Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Laravel Boilerplate VS Protobuf

Compare Laravel Boilerplate VS Protobuf and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Laravel Boilerplate logo Laravel Boilerplate

Laravel Boilerplate provides a very flexible and extensible way of building your custom Laravel applications.

Protobuf logo Protobuf

Protocol buffers are a language-neutral, platform-neutral extensible mechanism for serializing structured data.
  • Laravel Boilerplate Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-13
  • Protobuf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-29

Laravel Boilerplate features and specs

  • Rapid Development
    Laravel Boilerplate provides a structured starting point with pre-built modules and components, facilitating faster development of web applications by reducing the setup time.
  • Comprehensive Features
    It includes a range of features such as authentication, authorization, user profiles, and roles management out of the box, which can save developers time in building common functionalities.
  • Consistent Code Structure
    The boilerplate enforces a consistent code structure, which is beneficial for team projects and maintaining code quality, especially in large applications.
  • Community Support
    Being an open-source project, it benefits from community contributions and support, providing users with a resource for troubleshooting and enhancements.
  • Customizability
    While providing a predefined structure, it allows for customization to suit specific project requirements, offering flexibility to developers.

Possible disadvantages of Laravel Boilerplate

  • Overhead
    Using a boilerplate can introduce additional complexity and overhead, especially if many of the built-in features are not needed by a particular project.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers unfamiliar with the specific implementation details of the boilerplate may need to spend time learning its conventions and structure.
  • Dependency Management
    The boilerplate relies on a variety of third-party packages, which may sometimes lead to dependency conflicts and require careful management.
  • Updates and Maintenance
    Keeping up with updates can be challenging, as boilerplate users must ensure compatibility with new releases and maintain the boilerplate alongside their own code.
  • Potential for Bloat
    Applications may become bloated with unnecessary features if developers do not selectively choose which components to use, impacting performance and manageability.

Protobuf features and specs

  • Efficient Serialization
    Protobuf is known for its high efficiency in serializing structured data. It is faster and produces smaller size messages compared to JSON or XML, making it ideal for bandwidth-limited and resource-constrained environments.
  • Language Support
    Protobuf supports multiple programming languages including Java, C++, Python, Ruby, and Go. This makes it versatile and useful in heterogeneous environments.
  • Versioning Support
    It natively supports schema evolution without breaking existing implementations. Fields can be added or removed over time, ensuring backward and forward compatibility.
  • Type Safety
    Being a strongly typed data format, Protobuf ensures that data is correctly typed across different systems, preventing serialization and deserialization errors common with loosely typed formats.

Possible disadvantages of Protobuf

  • Learning Curve
    Protobuf requires learning and understanding its schema definitions and compiler usage, which might be a challenge for new developers.
  • Lack of Human Readability
    Serialized Protobuf data is in a binary format, making it less readable and debuggable compared to JSON or XML without specialized tools.
  • Limited Built-in Support for Complex Data Types
    By default, Protobuf does not provide comprehensive support for handling complex data types like maps or unions compared to some other data serialization formats, requiring workarounds.
  • Tooling Requirement
    Using Protobuf necessitates a compilation step where `.proto` files are converted into code, requiring additional tooling and build system integration.

Laravel Boilerplate videos

No Laravel Boilerplate videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Protobuf videos

+ Add

StreamBerry, part 2 : introduction to Google ProtoBuf

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Laravel Boilerplate and Protobuf)

Laravel Boilerplate

Protobuf

Developer Tools
16 16%
Developer Tools
84% 84
Web Frameworks
100 100%
Web Frameworks
0% 0
Web Servers
0 0%
Web Servers
100% 100
PHP MVC Framework
100 100%
PHP MVC Framework
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Laravel Boilerplate and Protobuf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Protobuf seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 83 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Laravel Boilerplate mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Laravel Boilerplate yet. Tracking of Laravel Boilerplate recommendations started around Jan 2023.

Protobuf mentions (83)

  • JSON vs Protocol Buffers vs FlatBuffers: A Deep Dive
    Protocol Buffers, developed by Google, is a compact and efficient binary serialization format designed for high-performance data exchange. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Developing games on and for Mac and Linux
    Protocol Buffers: https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Adding Codable conformance to Union with Metaprogramming
    ProtocolBuffers’ OneOf message addresses the case of having a message with many fields where at most one field will be set at the same time. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • Logcat is awful. What would you improve?
    That's definitely the bigger thing. I think something like Protocol Buffers (Protobuf) is what you're looking for there. Output the data and consume it by something that can handle the analysis. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Bitcoin is the "narrow waist" of internet-based value
    These protocols prevent an O(N x M) explosion of code that have to solve for many cases. For example, since JSON is an almost ubiquitous format for wire transfer (although other things do exist like protobufs), if I had N data formats that I want to serialize, I only need to write N serializers/deserializers (SerDes). If there was no such narrow waist and there were M alternatives to JSON in wide usage, I would... Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Laravel Boilerplate and Protobuf, you can also consider the following products

JetShip Laravel Boilerplate - Jetship Laravel SaaS Boilerplate PRO. The best Laravel 11 SaaS Starter Kit for fast, & scalable web apps. Built with FlyOnUI & Tailwind CSS.

gRPC - Application and Data, Languages & Frameworks, Remote Procedure Call (RPC), and Service Discovery

SaaS Boilerplate - Launch a SaaS business faster with this boilerplate app

Messagepack - An efficient binary serialization format.

SaaS Boilerplate by Apptension - What problem does SaaS Boilerplate solve? SaaS Boilerplate is the developer’s way out of the vicious circle of redeveloping dull and repetitive features. Never waste time on building features every SaaS includes.

Apache Thrift - An interface definition language and communication protocol for creating cross-language services.

Loading...