
fzf
HTTPie
jello
fx
Bat
fd
cURL
jq is like sed for JSON data - you can use it to slice and filter and map and transform structured...

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, jq seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 162 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | stedolan.github.io | codegres.org |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using jq and Codegres.org. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Therefore, if I have to choose one right now, I would probably go for Mustache, and a JSON processor such as jq as a glue if needed. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
I am lazy person, so I worked harder and wrote a small jq script to generate a list of rules to go into the select key in ruff.lint section:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
"jq is a lightweight and flexible command-line JSON processor" from the jq https://stedolan.github.io/jq/. - Source: dev.to / almost 5 years ago
Tracking Codegres.org since Nov 2022.
When comparing jq and Codegres.org, you can also consider the following products.