, making it easier for users to understand performance metrics and identify bottlenecks.
  • Integration Capabilities
    LoadComplete integrates well with various CI/CD tools, enhancing its utility in automated testing environments.
  • Real Browser Testing
    It enables testing using real browsers, ensuring that load tests closely simulate real user interactions and provide more accurate performance data.

Possible disadvantages of LoadComplete

  • Cost
    The pricing of LoadComplete can be high for small organizations or individuals, potentially limiting its accessibility for budget-conscious users.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running extensive tests may require significant computing resources, which could impact other operations if not managed properly.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its usability, some aspects of the tool might have a learning curve, especially for users unfamiliar with load testing concepts.
  • Limited Protocol Support
    Compared to some other load testing tools, LoadComplete may support fewer protocols, which could be a limitation for testing complex systems.

Apache JMeter features and specs

  • Open Source
    Apache JMeter is free to use, reducing the overall cost of testing and allowing for significant customization by the community.
  • Extensibility
    JMeter is highly extensible with plugins, which can add additional functionalities and capabilities tailored to specific needs.
  • Strong Community Support
    Due to its long history and widespread usage, JMeter benefits from a large, active community that provides tutorials, plugins, and troubleshooting help.
  • Supports Various Protocols
    JMeter supports a wide range of testing protocols, including HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, LDAP, JDBC, and JMS, making it versatile for different types of applications.
  • Continuous Integration
    JMeter can be easily integrated with CI/CD tools like Jenkins, enabling automated performance testing in the development pipeline.
  • Graphical Interface
    The graphical user interface (GUI) makes it easier for testers to design and configure testing scenarios without extensive programming knowledge.

Possible disadvantages of Apache JMeter

  • Resource Intensive
    JMeter can be resource-intensive, especially when simulating high loads, which may require substantial hardware to mimic real-world scenarios.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Despite its GUI, JMeter can be complex to learn and use effectively, especially for those who are new to performance testing.
  • Limited Reporting
    JMeter's built-in reporting capabilities can be somewhat limited, requiring additional tools or plugins for more advanced reporting and analysis.
  • Not Ideal for UI Testing
    JMeter is not suitable for front-end or UI testing, as it is primarily designed for performance and load testing of backend services.
  • Memory Consumption
    The GUI mode, in particular, can consume a significant amount of memory, impacting performance during large-scale tests.

Analysis of LoadComplete

Overall verdict

  • LoadComplete (LoadNinja) is a powerful and reliable tool for teams looking for a comprehensive, scalable solution to performance testing. It's especially beneficial for teams that require ease of use and the ability to quickly execute and iterate tests without deep technical expertise in testing frameworks.

Why this product is good

  • LoadComplete, or LoadNinja, is renowned for its user-friendly interface and robust performance testing capabilities. It allows testers to create and execute performance tests without extensive programming knowledge, making it accessible to various users. Its cloud-based infrastructure facilitates realistic load testing scenarios by simulating thousands of users without the need for significant hardware investments. Additionally, its integration capabilities with popular CI/CD tools streamline the testing process within modern development workflows. LoadComplete also provides detailed analytics and reporting, helping teams identify performance bottlenecks and optimize applications efficiently.

Recommended for

  • Development teams looking for seamless integration with existing CI/CD pipelines
  • QA teams seeking a user-friendly interface for performance testing
  • Organizations that need to conduct scalable cloud-based load testing
  • Businesses aiming to identify and resolve performance issues rapidly to improve user experience

LoadComplete videos

+ Add

LoadComplete 101: Getting Started in LoadComplete | SmartBear Academy

More videos:

  • Review - Hello Yogurt Game Review 1080p Official LoadComplete
  • Review - Hello Yogurt Game Review 1080p Official LoadComplete

Apache JMeter videos

+ Add

Book Review - Master Apache JMeter - From load testing to DevOps

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LoadComplete and Apache JMeter)

LoadComplete

Apache JMeter

Monitoring Tools
100 100%
Monitoring Tools
0% 0
Website Testing
37 37%
Website Testing
63% 63
Software Testing
0 0%
Software Testing
100% 100
Development
100 100%
Development
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using LoadComplete and Apache JMeter. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare LoadComplete and Apache JMeter

LoadComplete Reviews

We have no reviews of LoadComplete yet.
Be the first one to post

Apache JMeter Reviews

Top 20 Best Automation Testing Tools in 2019 (Comprehensive List)
Apache JMeter is an open-source Java desktop application designed for load testing. It mainly focuses on web applications. This tool can also be employed for unit testing and limited functional testing.
Source: www.softwaretestinghelp.com
Top 20 Best Automation Testing Tools in 2018 (Comprehensive List)
Apache JMeter is an open-source Java desktop application designed for load testing. It mainly focuses on web applications. This tool can also be employed for unit testing and limited functional testing.
Source: www.softwaretestinghelp.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache JMeter should be more popular than LoadComplete. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LoadComplete mentions (1)

  • Automated Performance Testing?
    Browser Testing: Hit pages with virtual users performing a flow e.g. Sign up, login. If you want a report of how many "real" users can use your app concurrently, then this testing would give the closest "real" world statistics. Cons - price and requires JS/TS scripting knowledge. Tools: BrowserStorm, Flood.IO, LoadNinja. Source: over 4 years ago

Apache JMeter mentions (2)

  • Java naming facts
    Before Jakarta EE there was Apache Jakarta which was effectively the group name for Java based projects within the Apache project. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Are servers multithreaded by default?
    If you remove Spring from the equation you need to build the servlets yourself (according to the Sevlet API). You probably package the servlets in a war-file (with some configuration files), the war-file can then be deployed in a servlet server (ie Tomcat,). The sevlet servser usually handles the thread pool and other resources (ie database connection pools) for you, so you "only" have to provide a servlet that... Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LoadComplete and Apache JMeter, you can also consider the following products

WebLOAD - WebLOAD - The most flexible and cost effective software for enterprise load, stress and performance testing, integrated with DevOps processes. Click for details

soapUI - SoapUI Pro is one of the most prominent API testing platforms around, allowing developers to quickly prototype the functions of their apps and get them to market with little hassle.

OctoPerf - OctoPerf is a SaaS load testing solution, based on JMeter.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

SmartMeter.io - Performance Testing with Enterprise-Level Features with a familiar jMeter interface

locust - An open source load testing tool written in Python.

Loading...