Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Jotti VS socketify.py

Compare Jotti VS socketify.py and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Jotti logo Jotti

Jottis malware scan is a free online service that enables you to scan suspicious files with several...

socketify.py logo socketify.py

Maybe the fastest web framework for Python and PyPy
  • Jotti Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-01
  • socketify.py Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-24

Jotti features and specs

  • Multiple Antivirus Engines
    Jotti uses multiple antivirus engines to scan files, increasing the likelihood of detection for various malware by leveraging different heuristics and databases.
  • Free Service
    The service is available for free, allowing users to scan files without incurring any costs.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Jotti provides a straightforward and easy-to-use interface, making it accessible for most users.
  • No Installation Required
    As an online tool, it doesn't require any software installation, making it convenient for users concerned about downloading additional applications.

Possible disadvantages of Jotti

  • File Size Limitations
    Jotti has a limitation on the size of files that can be uploaded, which may be restrictive for users needing to scan larger files.
  • Limited to Single Files
    Users can only scan one file at a time, which can be time-consuming if there are multiple files to check.
  • Potential Privacy Concerns
    Since files are uploaded to an online server for scanning, there could be privacy and confidentiality concerns depending on the nature of the data.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    Being an online service, Jotti requires a stable internet connection, which may be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity.

socketify.py features and specs

  • High Performance
    Socketify.py is designed for high scalability and performance, leveraging an efficient event loop and native extensions to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently.
  • WebSocket Support
    The library provides built-in support for WebSockets, making it suitable for real-time applications where persistent connections between client and server are necessary.
  • Asynchronous I/O
    Socketify.py is built on top of asynchronous I/O paradigms, allowing non-blocking operations that can improve the throughput of networked applications.
  • Ease of Use
    The library offers a clean and straightforward API with examples and documentation, which lowers the barrier to entry for developers who are new to network programming in Python.
  • Python Integration
    Being a Python library, socketify.py integrates well with existing Python applications and can be included as part of larger, multi-component systems.

Possible disadvantages of socketify.py

  • Limited Adoption
    As a relatively new or niche library, socketify.py might have a smaller user base and community compared to more established frameworks like Flask or Django, which could result in fewer community resources and third-party integrations.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers who are accustomed to synchronous programming paradigms, adapting to the asynchronous programming model of socketify.py may require an initial learning investment.
  • Documentation Depth
    While there is documentation, it might not be as extensive or comprehensive as those of more mature libraries, potentially requiring more experimentation or source code reading to fully grasp advanced features.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    Being less established, there might be undiscovered bugs or stability issues in production environments compared to long-standing Python networking libraries.
  • Ecosystem Limitations
    The library might lack some of the extensive third-party plugins or tools available in more popular frameworks, which could limit its extensibility.

Analysis of socketify.py

Overall verdict

  • Socketify.py is a solid choice for developers seeking a high-performance web framework in Python, particularly for I/O-bound applications requiring speed comparable to frameworks in compiled languages, thanks to its use of uWebSockets under the hood.

Why this product is good

  • Built on uWebSockets, providing significant performance improvements over traditional Python web frameworks
  • Supports WebSockets natively, making it suitable for real-time applications
  • Lightweight and minimalistic design reduces overhead
  • Compatible with ASGI, allowing integration with existing Python async ecosystem
  • Active development and growing community support on GitHub
  • Good for building high-throughput APIs and services

Recommended for

  • Developers building real-time applications like chat apps or live notifications
  • Projects requiring high concurrency and low latency in Python
  • Teams looking to replace slower WSGI-based frameworks with something faster
  • Applications needing WebSocket support without heavy framework overhead
  • Microservices architectures where performance is critical
  • Python developers wanting an alternative to Node.js for performance-sensitive tasks

Jotti videos

Jotti Malware Scan

socketify.py videos

No socketify.py videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Jotti and socketify.py)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Python
0 0%
100% 100
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0
Web Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Jotti and socketify.py. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Jotti should be more popular than socketify.py. It has been mentiond 13 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Jotti mentions (13)

  • Might have gotten a virus from Dodi repacks.
    Everyone of you "pirates" should be using a image of your hard-drive to restore from. This should have been done after your windows installation, updates, drivers, OS tweaks, etc. You use the free version of Macrium Reflect, you use the "make a boot thumb drive" option with the software and it will automatically partition the USB drive for you and on the non-boot partition, you stick the image. Anytime you think... Source: over 3 years ago
  • How to not get a computer virus?
    Anything you execute, including installers, run through VirusTotal, Jotti AntiVirus, or my personal favorite: ShieldPro. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Areowitter V3.0, false positives? What do you think?
    Just scanned the apk on https://virusscan.jotti.org which also uses Ikarus and says that it's fine. Only Fortinet gives the same result. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Virus detected in official bg.battletech site docs - Google shows as "unsafe" to download - McAfee detects virus
    Let me give you a pro tip from guys doing netsec since the 90s: Get rid of 3rd party AV and use https://virusscan.jotti.org/ for suspicious downloads. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Is there a site that I can upload files for virus scan?
    There is also https://virusscan.jotti.org/ but virustotal is the largest one and communicates with the companies whose scanners they use to report new threats. Source: over 4 years ago
View more

socketify.py mentions (2)

  • Show HN: Python framework is faster than Golang Fiber
    These "benchmarks" are useless, they're not testing anything real world except the performance of uWebsockets. There are copy errors all over the place. And then an advertisement: https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py#briefcase-comme... Is this a professional framework that produces proper, real-world benchmarks and... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • This is how I started the development of the fastest ASGI and WSGI Server in TechEmPower Benchmarks
    After starting the project called socketify.py at https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py, I got pretty good results and reviews, but many people asked if socketify.py could be used to create a WSGI and ASGI server. WSGI and ASGI have a lot of overhead, that's is why I choose not to use them in the first place, but adding an ASGI and WSGI server allows a lot of code already written to run faster! Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Jotti and socketify.py, you can also consider the following products

VirusTotal - VirusTotal is a free service that analyzes suspicious files and URLs and facilitates the quick...

Metadefender - Metadefender, by OPSWAT, allows you to quickly multi-scan your files for malware using 43 antivirus...

Hybrid-Analysis.com - Hybrid-Analysis.com is a free malware analysis service powered by payload-security.com.

URLscan.io - urlscan.io is a free service to scan and analyse websites. When a URL is submitted to urlscan.io, an automated process will browse to the URL like a regular user and record the activity that this page navigation creates.

Any.Run - ANY.RUN is an online interactive sandbox for DFIR/SOC investigations. The service gives access to fast malware analysis and detection of cybersecurity threats.

VirSCAN - VirSCAN.org-free virus scan is a free online scan service, utilizing various anti-virus programs to diagnose single files.