Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

jQuery VS Movable Type

Compare jQuery VS Movable Type and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

jQuery logo jQuery

The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

Movable Type logo Movable Type

Build your website with the powerful content management system Movable Type. Our blogging software and static publishing platform makes site management easy and effective.
  • jQuery Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-22
  • Movable Type Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-17

jQuery features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    jQuery simplifies complex JavaScript tasks by providing easy-to-use methods, which can lead to shorter development times and cleaner code.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    jQuery handles many browser inconsistencies, ensuring that your code works seamlessly across different browsers without additional effort.
  • Large Community and Ecosystem
    There is a vast community of developers who contribute plugins, extensions, and provide support, making it easier to find solutions and enhance functionality.
  • Animation and Effects
    jQuery offers built-in methods for creating animations and effects, allowing developers to enhance the user interface with minimal code.
  • AJAX Simplification
    The library provides straightforward methods for making AJAX calls, which simplifies the process of loading data asynchronously.
  • Documentation and Learning Resources
    Extensive documentation and a plethora of tutorials are available, making it easier for developers to learn and troubleshoot.

Possible disadvantages of jQuery

  • Performance Overhead
    Using jQuery can add overhead to your application due to its file size and additional abstraction, which can impact performance, especially in resource-constrained environments.
  • Relevance
    With the advent of modern JavaScript frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular, and the improvements in native JavaScript (ES6+), the need for jQuery has decreased, making it less relevant in contemporary web development.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic usage is straightforward, mastering more advanced topics and optimizing performance can be challenging for newcomers.
  • Potential for Overuse
    Developers might rely too heavily on jQuery for tasks that can be efficiently handled by native JavaScript, leading to bloated codebases.
  • Maintenance and Legacy Code
    Projects heavily reliant on jQuery may face maintenance challenges as modern frameworks and practices evolve, requiring significant refactoring effort if transitioning away from jQuery.
  • Security
    Older jQuery versions have known security vulnerabilities, and continuing to use outdated versions can pose security risks. Regular updates are necessary to mitigate this issue.

Movable Type features and specs

  • Flexibility
    Movable Type provides a high level of customization and flexibility, allowing users to extensively modify and configure their websites to meet specific needs.
  • Static Site Generation
    The platform can generate static HTML pages, which typically leads to faster load times and reduced server loads compared to dynamic pages.
  • Robust Publishing Features
    Movable Type offers strong content management capabilities, including scheduling posts, categorization, and user roles, making it suitable for professional bloggers and businesses.
  • Security
    As a more mature platform, Movable Type is known for its strong security framework, which helps protect sites from many common vulnerabilities.

Possible disadvantages of Movable Type

  • Complexity
    The platform can be challenging for beginners due to its extensive features and the technical knowledge required for more advanced customization.
  • Cost
    Unlike many other CMS platforms, Movable Type is not open-source and may require licensing fees, which could be prohibitive for small businesses or individuals.
  • Smaller Community
    Movable Type has a smaller user and developer community compared to competitors like WordPress, potentially resulting in fewer plugins and themes, and limited community-based support.
  • Less Frequent Updates
    The platform does not receive updates and enhancements as frequently as some other CMSs, which might result in slower adoption of new technologies and features.

Analysis of jQuery

Overall verdict

  • jQuery is good for simplifying and speeding up certain JavaScript tasks, particularly in projects that need to support older browsers or if you are maintaining legacy code. However, for modern web development, many of its features are now part of the JavaScript standard, diminishing its necessity.

Why this product is good

  • jQuery has been popular due to its simplicity and ease of use, providing an easier way to work with HTML document traversal, event handling, and animations. It abstracts browser differences and offers a concise API for common JavaScript operations.

Recommended for

  • Developers maintaining or updating legacy projects that already use jQuery.
  • Projects that require compatibility with older browsers not supported by modern JavaScript features.
  • Beginners learning JavaScript concepts as an additional tool to practice DOM manipulation and event handling.

jQuery videos

Quick jQuery Review

More videos:

  • Review - jQuery vs Vue, React and Angular
  • Review - Front-End Development, HTML & CSS, Javascript & jQuery by Jon Duckett | Book Review
  • Review - The Legend of jQuery in 100 Seconds
  • Review - โญ•The one book I regret not having as a beginning web developer || Jon Duckett JavaScript & jQuery

Movable Type videos

Movable Type Review with Sam Healey

More videos:

  • Review - Edo's Movable Type Review
  • Review - Movable Type Review - with Jason from The Boardgame Mechanics

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to jQuery and Movable Type)
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Diagnostics Software
0 0%
100% 100
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using jQuery and Movable Type. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare jQuery and Movable Type

jQuery Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
jQuery dramatically simplifies JS programming and is easy to learn and use. It is highly extensible and makes web pages load faster. jQuery wraps up a lot of standard functions making the job of the developer easy. A JS code of several lines could be just a method to be called in jQuery. It also has many plugins to perform different tasks. Some of the features of jQuery are...
Source: hackr.io
Top 15 jQuery Alternatives To Know
The world is full of newer technologies and there are alternatives available for all of them. jQuery is no different. The above-mentioned technologies can be a good alternative to jQuery though jQuery itself has a loyal user base of its own. Overall, it depends upon the organizational skills, requirements, budget, and objective, based on which stakeholders can take a call on...
Best Javascript libraries to use in 2021
jQuery has been in the development scene for a long time and has been the unprecedented king for webpage dev. It is one of the most common libraries used throughout the world, with more than 50% of websites using jQuery for their functioning. jQuery is a library used majorly for Document Object Model (DOM) manipulation. The DOM is a tree-like structure that represents all...
Source: codersera.com

Movable Type Reviews

We have no reviews of Movable Type yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, jQuery seems to be a lot more popular than Movable Type. While we know about 103 links to jQuery, we've tracked only 1 mention of Movable Type. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

jQuery mentions (103)

  • The Ultimate Guide to AJAX
    jQuery simplified AJAX syntax dramatically, which is why it became so popular. If you're working with a project that already uses jQuery (like many WordPress themes and plugins), its AJAX methods are very convenient. - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago
  • The Unchaining: My Personal Journey Graduating from jQuery to Modern JavaScript
    When I was building a quick frontend to the LLM game, I used jQuery to quickly whip out a prototype. Only after I was happy with it, I ported the code to the modern DOM API. As a result, I totally removed the dependency on jQuery. This whole experience makes me wonder, do people still use jQuery, in this age of frontend engineering? I took some time over the weekend to port one of my old jQuery plugins. This is... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • This One jQuery Mistake Froze Our Web Page! Here's the Fix You Need to Know
    Whenever the number of items increased, the browser became slow, sometimes even unresponsive. At first, we thought it was a server issue or maybe too much data. But no โ€” the problem was hiding inside a small line of jQuery. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Is jQuery Dead?
    Ah, jQuery โ€” the library that powered a generation of web apps. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Understanding Awaitables: Coroutines, Tasks, and Futures in Python
    Then we have callbacks, which were popularized by AJAX calls. Back then, with jQuery, we could define handlers to deal with both success or failure cases. For instance, let's say we want to fetch the HTML markup of this blog (skipping error failure callback for brevity), we do. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
View more

Movable Type mentions (1)

  • *HELP* Importing into Day One from Moveable Type?
    I need help.. I have a text file export from a [Movable Type](https://movabletype.org) blog/journal that I had in the early 2000's. The [file export](https://movabletype.org/documentation/appendices/import-export-format.html) is in the following type of format with multiple entries. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing jQuery and Movable Type, you can also consider the following products

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

Zing - The worry-freeinternational money app

Babel - Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.

pgAdmin - pgAdmin Website

OpenSSL - OpenSSL is a free and open source software cryptography library that implements both the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, which are primarily used to provide secure communications between web browsers and โ€ฆ

MxToolBox - All of your MX record, DNS, blacklist and SMTP diagnostics in one integrated tool.