Software Alternatives & Startups

Kap VS PuTTY

Compare Kap VS PuTTY and see what are their differences

Kap

Kap is an open-source screen recorder built with web technology.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
PuTTY

Popular free terminal application. Mostly used as an SSH client.

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Kap seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 39 times since March 2021.

social mentions
39 vs 0
Screen Recording popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
232 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Kap
PuTTY
Website getkap.co chiark.greenend.org.uk
Pricing
Open source
—
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Kap 6 features
PuTTY 5 features
  • Open Source
    Kap is an open-source project, meaning its code is freely available for users to inspect, modify, and enhance. This encourages community contributions and transparency.
  • Ease of Use
    Kap provides a simple and intuitive interface that makes screen recording easy, even for users who aren't very tech-savvy.
  • Customization
    Kap offers a variety of customizable settings and options, allowing users to tailor the screen recording experience to their specific needs.
  • Export Options
    Kap supports multiple export formats including GIF, MP4, WebM, and APNG, providing flexibility in how recordings can be used or shared.
  • Plugin Support
    Kap's functionality can be extended through a wide array of plugins, enabling users to add additional features and integrations.
  • Cross-Platform
    Kap is available for macOS, and while primarily developed for macOS, it's possible to run it on other OS using tools like Homebrew.

Possible disadvantages

  • Performance Overhead
    Screen recording can be resource-intensive, potentially affecting the performance of other applications running simultaneously.
  • Limited to macOS
    Kap is primarily designed for macOS, which limits its native usability for users on Windows or Linux platforms.
  • Feature Limitations
    While Kap is great for basic screen recording, it may lack advanced features found in other professional screen recording tools, such as detailed video editing capabilities.
  • Learning Curve for Plugins
    Although the plugin system adds versatility, it may require some time for users to find, install, and learn to use the right plugins effectively.
  • File Size
    The files generated can be quite large, especially for high-resolution recordings, which may be a concern for storage and sharing.
  • Free and Open Source
    PuTTY is free to use and its source code is openly available. This allows flexibility for users to modify it according to their needs and ensures that there are no licensing costs associated with its usage.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    PuTTY supports various network protocols including SSH, Telnet, SCP, and SFTP. This makes it versatile for different types of server management and data transfer tasks.
  • Lightweight
    PuTTY is a lightweight application that consumes minimal system resources, making it suitable for use on older or less powerful systems without significant performance degradation.
  • Extensible Configuration Options
    PuTTY offers a wide range of configuration options for terminal emulation, keyboard mappings, and connection settings, giving users fine control over their connections and workflow.
  • Portability
    PuTTY can be run as a portable application from USB drives or other external storage devices without the need for a formal installation process on the host system.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Integrated File Manager
    Unlike some other SSH clients, PuTTY does not come with an integrated file manager, which can make tasks involving file transfers less convenient without the use of PuTTY's separate utilities like PSCP or WinSCP.
  • Limited Scripting Capabilities
    PuTTY itself lacks advanced scripting capabilities which can be a limitation for users who need to automate sessions or workflows extensively. External tools or extensions are necessary for these needs.
  • Basic User Interface
    The user interface of PuTTY is quite basic compared to modern applications. It lacks some of the polished features and aesthetics that other terminal clients might offer.
  • No Tabbed Sessions
    PuTTY does not natively support multiple tabbed sessions within a single window, which can make managing multiple connections less convenient. Users typically need to open multiple instances of the application.
  • Windows-Centric
    While PuTTY is primarily developed for Windows, its cross-platform capabilities through ports like PuTTY for Mac or Linux are not as well-supported, leading to potential inconsistencies and lack of features compared to the Windows version.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Kap
PuTTY

Overall verdict

  • Kap is considered a solid choice for anyone looking for an easy-to-use, efficient, and free screen recording tool on macOS. It balances simplicity with functionality, making it suitable for a wide range of users.

Why this product is good

  • Kap is a screen recording tool designed for macOS, known for its simplicity and open-source nature. It allows users to quickly capture their screens with ease, supporting a variety of formats and offering different customization options. The app provides additional flexibility through plugins, making it adaptable to specific needs. Being open-source also means that it is continually improved by contributions from the developer community, which keeps the tool up-to-date with users' needs.

Recommended for

    Kap is highly recommended for macOS users who need a straightforward screen recording solution. It is particularly beneficial for content creators, educators, and developers who require quick screen captures without the complexity of more advanced applications.

Overall verdict

  • Yes, PuTTY is generally regarded as a good choice for those needing an SSH client on Windows. Its robustness and long-standing reputation in the industry contribute positively to its assessment.

Why this product is good

  • PuTTY is a popular and widely used SSH client for Windows due to its light weight, ease of use, and reliability. It is open-source, supports various network protocols like SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin, and has been maintained and updated consistently over the years. The software's configurability and ability to store session configurations make it a versatile choice for both beginners and advanced users.

Recommended for

    PuTTY is recommended for system administrators, developers, network engineers, and anyone who needs to perform remote command-line operations on a computer or server using the SSH protocol. It is particularly useful for users who are working on Windows systems.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Kap 3 videos + Add
PuTTY 3 videos + Add

OrganiCup - Adet Kabı, Menstrual Kap

More videos

  • - ✩Review: Kap Creations Resin Molds
  • - Test Kap och Gersåg - Review Mitre saw Metabo KGS 216 + stand KSU 251, (eng. subtitles)

MASSIVE STORE PUTTY REVIEW!

More videos

  • - MOST EXPENSIVE STORE PUTTY + MORE!
  • - STORE BOUGHT SLIME & PUTTY REVIEW, MIXING ALL MY SLIME !! SLIME SMOOTHIE | SATISFYING SLIME VIDEO 32

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Kap
PuTTY
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
SSH
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Kap and PuTTY. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Kap no reviews yet
PuTTY no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Kap yet. Be the first one to post

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Kap 39 mentions
PuTTY 0 mentions
  • QuickRecorder(macOS): open-source, lightweight, high-performance screen recorder
    This works great and is replacing Kap[1] for me. [1] https://getkap.co/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Show HN: I made an open-source Loom alternative
    How about with a K instead https://getkap.co/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Show HN: Cap – open-source alternative to Loom
    I thought it was Kap for a moment https://getkap.co/ similar name, similar product (but that one is ready to use). Also a bit confused as it seems there is nothing there besides an idea and a landing page. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

View more

Tracking PuTTY since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Kap and PuTTY

When comparing Kap and PuTTY, you can also consider the following products.

  • Loom

    Loom is a screen recording extension for Chrome that gives people the ability to create and share media. Create your own videos using your camera, screen view, and audio. Read more about Loom.

    Compare Loom to Kap or PuTTY:

  • MobaXterm

    Enhanced terminal for Windows with X11 server, tabbed SSH client, network tools and much more

    Compare MobaXterm to Kap or PuTTY:

  • Screenity

    The most powerful screen recorder & annotation tool for Chrome 🎥 - GitHub - alyssaxuu/screenity: The most powerful screen recorder & annotation tool for Chrome 🎥

    Compare Screenity to Kap or PuTTY:

  • KiTTY

    KiTTY is a fork from version 0.70 of PuTTY. It adds extra features to PuTTY.

    Compare KiTTY to Kap or PuTTY:

  • Tella

    Capture your best work with video. Record in the browser, share instantly.

    Compare Tella to Kap or PuTTY:

  • ConEmu

    ConEmu-Maximus5 is a full-featured local terminal for Windows devs, admins and users. Get better console window with tabs, splits, Quake style, copy+paste, DosBox and PuTTY integration, and much more.

    Compare ConEmu to Kap or PuTTY: