Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Live.js VS SiteFlow

Compare Live.js VS SiteFlow and see what are their differences

Zoviz
Zoviz: Professional Logos, Perfectly Personalized Your Brand. Your Story featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Live.js logo Live.js

Live. js. one script closer to designing in the browser. Say goodbye to Alt-Tab. Live.

SiteFlow logo SiteFlow

The life-saver app for web developers !
  • Live.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29
Not present

Live.js features and specs

  • Automatic Reload
    Live.js automatically reloads web pages whenever HTML, CSS, or JavaScript files are modified, which enhances developer productivity by immediately reflecting changes without manual refreshing.
  • Easy Setup
    The setup process for Live.js is straightforward, requiring minimal configuration. Developers only need to include a single script tag to start using it.
  • No Build Tools Required
    Live.js does not require any build tools or server environment, making it a lightweight option for quickly setting up live reload functionality without the complexity of integrating with other toolchains.
  • Real-time Preview
    Provides real-time preview of changes, which is beneficial for rapid prototyping and design iterations, improving the workflow for front-end developers.

Possible disadvantages of Live.js

  • Limited Feature Set
    Live.js offers basic functionality focused mainly on live reloading. It may not cover more advanced use cases or features that comprehensive development tools provide.
  • Inefficient for Large Projects
    For larger projects with many files, Live.js can become inefficient as it reloads the entire page, which might interrupt development flow and increase wait times.
  • Not Suitable for Production
    Live.js is meant for development environments and should not be used in production as it can expose internal file structures and is not optimized for performance.
  • No Customization
    Offers little to no options for customization or configuration, which might be a drawback for developers who need more control over the development environment behavior.

SiteFlow features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    SiteFlow offers a clean and intuitive user interface that makes navigation easy even for beginners.
  • Customizability
    The platform provides a range of templates and design options, allowing users to customize their sites extensively to match their branding needs.
  • Responsive Design
    Sites created with SiteFlow are automatically optimized for different devices, ensuring a seamless user experience on mobiles, tablets, and desktops.
  • Integrations
    SiteFlow supports integration with various third-party tools and platforms, enhancing functionality and connectivity.

Possible disadvantages of SiteFlow

  • Limited Advanced Features
    While suitable for basic site creation, SiteFlow may lack some advanced features needed for more complex web applications.
  • Pricing
    Some users may find the pricing model expensive, especially if advanced features or higher-tier plans are required.
  • Learning Curve for Customization
    Though customizable, fully utilizing the design options may require some learning and skill in web development.
  • Customer Support
    There may be limitations or delays in customer support, impacting the resolution of issues or obtaining help.

Live.js videos

No Live.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

SiteFlow videos

+ Add

Screencast Tutorial Website-Tool Siteflow

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Live.js and SiteFlow)

Live.js

SiteFlow

Image Optimisation
59 59%
Image Optimisation
41% 41
Developer Tools
54 54%
Developer Tools
46% 46
Design Tools
62 62%
Design Tools
38% 38
Health & Wellness
0 0%
Health & Wellness
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Live.js and SiteFlow. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Live.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Live.js mentions (3)

  • Can I skip the system checks?
    There's a crusty old script out there called Live.js. IIRC it sends a request to the server every second or so and if it detects a different content-length header it reloads the page. It's like a poor man's version of hot reloading. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Are there any lesser-known tools you use a lot in your work?
    Live.js - automatically refreshes the page when we edit the sources. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Is there a way to see your webpage while your edit it?
    Livejs (not tested it myself) looks like what your are looking for. Source: about 3 years ago

SiteFlow mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of SiteFlow yet. Tracking of SiteFlow recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Live.js and SiteFlow, you can also consider the following products

CodeKit - CodeKit allows you to optimize the performance of your website by automatically and efficiently compiling a variety of popular languages.

LiveReload - LiveReload 2 proudly presents… The Web Developer Wonderland. (a happy land where browsers don't need a Refresh button). CSS edits and image changes apply live. CoffeeScript, SASS, LESS and others just work.

Prepros - Compile Less, Sass, Scss, Stylus, Jade, Coffeescript, Haml and Markdown with live browser refresh.

Fire.app - Fire.app is a menu bar only app for dead easy HTML prototyping.

Browsersync - Browsersync makes your tweaking and testing faster by synchronising file changes and interactions...

Scout-App - Process Sass files into CSS without any knowledge of the command line.

Loading...