JournalX VS Leo Editor
Compare JournalX VS Leo Editor and see what are their differences
Email that sounds like you, and gets measurably more like you every week. Drafts in Gmail, Outlook, and the browser. Free to start.
featured
JournalX
TraderSync
Moodfol.io
Quantro
UltraTrader
Stonk Journal
Mantis Trading Journal
ProfitHelper.app
Leo Editor
PyScripter
Pyzo
Ecere SDK
iPython
NINJA-IDE
CodeMix
SciTE
JournalX is a trading journal for active, self-directed traders who want a real feedback loop on their performance. Log, plan, and analyze every trade in one workspace, then use your own data to work out what is working in your strategy and what is not.
Most journals are a record of what already happened. JournalX starts one step earlier. You write the plan before you take the trade (setup, entry, stop, target, size), take the trade, and the journal reconciles the plan against the execution. Over a few hundred trades, that gap between what you planned and what you did becomes the most useful data you have, and almost nothing else measures it.
Your strategy lives in the product as Gameplans: reusable entry and risk rules you define once, attach to trades, and review for adherence. Pair that with a filter builder that stacks conditions (setup, session, symbol, tag, win or loss) and you can answer a specific question instead of staring at one blended P&L number. An AI assistant works over your own trade history, so you can ask why a month went badly and get an answer grounded in your trades rather than a generic tip.
Trades arrive by broker auto-sync, CSV import with column mapping, or manual entry. Stocks, options, futures, forex, and crypto are all supported, with multi-account and multi-currency tracking.
JournalX Leo EditorNo JournalX videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
JournalX's answer
JournalX started from a problem most traders recognise. You keep a spreadsheet, it grows to forty columns, and at some point you quietly stop updating it. Even when you do keep it current, it tells you what your P&L was without telling you why.
The existing journals solved half of that. They import trades and produce charts. But they still only look backward, at decisions already made and no longer changeable. The idea behind JournalX was that the interesting data is the difference between the trade you planned and the trade you actually took. Capture the plan first and the journal can show you where discipline broke down, not just where money was lost.
So the product was built around that loop: plan, execute, reconcile, review. Everything else, the analytics, the Gameplans, the notes, the AI assistant, the broker sync, exists to make that loop fast enough to run every single day.
JournalX's answer
Most trading journals are a record of what already happened. JournalX starts one step earlier.
You write the plan before you take the trade: setup, entry, stop, target, position size. Then you take the trade, and the journal reconciles the plan against what you actually did. Over a few hundred trades, that gap between the trade you planned and the trade you took is usually where the real problem lives, and almost no other journal measures it.
JournalX's answer
Three reasons.
Pre-trade planning. TradeZella, TraderSync, Tradervue, and Edgewonk are all capable at post-trade analysis. None of them ask you to commit to a plan before entry and then score you against it. That is the habit that actually changes behaviour, and it is what JournalX is built around.
Speed and interface. A journal only works if you use it every day. JournalX is fast, navigable from the keyboard through a command palette, and designed so a daily review takes minutes rather than becoming the chore you skip.
Price and coverage. Starter is $24/mo, or $19/mo billed annually. Pro is $49/mo, or $29/mo billed annually. Stocks, options, futures, forex, and crypto are supported at every tier, with broker auto-sync, CSV import, and manual entry, and there is a 7-day free trial.
JournalX's answer
Active, self-directed retail traders who treat trading as a craft and want a real feedback loop on their performance. That spans day and swing traders, and futures, options, forex, and crypto traders across global markets.
Based on our record, Leo Editor seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
What are your experiences with literate programming for handover of code? I am thinking of tools like noweb (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noweb), LEO (http://leoeditor.com/) org-mode (http://cachestocaches.com/2018/6/org-literate-programming/), scribble/lp2 (https://docs.racket-lang.org/scribble/lp.html#%28part._scribble_lp2_.Language%29), My experience so far is that it can be a fantastic tool for documenting... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
I know what folding is, that's just not what I want. I want to completely hide everything that is not related to the current function. For a while, I used http://leoeditor.com/ where I could have every function/method as a node in a tree, with the node body containing just that. Looking for a way to achieve the same in vim if possible. Source: almost 4 years ago
The lack of good node/graph based APIs for Org Mode is my beef as well. When you compare it with the APIs of the Leo Editor[1], Org pales in comparison. Manipulation that is trivial in the Leo Editor can be quite a pain in Org mode. [1] https://leoeditor.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
> What outliners do you know which allow end-users to feed their data into formulas for processing it without using general-purpose programming languages? Bit of a pointless constraint, the talk is about outliners, not no-code-datamangment. Which tool today does this even offer on a useful level? But you can look at leo editor (https://leoeditor.com), which is active for 20+ years, fully scriptable and extendable.... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
Leo is a pretty amazing project: Edward K. Ream treats it as his life's work, it seems to me, and his energy on the mailing lists, constantly thinking in public, is an inspiration. https://leoeditor.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
TraderSync - Biometric trading journal to trade without emotion
PyScripter - PyScripter is a free and open-source Python Integrated Development Environment (IDE) created with...
Moodfol.io - Moodfol.io is the fastest trading journal that helps you log trades, tag emotions and strategies, and uncover the patterns behind your performance - so you can trade with discipline and clarity.
Pyzo - Pyzo is a cross-platform Python IDE focused on interactivity and introspection, which makes it very...
Quantro - Track trades.
Ecere SDK - A cross-platform Software Development Kit including a GUI toolkit, a 2D/3D graphics engine, a...