Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Live Tennis API VS Objects

Compare Live Tennis API VS Objects and see what are their differences

Live Tennis API

Real-time tennis data and model analysis over REST + WebSocket. ATP, WTA, Challenger, ITF — singles and doubles.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium $9.99 / Monthly (Basic — history + point-by-point, 1k req/day)
Alternatives Is it good?
Objects

An online tool to create instructions and user manuals for providing quality customer care

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Live Tennis API
Objects
Website livetennisapi.com objects.to
Pricing
Freemium $9.99 / Monthly (Basic — history + point-by-point, 1k req/day) Official pricing
Official pricing
Platforms
REST API Python JavaScript Node JS SaaS WebSocket +3
—
Company Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 —
Listed in
Sports Scores Developer APIs Sports Live Scores APIs +2
Customer Care Customer Support SaaS

About Live Tennis API and Objects

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Live Tennis API
Objects

Live Tennis API is a real-time tennis data API for developers, traders and analysts. One REST + WebSocket feed covers ATP, WTA, Challenger and ITF — singles and doubles. What you get Live scores updated point by point, with full match state (server, game and set score, tiebreaks) Fixtures, player...

Read more about Live Tennis API

No description of Objects yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Live Tennis API 12 features
Objects 5 features
  • Coverage
    ATP, WTA, Challenger and ITF — singles and doubles
  • Live scores
    Point-by-point, sub-second, with server, game/set score and tiebreak state
  • Streaming
    WebSocket push feed and webhooks for live matches (Ultra)
  • Win-probability
    Model win-probability and analysis on every live point (Ultra)
  • Market odds
    Match-winner market odds (Pro)
  • Match history
    Completed results, events and timeline; point-by-point match tape back to 2023
  • In-play statistics
    Aces, double faults, serve split, hold/break, break points (Ultra)
  • Rankings
    As-of-match ATP/WTA, ITF and UTR rankings for backtests
  • Shot-level charting
    Serve direction, rally construction and serve/return charting for 11,000+ matches back to 1960
  • Developer tooling
    OpenAPI 3.1 spec, official Python and JavaScript SDKs, MCP server for AI agents
  • Rate limits
    Free 30 req/min · 100/day up to Ultra 600 req/min · 500k/day
  • Format
    JSON over REST, UTC timestamps, read-only, bearer-key auth
  • Decentralized Object Storage
    Objects.to provides decentralized storage solutions, allowing users to store data across distributed networks rather than relying on a single centralized server, which enhances data resilience and reduces single points of failure.
  • Web3 and Blockchain Integration
    The platform is designed with Web3 principles in mind, making it well-suited for developers building decentralized applications (dApps) that need reliable and censorship-resistant storage.
  • Simple API and Developer Experience
    Objects.to offers a straightforward API that makes it relatively easy for developers to integrate decentralized storage into their projects without needing deep expertise in the underlying protocols.
  • Content Persistence
    Data stored through Objects.to benefits from content-addressable storage mechanisms, helping ensure that files remain available and verifiable over time without risk of link rot or unauthorized modification.
  • Cost-Effective Storage
    Compared to traditional cloud storage providers, Objects.to can offer competitive pricing by leveraging decentralized storage networks, potentially reducing costs for developers and businesses storing large amounts of data.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Mainstream Adoption
    Objects.to is a relatively niche platform compared to established cloud storage providers like AWS S3 or Google Cloud Storage, which means fewer community resources, tutorials, and third-party integrations are available.
  • Performance and Latency Concerns
    Decentralized storage can sometimes suffer from higher latency and slower retrieval speeds compared to centralized cloud services that have globally distributed CDNs and optimized infrastructure.
  • Reliability and Uptime Uncertainty
    As a smaller and newer platform, Objects.to may not offer the same level of guaranteed uptime and SLAs that enterprise-grade centralized storage providers commit to.
  • Learning Curve for Non-Web3 Developers
    Developers unfamiliar with decentralized storage concepts, content addressing, and Web3 paradigms may face a steeper learning curve when adopting Objects.to compared to traditional storage solutions.
  • Limited Documentation and Support
    Being a smaller platform, Objects.to may have less comprehensive documentation, fewer support channels, and slower response times for troubleshooting compared to major cloud providers with dedicated support teams.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Live Tennis API
Objects

No analysis of Live Tennis API yet.

Overall verdict

  • Objects.to is a niche link-in-bio and personal landing page tool. It appears to offer a minimalist way to consolidate links, but it has limited brand recognition compared to major competitors like Linktree, Bio.link, or Beacons, and detailed independent reviews or long-term reliability data are scarce.

Why this product is good

  • Simple, minimalist interface for creating a single landing page
  • Likely free or low-cost tier for basic use cases
  • Quick setup for consolidating multiple links in one place
  • Lightweight alternative if you dislike bloated link-in-bio tools

Recommended for

  • Individuals wanting a very basic, no-frills link page
  • Users experimenting with alternatives to mainstream link-in-bio services
  • Small creators who don't need advanced analytics or customization
  • Those prioritizing simplicity over extensive design options

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Live Tennis API 1 video + Add
Objects 0 videos + Add

Live Tennis API — Real-Time Tennis Scores over REST & WebSocket

No Objects videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Live Tennis API
Objects
100% 100%
Sports
0% 0%
0% 0%
SaaS
100% 100%
100% 100%
Developer APIs
0% 0%
0% 0%
Customer Support
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Live Tennis API and Objects.

What makes your product unique?

Live Tennis API's answer

Most sports-data APIs hand you a score every few seconds. Live Tennis API hands you the match point by point — server, game and set state, tiebreaks — with a model win-probability on every point, over one REST + WebSocket feed.

It covers the whole professional tour: ATP, WTA, Challenger and ITF, singles and doubles, not only the main-tour matches. And the same key opens the historical layer: point-by-point tapes back to 2023, match-winner market odds, as-of-match rankings for backtests, and shot-by-shot charting for 11,000+ matches going back to 1960.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Live Tennis API's answer

  • Depth: point-level live data, in-play statistics and win-probability, not just scores.
  • Coverage: ATP, WTA, Challenger and ITF — including the lower tiers many feeds skip.
  • Price: a free tier with no card, paid plans from $9.99/month, and Ultra at $99.99/month with 500k requests/day and the WebSocket feed.
  • Developer experience: OpenAPI 3.1 spec, official Python and JavaScript SDKs, an MCP server for AI agents, instant keys, and upgrades prorated in place on the same key.
  • Honesty about coverage: a /history/coverage endpoint states the measured completeness per tour and season instead of promising 100%.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Live Tennis API's answer

Developers and small teams building tennis products: live-score apps and dashboards, betting and trading models, fantasy and prediction tools, and AI agents that need structured tennis data.

A second group is researchers and quants who want point-by-point history, as-of-match rankings and shot-level charting for backtests.

The pricing is aimed at individual developers and startups rather than broadcasters.

What's the story behind your product?

Live Tennis API's answer

Live Tennis API started in 2026 as the data layer behind the founder's own tennis trading research: a point-by-point live feed with a win-probability model for every professional match, including Challenger and ITF.

Rather than keep it internal, the feed, the model and the historical tape were opened as a public API in July 2026, with a free tier so developers can try it without a card. It is operated by JSB Holdings LLC, a small Delaware company.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Live Tennis API's answer

  • Python (Flask, SQLAlchemy, scikit-learn) for the API and the win-probability model
  • PostgreSQL for match, point and odds storage
  • Redis and Centrifugo for the real-time WebSocket push feed
  • Cloudflare in front of the API; Stripe for billing
  • OpenAPI 3.1 spec, with official Python and JavaScript SDKs and an MCP server

User comments

Share your experience with using Live Tennis API and Objects. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Alternatives to Live Tennis API and Objects

When comparing Live Tennis API and Objects, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...