Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
LTU
F

LiveTcpUdpWatch VS Fping (open source)

Compare LiveTcpUdpWatch VS Fping (open source) and see what are their differences

Hyperview
DCIM software reinvented. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

LiveTcpUdpWatch logo LiveTcpUdpWatch

LiveTcpUdpWatch is a tool for Windows that displays live information about all TCP and UDP activity on your system.

Fping (open source) logo Fping (open source)

fping is a program to send ICMP echo probes to network hosts, similar to ping, but much better performing when pinging multiple hosts.
  • LiveTcpUdpWatch Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19
  • Fping (open source) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-14

LiveTcpUdpWatch features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Fping (open source) features and specs

  • Speed
    Fping is designed to send out multiple ICMP Echo Requests in parallel, allowing it to quickly scan large numbers of hosts compared to traditional ping commands.
  • Scripting Friendly
    Fping is suitable for use in shell scripts due to its output format, making it useful for automated network monitoring and management tasks.
  • IPv4 and IPv6 Support
    Fping supports both IPv4 and IPv6, providing flexibility for various network environments.
  • Customizable Options
    It offers a wide range of options for setting the number of pings, intervals, and timing, allowing users to tailor the tool to suit specific needs.
  • Resource Efficiency
    Fping consumes fewer system resources compared to some GUI-based network tools, making it ideal for running on servers and low-power devices.

Possible disadvantages of Fping (open source)

  • Command-Line Interface Only
    Fping does not have a graphical user interface, which may make it less accessible to users who are not familiar with command-line operations.
  • Advanced Configuration Complexity
    While it is highly configurable, the range of options and parameters can be overwhelming for new users who may not have a deep understanding of networking.
  • Limited To Echo Requests
    Fping is designed specifically for ICMP Echo Requests, limiting its usefulness for scenarios that require more in-depth network diagnostics.
  • Lack of Built-In Analysis
    Unlike some more comprehensive network monitoring tools, Fping does not include features for detailed analysis and visualization of network data.
  • Potential Security Restrictions
    Some networks may have security policies that restrict the use of ICMP packets, which could limit Fping's effectiveness or even prevent it from functioning.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LiveTcpUdpWatch and Fping (open source))

LiveTcpUdpWatch

Fping (open source)

Monitoring Tools
12 12%
Monitoring Tools
88% 88
Log Management
35 35%
Log Management
65% 65
Security
14 14%
Security
86% 86
OS & Utilities
0 0%
OS & Utilities
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using LiveTcpUdpWatch and Fping (open source). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LiveTcpUdpWatch and Fping (open source), you can also consider the following products

Cyclr - Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS.

Ping Meter Gadget - Customizable, graphical, semi-transparent ping (latency) meter.

Wireshark - Wireshark is a network protocol analyzer for Unix and Windows. It lets you capture and interactively browse the traffic running on a computer network.

Open Nettest - Open Nettest is a platform for collecting, processing and visualizing data related QoS and QoE.

Fing - Discover which devices are connected to any Wi-Fi network, map devices, detect intruders, assess...

KeyCDN Tools - Website speed test, online curl, ping tool, https/2 and other services

Loading...