Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Journal Publishing UK VS ShellNewHandler

Compare Journal Publishing UK VS ShellNewHandler and see what are their differences

Journal Publishing UK

Publish your research paper in reputed journals. Journal Publishers UK helps scholars and researchers with journal paper submission, editing, and publishing.

Rating
0 reviews
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
ShellNewHandler

SourceForge.net: ShellNewHandler details page

Rating
0 reviews
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
Rclone UI
The cross-platform GUI for Rclone. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, ShellNewHandler seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 2
Publishing popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Journal Publishing UK
ShellNewHandler
Website journalpublishers.co.uk sourceforge.net
Listed in
Publishing Web Digital Publishing Blogging +1
Cloud Storage Monitoring Tools File Sharing Website Monitoring +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Journal Publishing UK 5 features
ShellNewHandler 0 features
  • Open Access Publishing
    Journal Publishing UK offers open access publishing options, making research freely available to readers worldwide without subscription barriers, which can increase the visibility and impact of published work.
  • Rapid Publication Process
    The publisher advertises a relatively fast peer review and publication process, which can be beneficial for researchers who need their work published in a timely manner.
  • Range of Disciplines
    Journal Publishing UK covers multiple academic disciplines and subject areas, providing opportunities for researchers from various fields to submit and publish their work.
  • Online Accessibility
    Published articles are made available online, ensuring easy digital access for readers and researchers around the globe, which can help with dissemination of research findings.
  • Low Publication Fees
    Compared to some major established publishers, Journal Publishing UK may offer relatively lower article processing charges, making it more accessible for researchers with limited funding.

Possible disadvantages

  • Questionable Reputation
    Journal Publishing UK is not widely recognized among established academic publishers and has been flagged by some researchers and watchlists as a potentially predatory or low-quality publisher, raising concerns about credibility.
  • Limited Indexing
    Journals published by this publisher may not be indexed in major reputable databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, or PubMed, which can significantly reduce the visibility and academic value of published research.
  • Uncertain Peer Review Quality
    There are concerns about the rigor and thoroughness of the peer review process, with some researchers questioning whether submissions undergo genuine and robust scholarly evaluation before acceptance.
  • Low Impact Factor and Recognition
    Publications in these journals may not carry significant weight in academic evaluations, tenure reviews, or grant applications due to the lack of established impact factors and limited recognition in the academic community.
  • Aggressive Solicitation Emails
    Researchers have reported receiving unsolicited bulk emails from this publisher inviting manuscript submissions, which is a common characteristic associated with predatory publishing practices and raises red flags about their legitimacy.

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Journal Publishing UK
ShellNewHandler

Overall verdict

  • I don't have verified, reliable information about journalpublishers.co.uk to confirm its legitimacy, quality, or reputation, so I cannot responsibly endorse or condemn this specific service without independent research.

Why this product is good

  • No verified data available on this specific domain's track record, peer-review standards, or indexing status
  • Academic publishing has many predatory or low-quality outlets mimicking legitimate publishers, so caution is warranted
  • Legitimacy typically depends on factors like editorial board credentials, indexing in databases (Scopus, Web of Science), transparent fee structures, and genuine peer review—these need direct verification
  • Checking resources like Think.Check.Submit, DOAJ, or Beall's list-successor sites, and contacting current authors would provide better insight than assumptions

Recommended for

  • Researchers should independently verify the publisher's indexing, editorial board, and peer-review process before submitting work
  • Authors seeking reputable venues for career-critical publications should cross-check with established directories like DOAJ or Scopus
  • Anyone considering this service should look for reviews from actual published authors and check if the journal is recognized in their specific academic field
  • Not recommended to proceed without due diligence given the lack of verifiable public information

Overall verdict

  • ShellNewHandler is a niche, lightweight utility hosted on SourceForge designed to give users more control over the Windows 'New' context menu (the ShellNew menu). It can be considered good for its specific narrow use case, but it is an older, minimally maintained tool that may not suit all users, especially those on modern Windows versions.

Why this product is good

  • Provides direct control over customizing the Windows right-click 'New' menu, allowing users to add or remove file type entries
  • Lightweight and free, without bundled bloatware typical of some other free utilities
  • Simple and focused in scope, making it easy to understand for its specific purpose
  • Open distribution via SourceForge allows transparency and no-cost access

Recommended for

  • Power users who want to declutter or customize the Windows New context menu
  • IT administrators managing standardized desktop environments across multiple machines
  • Users comfortable with older utility-style tools and Windows registry-related tweaks
  • Not recommended for casual users seeking modern, actively supported software with regular updates

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Journal Publishing UK
ShellNewHandler
100% 100%
Publishing
0% 0%
0% 0%
File Sharing
100% 100%
100% 100%
Digital Publishing
0% 0%
0% 0%
Cloud Storage
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Journal Publishing UK and ShellNewHandler. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Journal Publishing UK 0 mentions
ShellNewHandler 2 mentions

Tracking Journal Publishing UK since Apr 2026.

  • I recently got libreoffice, but now the new option in right click looks like a mess. Can someone help me get rid of them please?
    Use Shell New Handler. Run the portable app and simply untick the items you don't want to appear in your new context menu. Source: about 4 years ago
  • This menu should be easy to add/remove programs to... Who is really creating Access Databases from this menu often enough to keep it here? (Not me!) Is there an easy way to edit this?
    I've always used ShellNewHandler for this. It's a really simple portable utility that allows you to remove most of the items from that menu. Tested it out on Windows 11 and it's still compatible. Source: over 5 years ago

Alternatives to Journal Publishing UK and ShellNewHandler

When comparing Journal Publishing UK and ShellNewHandler, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...