KWin VS Window Maker

• Feature-Rich
  KWin offers a wide range of features and customization options, including advanced window management capabilities and desktop effects, which make it highly versatile for users.
• Integration with KDE
  As the default window manager for the KDE Plasma desktop environment, KWin is tightly integrated, providing seamless performance and appearance consistency across KDE applications.
• High Customizability
  Users can extensively customize KWin to suit their needs, including configuring keyboard shortcuts, window rules, and visual effects to enhance productivity and aesthetics.
• Open Source
  Being an open-source project, KWin is free to use and modify, with a community of contributors that helps to maintain and improve the software.

Possible disadvantages

• Resource Intensive
  KWin can be resource-heavy, particularly when using extensive graphical effects, which may not be suitable for older or less powerful hardware.
• Complex Configuration
  For users not familiar with KDE or Linux window managers, KWin’s numerous options and settings can be overwhelming and may require a learning curve to utilize effectively.
• KDE Dependency
  While KWin can run independently, it primarily supports KDE and may not integrate as well with other desktop environments, limiting its use outside of KDE.
• Occasional Stability Issues
  Some users report bugs and crashes with KWin, especially when using cutting-edge or experimental features, which could affect the stability of the desktop experience.

• Lightweight
  Window Maker is known for its low resource consumption, making it ideal for older computers and systems with limited hardware capabilities.
• Fast Performance
  Due to its minimalistic design, Window Maker offers fast performance and quick response times, enhancing the user experience.
• Customizability
  Users have significant flexibility to customize the appearance and functionality of the desktop environment to suit their personal preferences.
• GNUstep Integration
  It offers seamless integration with GNUstep, supporting a consistent environment for applications developed with this framework.
• Stable and Mature
  As a long-standing project, Window Maker has a history of stability and has been thoroughly tested over many years, ensuring reliability.

Possible disadvantages

• Steeper Learning Curve
  New users may find it challenging to configure and operate due to its unique interface and design paradigms compared to more conventional desktop environments.
• Limited Features
  Compared to modern desktop environments, Window Maker may lack some advanced features and conveniences, which could be a downside for users expecting them.
• Less Active Development
  Window Maker does not receive updates as frequently as some other environments, which may affect the availability of new features and bug fixes.
• Compatibility
  While it integrates well with GNUstep, compatibility issues may arise with applications not designed with this framework in mind.

Review Sih KWIN | KLX Gordon Yang Menggoyahkan Iman

More videos

Testor Window Maker

Tracking KWin since Mar 2021.

• Any suggestions for a tiling WM?

  Look at windowmaker.org Very configurable, tiles if you want, lots of little gadgets work with it. Always been one of my favorites! Source: about 5 years ago