Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

JUST VS Dhall Configuration Language

Compare JUST VS Dhall Configuration Language and see what are their differences

happySEO
Create ai humanized SEO content tailored for ecommerce and small businesses with HappySEO tools. From ai writer to keyword research and analyze tools. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

JUST logo JUST

Service to find a job in sports and eSports.

Dhall Configuration Language logo Dhall Configuration Language

A non-repetitive alternative to YAML
  • JUST Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-06
  • Dhall Configuration Language Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-27

JUST features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Dhall Configuration Language features and specs

  • Deterministic
    Dhall is designed to be a deterministic configuration language, meaning that given the same input, it will always produce the same output. This ensures consistency and repeatability across environments.
  • Type-Safe
    Dhall includes a strong static type system, preventing many common errors associated with misconfigurations. Types are checked at compile time, ensuring configuration values meet specific criteria before deployment.
  • Total Programming Language
    Unlike many other configuration languages, Dhall is a total functional programming language, which means every program written in Dhall will terminate. This prevents infinite loops and other runtime issues.
  • Interoperability
    Dhall can generate JSON, YAML, and other data interchange formats, making it highly interoperable with existing systems that require these formats for configuration.
  • Modular
    Dhall allows for modular configuration files. You can define reusable components and import them across different configurations, promoting DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles.

Possible disadvantages of Dhall Configuration Language

  • Learning Curve
    While Dhall is designed to be simple, the presence of a type system and functional programming concepts can present a learning curve to new users, especially those without a programming background.
  • Tooling Support
    Compared to more established languages, Dhall has less tooling support. Users might find fewer IDE extensions, plugins, or community libraries to assist in development.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    Being relatively new, Dhall has a smaller ecosystem that may lack the breadth of community contributions, such as templates and integration examples, found in more mature configuration languages.
  • Performance Overhead
    The type checking and interpretation of Dhall can introduce some performance overhead compared to more traditional configuration formats like JSON or YAML, which are simpler to parse.
  • Complexity for Simple Configurations
    For simple configurations, the added complexity of Dhall's type system and functional features may be unnecessary, leading to overhead without a clear benefit.

JUST videos

+ Add

Hogwarts Legacy Just DESTROYED Every Hater with THIS Tweet

More videos:

  • Review - Hogwarts Legacy Just Got An Absolutely Bizarre New Update
  • Review - JUST ANNOUNCED 2023 Sony ES Home Theater Receivers Overview/Review | 📣 THE WAIT IS OVER! 📣

Dhall Configuration Language videos

No Dhall Configuration Language videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JUST and Dhall Configuration Language)

JUST

Dhall Configuration Language

Web Application Bundler
100 100%
Web Application Bundler
0% 0
Configuration Management
0 0%
Configuration Management
100% 100
Esports
100 100%
Esports
0% 0
Software Development
0 0%
Software Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using JUST and Dhall Configuration Language. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Dhall Configuration Language seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 93 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JUST mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of JUST yet. Tracking of JUST recommendations started around Jul 2021.

Dhall Configuration Language mentions (93)

  • Dear GitHub: no YAML anchors, please
    There are languages specifically for writing configs. Like dhall https://dhall-lang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 days ago
  • Microsoft POML – Prompt Orchestration Markup Language
    > I'm thinking what is the missing piece here First, it's cool that you work on it. Creating a new language is not an easy task. I would suggest to try to stand on the shoulders of giants instead of trying to come up with a completely new thing. Have a look at dhall: https://dhall-lang.org/ - it is a language that was created for cases like yours. Or, if you want to make POML a fully fledged language (and turing... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Any program can be a GitHub Actions shell
    I'll give a shot at some guiding principals: 1. Do not use yaml. All github action logic should be written in a language that compiles to yaml, for example dhall (https://dhall-lang.org/). Yaml is an awful language for programmers, and it's a worse language for non-programmers. It's good for no one. 2. To the greatest extent possible, do not use any actions which install things. For example, don't use... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • StrictYAML
    I'm a fan of anything that moves us away from stringly typed nonsense. See also Dhall (which can render to yaml). I like the idea but found the veneer broke a little too often and left me squinting at Haskell. https://dhall-lang.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Some Programming Language Ideas
    I think you're asking for Starlark (https://starlark-lang.org), a language that strongly resembles Python but isn't Turing-complete, originally designed at Google for use in their build system. There's also Dhall (https://dhall-lang.org), which targets configuration use cases; I'm less familiar with it. One problem is that, while non-Turing-completeness can be helpful for maintainability, it's not really... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JUST and Dhall Configuration Language, you can also consider the following products

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

Jsonnet - A powerful DSL for elegant description of JSON data.

Laravel Elixir - Application and Data, Build, Test, Deploy, and JS Build Tools / JS Task Runners

YAML - YAML 1.2 --- YAML: YAML Ain't Markup Language

Turbolinks - Turbolinks makes navigating your web application faster

TOML - TOML - Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language

Loading...