Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Keycloak VS Ping-API

Compare Keycloak VS Ping-API and see what are their differences

Proton Pass for Business
End-to-end encrypted password manager built for teams. Secure every login, share credentials safely, and keep all your business accounts protected with zero-knowledge encryption and Swiss privacy laws you can trust. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Keycloak logo Keycloak

Open Source Identity and Access Management for modern Applications and Services.

Ping-API logo Ping-API

Automated API testing and monitoring.
  • Keycloak Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-20
  • Ping-API Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-22

Keycloak features and specs

  • Open-Source
    Keycloak is an open-source identity and access management solution, which means it is free to use and has a community-driven support system. This can lead to lower costs and more flexibility compared to proprietary solutions.
  • Feature-Rich
    Keycloak offers a comprehensive set of features including single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), user federation, identity brokering, and social login. This makes it suitable for a wide range of use cases.
  • Customizability
    With Keycloak, you can customize the authentication and authorization processes through its extensible architecture, allowing for the addition of custom features and integrations.
  • Integration Capability
    Keycloak supports integration with various protocols such as OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, and SAML, making it versatile for integrating with different platforms and services.
  • Active Community
    Keycloak has an active and growing community of developers and users who contribute to its improvement and provide support, resources, and shared knowledge.

Possible disadvantages of Keycloak

  • Complexity
    Keycloak can be complex to set up and configure, especially for users who are not familiar with identity and access management concepts. This may require additional time and expertise.
  • Resource-Intensive
    Running Keycloak can be resource-intensive, requiring more CPU and memory compared to simpler authentication solutions. This may necessitate higher infrastructure costs.
  • Learning Curve
    The learning curve for Keycloak can be steep for new users due to its wide range of features and configuration options. Ample time might be required to fully understand and utilize its capabilities.
  • Documentation Quality
    While Keycloak has extensive documentation, some users find it to be insufficiently detailed or difficult to navigate, which can impede the setup and troubleshooting process.
  • Maintenance
    Operating a Keycloak instance involves ongoing maintenance tasks such as updates, security patches, and backups, which can be time-consuming and require dedicated resources.

Ping-API features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Ping-API provides a user-friendly interface that makes setting up API monitoring quick and straightforward, even for users with limited technical expertise.
  • Comprehensive Monitoring
    Offers detailed monitoring capabilities that can track API uptime, response times, and performance metrics, ensuring that users get a clear picture of their API's health.
  • Customization
    Allows users to customize alert settings and notifications, giving them control over how they receive updates and information about their API's status.
  • Integration
    Seamlessly integrates with other tools and services, allowing users to incorporate API monitoring into their existing workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Ping-API

  • Pricing
    The service can be costly, especially for small businesses or individual developers, as the pricing model may not be as flexible for varied usage levels.
  • Limited Free Tier
    The free tier offers limited features, which might not be sufficient for more demanding monitoring requirements.
  • Complexity for Advanced Features
    Users looking to use advanced features may face a steep learning curve, as these features could require more technical knowledge to implement effectively.
  • Support Responsiveness
    Some users have reported slower response times from customer support, which could delay issue resolution when encountering problems.

Analysis of Keycloak

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Keycloak is widely regarded as a good choice for organizations looking for a comprehensive and flexible identity management solution. It is especially praised in environments where open-source software is preferred or where customization and scalability are important.

Why this product is good

  • Keycloak is considered a robust open-source identity and access management solution that provides features like single sign-on (SSO), user federation, identity brokering, and social login. It is designed to secure applications and services with minimum effort and supports various standard protocols, such as OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, and SAML 2.0. It also offers a customizable interface and extensive integration capabilities, making it a versatile choice across different industries.

Recommended for

  • Organizations in need of a scalable identity and access management solution
  • Developers seeking an open-source, customizable platform
  • Businesses looking to implement SSO and secure applications quickly
  • Enterprises requiring integration with various identity providers and social media networks
  • Teams preferring a solution that supports industry-standard authentication protocols

Keycloak videos

+ Add

What is Keycloak and what are the main features | DevNation Live

More videos:

  • Review - Keycloak Overview
  • Review - Easily Secure Your Front and Back End app with Keycloak

Ping-API videos

No Ping-API videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Keycloak and Ping-API)

Keycloak

Ping-API

Identity And Access Management
100 100%
Identity And Access Management
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
Identity Provider
100 100%
Identity Provider
0% 0
Tech
0 0%
Tech
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Keycloak and Ping-API. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Keycloak and Ping-API

Keycloak Reviews

12 User Authentication Platforms [Auth0, Firebase Alternatives]
You can integrate Keycloak with your applications to have a single-sign-in and single-sign-out experience. Moreover, one can activate social logins without any modification in code. Additionally, it allows user authentication via existing OpenID Connect or SAML 2.0
Source: geekflare.com
10+ Open-source Single-Sign On (SSO) Solutions
Keycloak is a free, open-source identity and access management system with highly configurable Single-Sign-On (SSO) support.
Source: medevel.com
10 Best Auth0 Alternatives and Similar Platforms
Keycloak may be quite beneficial because it provides a built-in method for syncing with databases, such as LDAP or Active Directory, when your users already are registered on. If you use Social Login for social platforms such as Facebook, Keycloak might be a great tool for your organization.
Source: www.regendus.com
Top 5 Open Source Single Sign-On Software In the Year 2021
KeyCloak is another free software that is based on OpenID Connect, OAuth2.0, and SAML2.0. It provides SSO capabilities across web applications and web services. Above all, this open source software provides integrations with LDAP and Active Directory. There is a logical user interface where users can manage roles, permissions, and sessions. Moreover, this free solution...
Source: blog.containerize.com
IAM: A comparison of open-source tools
/ Digitalberry news / IAM: A comparison of open-source toolsIAM: A comparison of open-source toolsWhy use an Identity Provider (IdP)?Comparative study of Identity Providers (IdP)1. Our teamโ€™s first choice: Keycloak2. In second place of our comparative study: Gluu3. Special mention: FusionAuthDiscover our expertiseContact our experts
Source: www.digitalberry.fr

Ping-API Reviews

15 BEST SoapUI Alternatives (2022 Update)
Ping-API is API testing allows to write test script in JavaScript and CoffeeScript to test your APIs. It allows inspecting HTTP API call with a complete request and response data. For any failures, the user gets a notification through email, slack or Hipchat.
Source: www.guru99.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Keycloak seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Keycloak mentions (4)

  • Beyond the login page
    Most of the time nowadays, I prefer offloading this to an identity provider, using OpenID Connect or soon Federated Credential Management (FedCM), even if that means shipping an identity provider as part of the deliverables (I generally go with Keycloak, with keycloak-config-cli to provision its configuration). I'm obviously biased though as I work in IT services, developping software mainly for... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Okta Says Hackers Stole Data for All Customer Support Users
    Yet another breach of Okta... Why are companies not running something like keycloak [1] themselves? Are administrative/maintenance costs too high or is it plausible deniability? [1] https://keycloak.org. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • I built a ready-to-use auth server with TypeScript and Express.js
    I'd stick with a solution like https://keycloak.org in that instance. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Authelia is an open-source authentication/authorization server with 2FA/SSO
    A few more projects in this space: - Keycloak (you won't get fired for picking this)[0] - CloudFoundry's UAA[1] - Gluu [2] - Keratin [3] - OpenUnison [4] - Dex[5] - Netlify's GoTrue[6] All of these solutions are a bit different but here are some of the axes: - Whether or not they function as an OAuth provider - Whether they're centered around application-user-login (email + password) or application auth (OAuth) or... - Source: Hacker News / over 5 years ago

Ping-API mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Ping-API yet. Tracking of Ping-API recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Keycloak and Ping-API, you can also consider the following products

Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.

Strapi - Manage any content. Anywhere. The leading open-source headless CMS. 100% JavaScript / TypeScript and fully customizable.

OneLogin - On-demand SSO, directory integration, user provisioning and more

Runscope - Log, monitor and measure your API usage to solve API problems fast.

AuthAnvil - AuthAnvil software is an integrated identity and access management tool designed to help IT managers service their networks, infrastructure network, and ensure that devices are safe and secure at all times. Read more about AuthAnvil.

HTTPie for Terminal - Developers all around the world rely on HTTPie for API testing.

Loading...