Software Alternatives & Startups

LinuxMCE VS Solid Explorer

Compare LinuxMCE VS Solid Explorer and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

LinuxMCE logo LinuxMCE

Home Automation based on Linux combining the most powerful OpenSource Projects around.

Solid Explorer logo Solid Explorer

Solid Explorer is a powerful Android file manager featuring access to most popular cloud storages, root access and easy extensibility.
  • LinuxMCE Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-01-29
  • Solid Explorer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-25

LinuxMCE features and specs

  • Open Source
    LinuxMCE is an open-source platform, which means it is free to use, modify, and distribute. Users can customize the system to meet their specific needs without worrying about licensing fees.
  • Integrated Solution
    It offers an integrated smart home and media solution, combining home automation, media management, and security features into a single package, which simplifies installation and management.
  • Customization
    LinuxMCE allows a high degree of customization, enabling users to tailor the system's functionality and appearance to suit their preferences and specific requirements.
  • Community Support
    Being an open-source project, it benefits from an active community of users and developers who contribute to forums, wikis, and other support resources.
  • Compatibility
    LinuxMCE is compatible with a wide range of devices and technologies, meaning users can integrate different brands and types of hardware into their system.

Possible disadvantages of LinuxMCE

  • Complex Installation
    The installation and setup process for LinuxMCE can be quite complex, especially for non-technical users, as it may require more advanced knowledge of networking and Linux systems.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive feature set and customization potential, LinuxMCE can have a steep learning curve, requiring users to spend time learning how to effectively use and manage the system.
  • Limited Hardware Support
    While LinuxMCE supports many devices, some specific or newer hardware devices might not be compatible or require additional configuration to work properly.
  • Inconsistent User Experience
    As with many open-source projects, the user interface and experience can be inconsistent, with some parts of the system being less polished than others.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running LinuxMCE can be resource-intensive, requiring a dedicated machine with significant processing power and storage, which could be a con for those with limited hardware resources.

Solid Explorer features and specs

  • User Interface
    Solid Explorer has a clean and visually appealing user interface that supports both light and dark themes, making it pleasant to use.
  • Dual-pane mode
    The app supports a dual-pane mode, which allows you to manage files in two different locations simultaneously, enhancing productivity.
  • Cloud Storage Integration
    Solid Explorer supports a wide range of cloud storage services like Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, and more, allowing for seamless file management across different platforms.
  • File Encryption
    The app includes features for encrypting and decrypting files, providing an extra layer of security for sensitive information.
  • Customization Options
    Solid Explorer offers extensive customization options, allowing users to change themes, icon sets, and layout to fit their preference.
  • Root Access
    It supports root access for rooted devices, enabling advanced file management tasks such as modifying system files.

Possible disadvantages of Solid Explorer

  • Payment Required
    Solid Explorer offers a 14-day trial period, after which a one-time payment is required to continue using the app, which might deter some users.
  • Occasional Bugs
    Some users have reported occasional bugs and crashes, which can disrupt the file management experience.
  • Storage Permissions
    The app requires extensive storage permissions, which some users might find concerning from a privacy standpoint.
  • Resource Intensive
    Solid Explorer can be resource-intensive, consuming more battery and memory compared to some of its competitors.
  • Limited Free Features
    While the app is feature-rich, the free version has limited functionalities, which could be a downside for users not willing to pay.

Analysis of Solid Explorer

Overall verdict

  • Solid Explorer is generally considered a good file management app, appreciated for its comprehensive functionality and ease of use. It is well-regarded for providing solid performance and reliability.

Why this product is good

  • Solid Explorer is popular for its clean and intuitive user interface, robust file management features, and strong support for cloud storage integration. It offers dual-pane navigation, file encryption, and extensive customization options, making it versatile for various file management needs.

Recommended for

  • Users looking for a feature-rich file manager with cloud integration
  • Those who appreciate customizable interfaces
  • Users who need efficient file management on Android devices
  • Individuals looking for secure file encryption options

LinuxMCE videos

LinuxMCE - Demonstration Video (2007-07-04)

More videos:

  • Review - LinuxMCE: Support for the SmartQ V7 MID as a Media Device
  • Review - LinuxMCE: Kitchen Squeezebox

Solid Explorer videos

Es File Explorer Vs Solid Explorer

More videos:

  • Review - 8 Cool Things You Can do with Solid Explorer - Best ES File Explorer Alternative
  • Review - best paid android apps 2016 - Solid explorer file manager (Review, Pros, Cons, Does It Worth It)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LinuxMCE and Solid Explorer)
Home
100 100%
0% 0
File Manager
0 0%
100% 100
Video
100 100%
0% 0
File Explorer
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using LinuxMCE and Solid Explorer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare LinuxMCE and Solid Explorer

LinuxMCE Reviews

We have no reviews of LinuxMCE yet.
Be the first one to post

Solid Explorer Reviews

The best third-party file managers for Android
Keep it simple with Simple File Manager Pro. Like Solid Explorer, the app is designed within the Material Design schematic, including using one floating action button to add a new file or folder. Simple File Manager Pro only works with localized files, however, and though it doesn't offer access to exterior cloud accounts, you can navigate root files, SD cards, and USB files...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Solid Explorer seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LinuxMCE mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of LinuxMCE yet. Tracking of LinuxMCE recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Solid Explorer mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LinuxMCE and Solid Explorer, you can also consider the following products

GeeXboX - Dec 3, 2017 - . Author: Tomtom 1 Comment. Hi,.

MiXplorer - MiXplorer is a mobile app that was designed to make it easy to organize and manage the files on your Android device.

LinHES - ChiliProject

Total Commander - A Shareware file manager for Windows® 95/98/ME/NT/2000/XP/Vista/7, and Windows® 3.1.

FHEM - FHEM (TM) is a GPL'd perl server for house automation.

Amaze File Manager - Free and open-source Android file manager with no ads.