LibreSpeed
Fast.com
SpeedOf.Me
Speedtest.net
Testmy.net
Speed Test by Cloudflare
nPerf
speedtest-cli
Woopy
OpsGenie
PagerDuty
Zenduty
Pingdom
StatusCake
Uptime Kuma
Woopy is incident response for developers who do not run a NOC. When your production app throws an exception, you get a push notification on your phone within seconds - and next to the alert there are buttons you define yourself: "Restart worker", "Clear cache", "Retry job". One tap fires an HMAC-signed webhook (Standard Webhooks spec) back at your infrastructure, and the incident is handled before you find a laptop.
Integration is one npm package (@woopysdk/node, ISC licensed) with a single call in your catch block, or a plain HTTP POST from any language. Signup to first push takes under 2 minutes. Every action run is logged with its HTTP status, so "did the restart actually go through?" always has an answer.
Woopy is deliberately NOT a full incident-management platform: no on-call schedules, no escalation policies, no phone calls. It is built for solo developers, freelancers maintaining client apps, and small agencies - and priced accordingly: per app, not per seat. Free for 2 apps; Pro $9/mo for 10 apps; Team $49/mo flat for 50 apps with unlimited responders.
LibreSpeed WoopyWoopy's answer:
Woopy is built by a solo founder and a frontend co-founder, in public. The itch: when you maintain production apps for clients, you find out about crashes from the client, and fixing anything means finding a laptop. Existing incident tools assume a team and a NOC; error trackers tell you what broke but give you no way to act. Woopy closes that loop - a push within seconds of the exception, and a button next to it that actually fixes the problem.
Woopy's answer:
Woopy's answer:
Woopy pairs every crash alert with one-tap remediation actions. Alerting alone is a commodity - what makes Woopy different is what happens after the push: next to the alert there are buttons you define yourself ("Restart worker", "Clear cache", "Retry job"), and one tap fires an HMAC-signed webhook (Standard Webhooks spec) at your infrastructure. The incident is handled from your phone, before you find a laptop. Every action run is logged with its HTTP result, so "did the restart actually go through?" always has an answer.
Woopy's answer:
Most incident-management platforms (PagerDuty, Opsgenie, Zenduty) are built for teams running a NOC: on-call schedules, escalation policies, per-seat pricing. If you are a solo developer or a small agency maintaining client apps, you pay for machinery you never use. Woopy deliberately skips all of that and adds the one thing they lack: remediation actions next to the alert. Pricing is per app, not per seat - free for 2 apps, Pro $9/mo for 10 apps, Team $49/mo flat for 50 apps with unlimited responders. Integration is one npm package or a plain HTTP POST; signup to first push takes under 2 minutes.
Woopy's answer:
Solo developers, freelancers maintaining client apps, and small agencies - people who are personally responsible for production but do not run a NOC and cannot justify per-seat incident-management pricing. If your "on-call rotation" is just you and your phone, Woopy is built for you.
Woopy's answer:
Backend: Ruby on Rails (API mode) with PostgreSQL, Sidekiq and Redis. Web dashboard: React with Vite. Mobile apps (iOS and Android): Capacitor, with push delivery via APNs and FCM. SDK: Node.js (@woopysdk/node, ISC licensed), plus a plain REST API for any language. Outbound remediation actions follow the Standard Webhooks spec with HMAC signatures.
Based on our record, LibreSpeed seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 33 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Try hosting a DIY speed test on a cloud server (like Google colab or the free oracle instances or whatever): https://github.com/librespeed/speedtest. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
It should be DIA. They provide the internet connection to the company since 2 decades and it's a very small ISP, so it's very vague in terms of contract. Iperf was giving me very terrible results with TCP, UDP was giving me a couple of Gbit/s throughput, definitely a wrong result. We are using this self hosted speedtest. All my results above are based on this software: Https://github.com/librespeed/speedtest. Source: over 3 years ago
Put a copy of Librespeed on a web server that's accessible through the VPN and told them to use that. For (our) convenience, it's logged into a database that's correlated with the VPN login/logout times so the users don't even need to log in to use it, but we still know whose test result it is. Source: over 3 years ago
There is a selfhosted solution for speed testing called LibreSpeed. You could try it and see the results. Source: over 3 years ago
In this particular instance though, adolfintel appears to be the developer of Librespeed. The official documentation in that GitHub repo points to that docker image by adolfintel. Therefore, it counts as the official docker image in my book. Source: over 3 years ago
Fast.com - Quickly test your internet speed with this fast-loading speed test powered by Netflix.
OpsGenie - Alerting and On-Call Management for Dev&Ops Teams
SpeedOf.Me - SpeedOf.Me is an HTML5 Internet speed test. No Flash or Java needed!
PagerDuty - Cloud based monitoring service
Speedtest.net - Test your Internet connection bandwidth to locations around the world with this interactive broadband speed test from Ookla
Zenduty - Zenduty is a state of the art incident management solution that provides cross-channel alerts to your team whenever critical incidents occur.