jQuery UI VS Ember-cli

• Ease of Use
  jQuery UI simplifies creating and managing complex UI components with straightforward syntax and comprehensive documentation.
• Compatibility
  jQuery UI is highly compatible with older browsers, offering a broader range of support compared to more modern frameworks.
• Extensibility
  jQuery UI is designed to be modular and extendable, allowing developers to use only the components they need and easily extend or theming them.
• Rich Set of Widgets
  It comes with a variety of pre-built widgets such as datepickers, accordions, and sliders, which can save development time.
• Animated Effects
  jQuery UI includes many built-in animation effects that can enhance the user experience without requiring additional libraries.
• Theming
  The library provides Themeroller, a tool that allows developers to create custom themes easily, ensuring UI consistency and branding.

Possible disadvantages

• Performance
  Due to its extensive feature set, jQuery UI can be relatively heavy, which may affect performance, particularly in resource-constrained environments.
• Not Mobile-First
  jQuery UI is not designed with mobile-first principles in mind, making it less optimal for modern responsive web applications.
• Learning Curve
  While easy to use for simple tasks, mastering jQuery UI for more complex applications may require a significant learning curve.
• Dependency on jQuery
  Since jQuery UI relies on the jQuery library, it adds an additional dependency which can be limiting if you prefer or are required to use vanilla JS or another library.
• Declining Popularity
  With the rise of modern frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular, jQuery UI has seen a decline in popularity and community support.
• Limited Modern Features
  Compared to contemporary UI libraries, jQuery UI lacks some of the modern features and performance optimizations found in newer libraries.

• Convention over Configuration
  Ember-cli enforces strong conventions for file structure, naming, and project organization, which reduces decision fatigue and makes it easier for developers to jump between different Ember projects with minimal onboarding time.
• Built-in Tooling
  Comes with a robust set of built-in tools including a development server, testing framework integration (QUnit), asset compilation, and live reload, reducing the need to manually configure and integrate third-party build tools.
• Addon Ecosystem
  Ember-cli supports a rich ecosystem of addons that can be easily installed and integrated into projects, allowing developers to extend functionality without reinventing the wheel for common features.
• Blueprints and Generators
  Provides powerful generator commands (blueprints) that scaffold components, routes, models, and other application pieces quickly, speeding up development and ensuring consistency across the codebase.
• Stable Long-term Support
  Ember-cli follows Ember's release cycle with clear LTS (Long Term Support) versions, providing stability and predictability for teams maintaining large applications over time.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  The strict conventions and unique architecture of Ember-cli can be difficult for newcomers to learn, especially those coming from more flexible frameworks or with no prior Ember experience.
• Smaller Community Compared to Alternatives
  Compared to tools like Vite, Webpack, or CRA used with React/Vue, Ember-cli has a smaller community and ecosystem, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, and community-driven troubleshooting.
• Build Performance
  For large applications, Ember-cli's build process can become slow, and while improvements have been made with embroider, some developers still report slower build times compared to more modern bundlers.
• Rigid Structure
  The opinionated nature of Ember-cli, while helpful for consistency, can feel restrictive for developers who prefer more flexibility in structuring their applications or adopting non-standard patterns.
• Migration Complexity
  Upgrading between major Ember-cli versions or migrating to newer build systems like Embroider can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for older or heavily customized applications.

jQuery UI tutorial: Adding a user interface with jQuery UI | lynda.com

More videos

No Ember-cli videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Let Me Talk About Component-based Front-end Development

  The once popular jQuery, with its strengths fully utilized in jQuery UI and Bootstrap, provides many UI components and is also friendly to backend developers, seemingly meeting the requirements. However, looking at their component... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• 100+ Must-Have Web Development Resources

  jQuery UI: An open-source library for building user interfaces based on jQuery. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• What is a component library and should you build your own?

  Fortunately, when I started web development in earnest, many of these issues were ironed out. By this point, there were still a handful of libraries that made writing complex interfaces with cross-browser support a little easier. Jquery... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

View more

• Help! Why does chrome console inner text and my program inner text not return the same values? (spent nearly the whole day trying to extract an element). Turned to reddit as its always had the best community. Any help is MASSIVELY appreciated. Puppeteer!!

  The webpage is LinkedIn.com. While this isn’t a framework, I know that are using https://cli.emberjs.com/release/. Source: about 5 years ago